# Writing Executive Summaries

> Writes the executive summary for a US Federal proposal. Use when the user needs an executive summary, an executive summary volume, a proposal summary, or the opening volume of a federal bid. Writes the executive summary as a persuasion document organized around customer hot buttons and win themes (not a table-of-contents recap) built to make the evaluator favor award before reaching the detailed…

- **Type:** Skill
- **Install:** `agentstack add skill-danielkinneyspears-federal-proposal-skills-writing-executive-summaries`
- **Verified:** Yes — security-reviewed for prompt injection and unsafe behavior
- **Seller:** [danielkinneyspears](https://agentstack.voostack.com/s/danielkinneyspears)
- **Installs:** 0
- **Category:** [Agent Skills](https://agentstack.voostack.com/c/agent-skills)
- **Latest version:** 0.1.0
- **License:** Apache-2.0
- **Upstream author:** [danielkinneyspears](https://github.com/danielkinneyspears)
- **Source:** https://github.com/danielkinneyspears/federal-proposal-skills/tree/main/skills/writing-executive-summaries

## Install

```sh
agentstack add skill-danielkinneyspears-federal-proposal-skills-writing-executive-summaries
```

Requires the [AgentStack CLI](https://agentstack.voostack.com/docs/cli). Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and any MCP-compatible agent.

## About

# Writing Executive Summaries

Write the executive summary as what it actually is: the most-read, most
influential pages of the proposal, and a persuasion document — not a summary.
Many evaluators read the executive summary first, and it frames how they read
everything after. An executive summary that recaps the table of contents wastes
that position. One built around the customer's concerns and the win themes uses
it.

## When to use this skill

Use this skill once the win strategy exists and the volume content is at least
storyboarded — the executive summary distills the win themes and previews the
proposal's case, so it is written with knowledge of both. It is often drafted
early for direction and finalized late once the volumes are stable.

This skill writes the executive summary specifically. General section narrative
is `drafting-proposal-sections`.

## Inputs

**Preferred upstream artifacts:**
- `05-win-strategy.md`: the win themes, discriminators, and hot buttons. The
  executive summary is largely the win strategy in prose.
- `10-compliance-matrix.md`: Section L rules governing the executive summary
  (page limit, whether it is evaluated, content restrictions).
- `11-proposal-outline.md` and `12-sections/` — the proposal's actual case, so
  the summary previews it accurately.
- `00-opportunity-profile.md`: the customer and requirement.

**Without the win strategy**, the executive summary cannot be done well — it has
no themes to carry. Recommend running `developing-win-strategy` first.

Read `../../shared/glossary.md` and `../../shared/pursuit-workspace.md` if not
already read this session.

## Intake

Ask these as a numbered list. Skip what upstream artifacts answer.

1. **Section L rules for the executive summary.** Is there a page limit? Is the
   executive summary evaluated, or informational only? Does Section L restrict
   its content (for example, prohibiting information that appears *only* in the
   executive summary)?
2. **Customer hot buttons.** What does this customer care about most? (From
   `05-win-strategy.md` if available.)
3. **Win themes.** What are the three to five win themes the proposal carries?
4. **The decision frame.** In one sentence, why should this customer choose this
   offeror over the field?
5. **Format.** Is the executive summary a cover letter, a standalone volume, or
   a section — and are graphics allowed?

## Workflow

```
Executive Summary:
- [ ] Step 1: Read the win strategy and Section L rules; complete intake
- [ ] Step 2: Confirm the central message
- [ ] Step 3: Structure around hot buttons and themes
- [ ] Step 4: Draft — customer-focused opening, themes, close
- [ ] Step 5: Run the executive summary self-check
- [ ] Step 6: Write the artifact (13-executive-summary.md)
```

**Step 1: Read and intake.** Read the win strategy and the Section L rules.

**Step 2: Central message.** State, in one sentence, the reason this offer
wins. Everything in the executive summary serves that message. If the message is
not clear, the executive summary cannot be — return to the win strategy.

**Step 3: Structure.** Structure the executive summary around the **customer's
hot buttons and the win themes**, not the proposal's volume order. Use
`references/executive-summary-method.md` for the structure: a customer-focused
opening, a small number of theme-driven blocks, and a confident close.

**Step 4: Draft.** Draft following the method file:
- Open on the **customer** — their mission, their problem, what they need to
  achieve — not on the offeror's history.
- Devote a short block to each win theme: the customer benefit, the
  discriminator, the proof, in the customer's terms.
- Address the top hot buttons explicitly, including risk.
- Close with a confident, specific statement of why this offer is the
  low-risk best value — never a generic "we look forward to working with you".
- Respect the page limit and any Section L content restriction.

**Step 5: Self-check.** Run the self-check in the method file: the customer is
the subject of the opening; every theme is benefit-led and proven; it persuades
rather than summarizes; it would still make sense to an evaluator who read
nothing else; and it introduces no requirement-response that exists *only* here
if Section L forbids that.

**Step 6: Write.** Write `13-executive-summary.md` using
`templates/executive-summary.md`.

## Output

One artifact: `13-executive-summary.md` in the pursuit workspace.

Present the user with: the executive summary draft, the central message it
carries, and any Section L constraint that shaped it.

## References

- `references/executive-summary-method.md`: what an executive summary is and is not, its structure, the customer-focused opening, threading themes, Section L pitfalls, and the self-check.
- `templates/executive-summary.md`: the executive summary artifact template.

## Guardrails

- **It is not a summary.** Do not recap the proposal volume by volume. The
  executive summary persuades; it is organized around the customer, not the
  table of contents.
- **Open on the customer.** The first paragraph is about the customer's mission
  and problem — never the offeror's founding date or revenue.
- **Themes, with proof.** Every theme carries a customer benefit and real
  substantiation. No unsupported superlatives.
- **Watch the Section L trap.** Some solicitations bar content that appears only
  in the executive summary. If so, every claim here is also made and supported
  in the volume that owns it.
- **No fabrication.** Every proof point traces to real evidence.

## Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

- **Author:** [danielkinneyspears](https://github.com/danielkinneyspears)
- **Source:** [danielkinneyspears/federal-proposal-skills](https://github.com/danielkinneyspears/federal-proposal-skills)
- **License:** Apache-2.0

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

## Pricing

- **Free** — Free

## Security capabilities

Automated source analysis of v0.1.0 — what this tool can access:

- **Network access:** no
- **Filesystem access:** no
- **Shell / process execution:** no
- **Environment & secrets:** no
- **Dynamic code execution:** no

*"Yes" means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it is unsafe.*


## Versions

- **0.1.0** — security scan: passed — Imported from the upstream source.

## Links

- Listing page: https://agentstack.voostack.com/l/skill-danielkinneyspears-federal-proposal-skills-writing-executive-summaries
- Seller: https://agentstack.voostack.com/s/danielkinneyspears
- Browse the marketplace: https://agentstack.voostack.com/browse

---
Listed on AgentStack — the marketplace for AI agent skills and MCP servers. Every listing is security-reviewed. Creators keep 70%.
