# Platform Rubric Manager

> Use when a content system needs platform-specific scoring rules, or when retro results should update the rubric for WeChat, Xiaohongshu, X, TikTok, Facebook, Reddit, or dev.to.

- **Type:** Skill
- **Install:** `agentstack add skill-giantclam-auto-viral-article-writer-platform-rubric-manager`
- **Verified:** Yes — security-reviewed for prompt injection and unsafe behavior
- **Seller:** [GiantClam](https://agentstack.voostack.com/s/giantclam)
- **Installs:** 0
- **Category:** [Agent Skills](https://agentstack.voostack.com/c/agent-skills)
- **Latest version:** 0.1.0
- **License:** MIT
- **Upstream author:** [GiantClam](https://github.com/GiantClam)
- **Source:** https://github.com/GiantClam/auto-viral-article-writer/tree/master/skills/platform-rubric-manager

## Install

```sh
agentstack add skill-giantclam-auto-viral-article-writer-platform-rubric-manager
```

Requires the [AgentStack CLI](https://agentstack.voostack.com/docs/cli). Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and any MCP-compatible agent.

## About

# Platform Rubric Manager

Use this skill when platform-level judgment standards need to be created, reviewed, compared, or updated.

## Use This For

- creating one rubric per platform
- reviewing the current rubric before scoring content
- updating a rubric after repeated retro signals
- comparing old and new rubric versions

## Do Not Use This For

- writing the source article
- rewriting platform drafts
- scoring a specific draft directly
- publishing content

## Inputs

- platform name
- optional existing rubric file
- optional retro findings
- optional benchmark examples

## Outputs

- platform rubric draft or revision
- concise change summary
- explicit notes on what was added, removed, or tightened

## Recommended File Layout

```text
rubrics/
  wechat.yaml
  xiaohongshu.yaml
  x.yaml
  tiktok.yaml
  facebook.yaml
  reddit.yaml
  devto.yaml
```

## Rubric Structure

Each platform rubric should define at minimum:

- platform goal
- audience expectation
- scoring dimensions
- strong signals
- risk signals
- tone rules
- CTA rules when relevant

Example shape:

```yaml
platform: wechat
goal: build authority and complete an argument
dimensions:
  - title_strength
  - opening_grab
  - structure_depth
  - information_density
  - insight_strength
strong_signals:
  - result-first opening
  - clear section rhythm
  - concrete examples supporting a judgment
risk_signals:
  - opening too slow
  - generic conclusion
  - weak title promise
```

## Modes

### 1. View

Use when a platform draft is about to be scored and the current rubric must be checked first.

### 2. Update

Use when retro results show repeated misses or repeated wins that should change future judgment.

### 3. Diff

Use when comparing an old rubric and a proposed new rubric.

### 4. Promote

Use when a revised rubric is judged better and should replace the working version.

## Core Pattern

1. Keep one rubric per platform.
2. Do not merge all platforms into one universal scoring file.
3. Update a rubric only after repeated evidence, not one random outlier.
4. Prefer small explicit changes over full rewrites.

## Common Mistakes

- Using one rubric across all platforms.
- Updating the rubric after a single surprising result.
- Letting tone rules stay vague.
- Keeping old dimensions that no longer explain results.

## Quick Rules

- Platform logic is local, not universal.
- Retro data should refine the rubric, not replace judgment.
- Small repeated misses matter more than one lucky hit.
- Rubrics should become sharper over time, not longer by default.

## Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

- **Author:** [GiantClam](https://github.com/GiantClam)
- **Source:** [GiantClam/auto-viral-article-writer](https://github.com/GiantClam/auto-viral-article-writer)
- **License:** MIT

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

## Pricing

- **Free** — Free

## Security capabilities

Automated source analysis of v0.1.0 — what this tool can access:

- **Network access:** no
- **Filesystem access:** no
- **Shell / process execution:** no
- **Environment & secrets:** no
- **Dynamic code execution:** no

*"Yes" means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it is unsafe.*


## Versions

- **0.1.0** — security scan: passed — Imported from the upstream source.

## Links

- Listing page: https://agentstack.voostack.com/l/skill-giantclam-auto-viral-article-writer-platform-rubric-manager
- Seller: https://agentstack.voostack.com/s/giantclam
- Browse the marketplace: https://agentstack.voostack.com/browse

---
Listed on AgentStack — the marketplace for AI agent skills and MCP servers. Every listing is security-reviewed. Creators keep 70%.