# Coder Eval > Test that your Claude Code skills, MCP servers, and CLIs actually work when an agent uses them — sandboxed YAML suites, activation checks, A/B experiments, CI gates. - **Type:** MCP server - **Install:** `agentstack add mcp-uipath-coder-eval` - **Verified:** Yes — security-reviewed for prompt injection and unsafe behavior - **Seller:** [UiPath](https://agentstack.voostack.com/s/uipath) - **Installs:** 0 - **Category:** [Developer Tools](https://agentstack.voostack.com/c/developer-tools) - **Latest version:** 0.1.0 - **License:** Apache-2.0 - **Upstream author:** [UiPath](https://github.com/UiPath) - **Source:** https://github.com/UiPath/coder_eval - **Website:** https://coder-eval.com ## Install ```sh agentstack add mcp-uipath-coder-eval ``` Requires the [AgentStack CLI](https://agentstack.voostack.com/docs/cli). Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and any MCP-compatible agent. ## About # Coder Eval — evaluate & benchmark AI coding agents and Claude Code skills [](https://pypi.org/project/coder-eval/) [](https://coder-eval.com) [](https://coder-eval.com/docs) [](LICENSE) [](https://www.python.org/downloads/) [](https://github.com/UiPath/coder_eval/actions/workflows/pr-checks.yml) **Coder Eval** (`pip install coder-eval` / `uv tool install coder-eval`) is an open-source framework for **evaluating and benchmarking AI coding agents and their skills** — built for CLI and skill builders — with sandboxing, reproducibility, and data-driven analysis. It runs a real agent (**Claude Code**, **Codex**, or **Google Antigravity / Gemini**) in a sandbox against declarative YAML tasks, then scores the files and commands it actually produced. Not an "agentic coding" benchmark: it measures how effective your CLI and skills are when used by coding agents. Reach for it when you want to **test whether a Claude Code skill triggers**, **A/B-test Claude Code vs. Codex vs. Gemini** (or model vs. model, prompt vs. prompt), or **gate CI on coding-agent quality**. Unlike fixed datasets (SWE-bench, SkillsBench) that rank models on a shared leaderboard, Coder Eval evaluates the tasks, skills, and workflows *you* ship — with weighted 0.0–1.0 criteria, a `skill_triggered` activation check, an A/B experiment layer, and per-tool cost telemetry. See [How it compares](https://coder-eval.com/docs/comparison). 📚 **Full docs:** **[coder-eval.com/docs](https://coder-eval.com/docs)**. - **Declarative YAML tasks** with pinned dependencies and clear success criteria - **Sandboxed execution** in isolated environments with resource limits - **Weighted, continuous scoring** (0.0–1.0) with fractional credit and thresholds - **Many criterion types** — from file checks to code similarity and LLM-graded rubrics - **Agent abstraction** — Claude Code, Codex, and Antigravity (Gemini) today, extensible via a plugin SPI - **Experiment layer** — A/B agent configs (models, tools, prompts) side-by-side - **Full telemetry** — every tool call, token counts, and cost, with real-time streaming ## What you can do with it - **Benchmark coding agents** — score an agent across a suite of tasks with weighted scoring and pass/fail thresholds - **Compare models & configs** — A/B-test Claude vs. Codex vs. Gemini, model vs. model, tool-on vs. tool-off, prompt vs. prompt - **Evaluate skills** — verify an agent actually engages a target skill (`skill_triggered`) and score skill-driven suites (SkillsBench-style) - **Keep skills up to date in CI** — re-validate your skills on every change or on a schedule; catch silent regressions when models, prompts, or the skills themselves drift - **Gate CI on agent quality** — run the suite in GitHub Actions and fail the build on regressions - **Bring your own dataset** — fan one task out over many rows for larger benchmark suites > **Keeping skills fresh?** Run Coder Eval as a scheduled GitHub Actions job so your > skills are continuously re-evaluated against the latest model — a skill that quietly > stops triggering surfaces as a failing criterion before your users hit it. See > **[Tutorial 02 — Running Coder Eval in CI](docs/tutorials/02-ci-pipeline.md)**. ## Quick Start **Prerequisites:** Python 3.13+, [uv](https://docs.astral.sh/uv/) 0.8+, and the [Claude CLI](https://docs.anthropic.com/claude/docs/claude-code) (`brew install claude`). Developed on macOS; CI runs on Linux. ```bash git clone https://github.com/UiPath/coder_eval.git cd coder_eval uv sync --extra dev # install core + dev tools cp .env.example .env # then set ANTHROPIC_API_KEY — or skip that: an # existing Claude Code login (`claude login`) is # picked up automatically uv run coder-eval plan tasks/hello_date.yaml # validate (no tokens spent) uv run coder-eval run tasks/hello_date.yaml # run your first evaluation uv run coder-eval report runs/latest # view the result ``` New here? Follow **[Tutorial 01 — Your First Evaluation](docs/tutorials/01-first-evaluation.md)**. The optional `[uipath]` extra (`uv sync --extra dev --extra uipath`) adds the in-host `uipath` SDK for local sandbox parity; it installs from public PyPI (no credentials required). Without it the framework runs end-to-end; uipath-dependent features fail at dispatch with a clear hint. **Using Coder Eval in CI or another project?** Install the published package instead of cloning: ```bash uv tool install coder-eval # puts the `coder-eval` CLI on your PATH, # in its own isolated environment uv tool install "coder-eval[codex,antigravity]" # same, with agent extras coder-eval --version # verify the install ``` To add it as a project dependency instead: `uv add coder-eval` or `pip install coder-eval`. In a real CI gate, pin to a specific released version so a harness upgrade can't silently move your results. (The example `tasks/` live in this repo — clone it or point the CLI at your own task files.) See [Tutorial 02 — Running Coder Eval in CI](docs/tutorials/02-ci-pipeline.md) for the full setup. ## Use as a GitHub Action A composite action at the repo root runs `coder-eval` as a CI gate — it installs the pinned CLI, runs your tasks, writes a JUnit XML report, appends `run.md` to the job summary, and fails the step on any task/gate failure: ```yaml - uses: UiPath/coder_eval@v0 # becomes @v1 once 1.0.0 ships; @vX.Y.Z pins exactly with: tasks: tests/tasks/**/*.yaml model: claude-sonnet-5 env: | ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }} ``` | Input | Default | Purpose | | --- | --- | --- | | `tasks` | *(all `tasks/`)* | Task YAML path(s)/glob | | `tags` | — | `--tags` filter | | `model` | — | `--model` override | | `extra-args` | — | Verbatim extra args (`--experiment`, `-D …`, …) | | `version` | pinned release | PyPI version, or `local` to install from the checkout | | `run-dir` | `runs/ci` | Run directory | | `junit-path` | `coder-eval-junit.xml` | Where to write the JUnit report | | `step-summary` | `true` | Append `run.md` to the job summary | | `env` | — | Credentials/backend passthrough: newline-separated `NAME=VALUE` pairs, exported for the run step only | | `minimum-task-score` | *(off)* | Strict floor (0.0–1.0): fail the step if any task's `weighted_score` is below it | Outputs: `run-dir` and `junit-path`. Feed the JUnit file to your platform's test-report renderer — e.g. on GitHub Actions with [`mikepenz/action-junit-report`](https://github.com/mikepenz/action-junit-report): ```yaml - uses: mikepenz/action-junit-report@v5 if: always() with: report_paths: coder-eval-junit.xml ``` **Credentials and backend config** are the sole responsibility of `env` — a passthrough exported for the run step only (never written to `$GITHUB_ENV`, so it can't leak into later steps). Set whatever the run needs, Anthropic or not: ```yaml - uses: UiPath/coder_eval@v0 with: tasks: tests/tasks/**/*.yaml minimum-task-score: "0.8" # fail the build if any task scores below 0.8 env: | API_BACKEND=bedrock AWS_BEARER_TOKEN_BEDROCK=${{ secrets.BEDROCK_TOKEN }} ``` `minimum-task-score` is a strict floor **on top of** coder-eval's own exit code: the step fails if *either* coder-eval exits non-zero *or* any task's `weighted_score` falls below the floor. Leave it unset to gate on the exit code alone. > **Agent runtime is the caller's responsibility.** The action is agent-agnostic — > it installs `coder-eval` but no coding-agent runtime. Tasks using the default > `claude-code` agent need the `claude` CLI on `PATH` (`actions/setup-node` + > `npm install -g @anthropic-ai/claude-code`) in the job before the action runs. > **Security.** Evaluated tasks execute agent-generated code. Do **not** run this > action under `pull_request_target` with secrets exposed to untrusted fork PRs — > use `pull_request` and gate on the same-repo condition, as this repo's own > dogfood job does. ## Telemetry > 📊 **Usage telemetry is on by default.** `coder-eval` sends **anonymous** usage > telemetry (command names, outcomes, counts, durations, an anonymous install id, > platform info) to help improve the tool. It **never** captures prompts, file > contents, or repo paths, and prints a one-time notice on first run. **To disable > it, set `TELEMETRY_ENABLED=false`** in your `.env` or environment. See > [Usage Telemetry](docs/USER_GUIDE.md#usage-telemetry) for details and how to route > it to your own resource. ## Documentation | Guide | What's in it | | --- | --- | | [Tutorials](docs/tutorials/README.md) | Step-by-step walkthroughs — start here | | [User Guide](docs/USER_GUIDE.md) | Full CLI, configuration, output, and environment-variable reference | | [Task Definition Guide](docs/TASK_DEFINITION_GUIDE.md) | The task-file schema — all criterion types, scoring, templates | | [Claude Code](docs/agents/CLAUDE_CODE.md) | Configuring and running the default Claude Code agent | | [Codex](docs/agents/CODEX.md) | Running the OpenAI Codex agent | | [Antigravity (Gemini)](docs/agents/ANTIGRAVITY.md) | Running the Google Antigravity / Gemini agent | | [A/B Experiments](docs/AB_EXPERIMENTS.md) | Compare models / tools / prompts across the same tasks | | [Bring Your Own Dataset](docs/DATASETS.md) | Fan a single task out over a dataset | | [Dialog Mode](docs/DIALOG_MODE.md) | Evaluate agents in multi-turn conversation via a simulated user | | [Docker Isolation](docs/DOCKER_ISOLATION.md) | The container sandbox driver, with custom images | | [CI Gate & GitHub Action](docs/CI_GATE.md) | Run Coder Eval as a CI gate — the packaged Action, JUnit output, score floor | | [Extending Coder Eval](docs/EXTENDING.md) | Author a custom agent, criterion, or model pricing via the plugin SPI | | [Report Schema](docs/REPORT_SCHEMA.md) | Field-level reference for run.json / variant.json / task.json | | [How It Compares](docs/comparison.md) | vs. SWE-bench, SkillsBench, Harbor, OpenAI Evals, hand-rolled scripts | | Repo doc | What's in it | | --- | --- | | [CLAUDE.md](CLAUDE.md) | Architecture, key patterns, and extension points | | [CONTRIBUTING.md](CONTRIBUTING.md) | Dev setup, quality bar, and how to contribute | ## How it compares - **vs. fixed benchmarks (SWE-bench, SkillsBench)** — they score a canonical dataset; Coder Eval scores *your* tasks with continuous 0.0–1.0 weighted criteria (and can still wrap a fixed dataset via [Bring Your Own Dataset](docs/DATASETS.md)). - **vs. large-scale / RL harnesses (Harbor)** — Harbor targets scale and RL rollouts; Coder Eval targets weighted, skill-aware suites gated in CI. - **vs. model-output eval tools (OpenAI Evals)** — they grade model text; Coder Eval runs a full agent in a sandbox and scores the files and commands it produced. - **vs. hand-rolled scripts** — reproducible sandboxes, weighted criteria, cost/token telemetry, A/B experiments, and CI-ready pass/fail gates out of the box. See the full [comparison — with sources](https://coder-eval.com/docs/comparison). ## Task Definition A task is a YAML file: a prompt, the agent config, a sandbox, and success criteria. ```yaml task_id: "hello_world" description: "Create a Python script that prints Hello, World!" initial_prompt: "Create hello.py that prints 'Hello, World!'" agent: type: "claude-code" permission_mode: "acceptEdits" allowed_tools: ["Read", "Write", "Bash"] sandbox: driver: "tempdir" python: {} success_criteria: - type: "file_exists" path: "hello.py" description: "hello.py must be created" - type: "run_command" command: "python hello.py" timeout: 10 description: "Script must execute successfully" ``` Tasks can omit the `agent` section entirely — defaults resolve from the experiment layer (`experiments/default.yaml`). For the full schema and every criterion type, see the [Task Definition Guide](docs/TASK_DEFINITION_GUIDE.md). > **Tip:** In Claude Code, use `/coder-eval-task-create` to scaffold a task from a > natural-language description, and `/coder-eval-run-analysis runs/latest` to get > improvement suggestions from a completed run. ## Development ```bash make install # package + dev + [uipath] deps + pre-commit hooks make verify # format + lint + typecheck + test + coverage (CI equivalent) ``` Run `make verify` before pushing — it mirrors CI (80% coverage threshold). See [CONTRIBUTING.md](CONTRIBUTING.md) for the full workflow, commit conventions, and extension points (new criteria, new agents). ## Known limits & non-goals - **Not a fixed benchmark or leaderboard** — Coder Eval scores *your* tasks and ships example tasks, not a canonical scored dataset. - **Tasks execute real code** — run untrusted tasks only under the container driver (see [Docker Isolation](docs/DOCKER_ISOLATION.md)); the `tempdir` driver is not a security boundary. - **Bring your own model credentials** — Anthropic, Bedrock, or Gemini keys; Coder Eval does not proxy or supply model access. - **Python 3.13+ only.** ## Support & security - **Security vulnerabilities** — report privately via [SECURITY.md](SECURITY.md); never open a public issue. - **Bugs & questions** — open a [GitHub issue](https://github.com/UiPath/coder_eval/issues). - **Everything else** — reach the maintainers privately at **coder-eval@uipath.com**. ## License © 2026 UiPath. Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 — see [LICENSE](LICENSE) and [NOTICE](NOTICE). ## Acknowledgments Built with the [Claude Agent SDK](https://github.com/anthropics/claude-agent-sdk), [Pydantic](https://pydantic.dev/), [Typer](https://typer.tiangolo.com/), and [Rich](https://rich.readthedocs.io/). ## Source & license This open-source MCP server is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code. - **Author:** [UiPath](https://github.com/UiPath) - **Source:** [UiPath/coder_eval](https://github.com/UiPath/coder_eval) - **License:** Apache-2.0 - **Homepage:** https://coder-eval.com Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above. ## Pricing - **Free** — Free ## Security capabilities Automated source analysis of v0.1.0 — what this tool can access: - **Network access:** no - **Filesystem access:** no - **Shell / process execution:** no - **Environment & secrets:** yes - **Dynamic code execution:** no *"Yes" means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it is unsafe.* ## Versions - **0.1.0** — security scan: passed — Imported from the upstream source. ## Links - Listing page: https://agentstack.voostack.com/l/mcp-uipath-coder-eval - Seller: https://agentstack.voostack.com/s/uipath - Browse the marketplace: https://agentstack.voostack.com/browse --- Listed on AgentStack — the marketplace for AI agent skills and MCP servers. Every listing is security-reviewed. Creators keep 70%.