# Auditguard Mcp > A 7-stage compliance pipeline that gates every LLM tool call through RBAC, PII detection, policy enforcement, and audit logging — before and after execution. - **Type:** MCP server - **Install:** `agentstack add mcp-ree2raz-auditguard-mcp` - **Verified:** Yes — security-reviewed for prompt injection and unsafe behavior - **Seller:** [ree2raz](https://agentstack.voostack.com/s/ree2raz) - **Installs:** 0 - **Category:** [AI & ML](https://agentstack.voostack.com/c/ai-and-ml) - **Latest version:** 0.1.0 - **License:** Apache-2.0 - **Upstream author:** [ree2raz](https://github.com/ree2raz) - **Source:** https://github.com/ree2raz/auditguard-mcp - **Website:** https://auditguard.rituraj.info ## Install ```sh agentstack add mcp-ree2raz-auditguard-mcp ``` Requires the [AgentStack CLI](https://agentstack.voostack.com/docs/cli). Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and any MCP-compatible agent. ## About --- title: AuditGuard MCP emoji: 🔒 colorFrom: blue colorTo: gray sdk: docker pinned: false license: apache-2.0 --- # auditguard-mcp A compliance-aware AI tool gateway. When an LLM calls a tool, that call passes through a 7-stage audit pipeline before execution and again before returning. Every stage is pluggable. Every decision is logged. No raw PII leaves the system. Built on OpenAI's Privacy Filter (1.5B params, April 2026), running locally on CPU. This is not a library you install. It is a complete system that demonstrates how to build production-grade AI safety infrastructure for regulated workflows. [](https://auditguard.rituraj.info) **Async backend**: analyst query with PII hashing, RBAC denial for intern, audit log. https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/527df1f6-f4bc-447e-9f44-4c7cc53c01e3 **Temporal backend**: same pipeline with durable workflow, Temporal UI link. https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2d88b1e9-5256-4d0f-bd02-1987efe8fc97 ## The problem Most MCP servers treat tool calls as transparent passthroughs. The LLM asks for SQL. The server runs SQL. The LLM gets results. This is fast. It is also unauditable. If a query returned customer SSNs to an intern, there is no record of who saw what, under which policy, with which PII redactions applied. The tool executed. Nothing else happened. The fix is not a bolt-on. The fix is a pipeline that gates every tool call through four primitives before execution and two more after. RBAC, PII detection, policy enforcement, structured audit logging. If a request cannot pass all four, the tool never runs. ## Architecture: ports and adapters The pipeline uses a ports-and-adapters (hexagonal) pattern. Stage logic lives in `pipeline/stages.py` as pure functions. No IO, no framework dependencies, easy to test. Each orchestration backend (`async_runner.py`, `langgraph_runner.py`, `temporal_runner.py`) is a thin adapter that calls those functions in sequence. Adding another backend (AWS Step Functions, Celery) is roughly 100 lines of adapter code, not a rewrite. The design is **fail-closed**. Unparseable SQL always triggers `RBACDenied`. Missing policy categories default to `ALLOW` explicitly. Audit records never contain raw PII. See [`docs/architecture.md`](docs/architecture.md) for the full design rationale. ## PII detection: a local 1.5B model, not regex Most production PII detection is regex-based. Regex catches SSN patterns and email addresses. It misses contextual PII. A sentence like "the Henderson trust's primary contact" contains no syntactic PII pattern, but a token classifier identifies "Henderson" as a `private_person` span. Regex does not. The project integrates [OpenAI's Privacy Filter](https://huggingface.co/openai/privacy-filter), a 1.5B-parameter sparse mixture-of-experts with 128 experts and top-4 routing (50M active parameters per inference). Runs locally on CPU. No data sent to any API. Supports 8 PII categories using constrained Viterbi decoding over a BIOES tagging scheme. Robust BIOES span decoding (`privacy.py`) maps token predictions back to exact character offsets. This is the unglamorous part most integrations skip and the part that determines whether detections are correct or off-by-several-characters. **Honest limitation.** The model occasionally over-redacts public entities and flags numeric financial values (e.g., `496959.67`) as phone numbers. A post-detection numeric guard in `policy.py` suppresses these false positives rather than trying to force the model to behave differently. Detection is a primitive, not a pipeline. The model detects. The policy layer decides. ## Security: RBAC, policy engine, audit trails **RBAC** uses `sqlglot` to parse SQL into an AST, extracting tables and columns for access validation. Handles subqueries, JOINs, `SELECT *`, and table-prefixed columns. Column filtering uses union logic across JOINs, not intersection. The check is O(1) set membership for tool names, AST-walked for column access. **The policy engine** supports six actions: `ALLOW`, `REDACT`, `HASH`, `VAULT`, `REVIEW`, `BLOCK`. Per-category, per-direction, per-role mappings. `HASH` replaces PII with `[category:sha256-first-8]`, preserving identity consistency so analysts can `GROUP BY` pseudonymized data without seeing real names. Two bundled policies demonstrate opposite compliance philosophies: 1. **permissive_analyst**: hashes names and emails so analysts can correlate records across tables 2. **strict_financial**: replaces all PII with generic `[category]` tags, preventing even statistical correlation Same detection pipeline. Same engine. Same audit logger. Only the config differs. **Audit records** never store raw PII. Original queries and outputs are SHA-256 hashed. Detection text is replaced with `[category]` placeholders. One JSONL record per request, containing the full decision trace. A regulator can verify that the pipeline ran, inspect every decision, and confirm the policy version in effect at the time. They cannot reconstruct the customer's SSN from the audit log. That is the point. ## Infrastructure: Temporal, LangGraph, async Three orchestration backends for the same 7-stage pipeline: | | Async (default) | LangGraph | Temporal | |---|---|---|---| | Latency overhead | None | ~1-5ms | ~50-100ms per stage | | Durability | Lost on crash | Lost on crash | Resumes from last completed stage | | Human-in-the-loop | No | No (short-circuits) | 24-hour signal timeout | | Retry per stage | No | No | Independent policies (RBAC: 3 attempts, Audit: 20) | | Operational cost | Zero | Zero | Temporal cluster + worker process | | Routing model | Imperative if-else | Explicit graph edges | Deterministic workflow | The LangGraph backend (`langgraph_runner.py`) models the pipeline as a `StateGraph` — each stage is a node, branching logic lives in conditional edges, and partial state is preserved via streaming snapshots so error-path audit records are as complete as success-path ones. See [`LANGGRAPH.md`](LANGGRAPH.md) for the full graph topology, state schema, and design rationale. The Temporal workflow (`temporal_runner.py`) handles `ActivityError` unwrapping for RBAC denial, heartbeating for long model inference, and human review signals. Temporal tests use an in-memory server. No Docker needed for CI. ## The 7-stage pipeline Every tool call flows through seven stages. Cheapest checks first, most expensive last. ``` User Query | v [1] RBAC Gate fail-closed set membership check (O(1)) | v [2] Inbound PII Scan 1.5B Privacy Filter detects 8 categories | v [3] Inbound Policy ALLOW | REDACT | HASH | VAULT | REVIEW | BLOCK | v [4] Tool Execution bounded, with timeouts | v [5] Outbound PII Scan canonical JSON scan (sort_keys=True) | v [6] Outbound Policy redact/hash/vault results before returning | v [7] Audit Logging append-only JSONL (SHA-256, no raw PII) | v LLM Response ``` RBAC denies without touching the PII model. The PII model runs before the tool, so a blocked secret never reaches execution. The audit logger fires last, in a `finally`-equivalent path, so it captures timeouts, errors, and blocked requests in addition to successful ones. A failed request that RBAC-denied an intern produces the same audit record shape as a successful request that ran SQL and redacted three account numbers. ## Quality: tests, eval, benchmarks - **116 tests** across unit, integration, and pipeline stages (`tests/`) - **Golden-set eval harness** with 15 test cases measuring RBAC accuracy, PII detection accuracy, and audit completeness (`eval/`) - **Latency benchmarks** reporting p50/p90/p95/p99 for the 1.5B model on CPU (`benchmarks/`) ## Full-stack demo - **Interactive web demo** (`web/index.html`): single-page app with real-time pipeline visualization, MCP Streamable HTTP client, and animated 7-step status indicators. Shows backend type (async/langgraph/temporal) with a colour-coded chip; links to Temporal UI for workflow inspection. - **Synthetic financial dataset** (`scripts/seed_data.py`): realistic data with deliberate PII edge cases (aliases, compound identifiers, one-hop references). ## What this is not This is a reference implementation, not a production-hardened service. Three gaps are documented explicitly: 1. The `REVIEW` action is synchronous. In production, hold the request, return a pending status, and wait for an out-of-band human approval webhook. 2. The vault is a local JSONL file. In production, replace it with [AWS KMS](https://aws.amazon.com/kms/) or [HashiCorp Vault](https://www.vaultproject.io/). 3. The stdio transport assumes a trusted local client. For SSE transport, add mTLS client certificate validation. The repo does not include async review queues, streaming architecture, or multi-node scaling. It is the minimum viable pipeline that proves the four primitives compose correctly. ## Running it ```bash # Prerequisites: Python 3.11+, uv git clone https://github.com/ree2raz/auditguard-mcp.git cd auditguard-mcp make install make seed MOCK_PII=1 make demo # -> http://localhost:7860 (LangGraph backend by default) ``` For LangGraph backend (no extra infra): ```bash AUDITGUARD_BACKEND=langgraph MOCK_PII=1 uv run python web_app.py # -> http://localhost:7860 (chip shows "LangGraph" in blue) ``` For Temporal backend: ```bash docker compose -f docker/docker-compose.temporal.yml up -d # Temporal cluster AUDITGUARD_BACKEND=temporal python -m auditguard_mcp.pipeline.temporal_worker # Worker AUDITGUARD_BACKEND=temporal uv run uvicorn web_app:app --port 7860 # Server # -> http://localhost:8080 for Temporal UI ``` ## Tech stack | Component | Technology | |-----------|-----------| | Language | Python 3.14 | | MCP Server | FastMCP (stdio + Streamable HTTP) | | PII Detection | OpenAI Privacy Filter 1.5B (local CPU) | | SQL Parsing | sqlglot | | Orchestration | asyncio / LangGraph / Temporal | | Web Framework | FastAPI + Uvicorn | | Database | SQLite (synthetic) | | Container | Docker (multi-layer, CPU-only ML deps) | ## License [Apache License 2.0](LICENSE) ## Source & license This open-source MCP server is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code. - **Author:** [ree2raz](https://github.com/ree2raz) - **Source:** [ree2raz/auditguard-mcp](https://github.com/ree2raz/auditguard-mcp) - **License:** Apache-2.0 - **Homepage:** https://auditguard.rituraj.info Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above. ## Pricing - **Free** — Free ## Security capabilities Automated source analysis of v0.1.0 — what this tool can access: - **Network access:** no - **Filesystem access:** no - **Shell / process execution:** no - **Environment & secrets:** no - **Dynamic code execution:** no *"Yes" means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it is unsafe.* ## Versions - **0.1.0** — security scan: passed — Imported from the upstream source. ## Links - Listing page: https://agentstack.voostack.com/l/mcp-ree2raz-auditguard-mcp - Seller: https://agentstack.voostack.com/s/ree2raz - Browse the marketplace: https://agentstack.voostack.com/browse --- Listed on AgentStack — the marketplace for AI agent skills and MCP servers. Every listing is security-reviewed. Creators keep 70%.