# Code Review Lite

> Abbreviated code review for small or low-stakes code changes. Skips requirements gathering. Skips the linter in PR mode (CI runs it). Focuses on correctness against obvious intent, readability, and pattern consistency. For large or security-sensitive diffs, use code-review-deep instead.

- **Type:** Skill
- **Install:** `agentstack add skill-gsarig-skills-code-review-lite`
- **Verified:** Yes — security-reviewed for prompt injection and unsafe behavior
- **Seller:** [gsarig](https://agentstack.voostack.com/s/gsarig)
- **Installs:** 0
- **Category:** [Developer Tools](https://agentstack.voostack.com/c/developer-tools)
- **Latest version:** 0.1.0
- **License:** MIT
- **Upstream author:** [gsarig](https://github.com/gsarig)
- **Source:** https://github.com/gsarig/skills/tree/main/skills/code-review-lite

## Install

```sh
agentstack add skill-gsarig-skills-code-review-lite
```

Requires the [AgentStack CLI](https://agentstack.voostack.com/docs/cli). Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and any MCP-compatible agent.

## About

## Steps

### 1. Source and diff

Read `~/.claude/skills/code-review/references/review-shared.md` and follow its source detection and diff fetching sections. If `--source` and the corresponding identifier args were passed, use those and skip any prompting.

### 2. Lint (conditional)

Skip the linter when source mode is `pr` and `--lint` was not passed (CI runs the linter on the PR).

Otherwise run the linter per the linter detection section of the shared doc.

### 3. Load language references (conditional)

If any changed path matches `\.(js|jsx|ts|tsx|mjs|cjs)$`, read `~/.claude/skills/code-review/references/js-security.md`.

### 4. GitHub Actions hash verification (conditional)

If the diff contains any line matching `^\+\s*uses:\s+\S+@[0-9a-f]{40}`, run the verification per the shared doc.

### 5. Review

Read `~/.claude/skills/code-review/references/review-checklist.md` first for general principles.

Focus on:

- Correctness against obvious intent. Lite reviews do not gather requirements; reason about what the diff is trying to do from the code itself.
- Readability and naming.
- Matches existing patterns in the file or nearby files.
- Dead code, debug artefacts, accidental scope creep.
- Security issues that are visible without deep analysis (hardcoded secrets, obvious injection, missing input validation on user-facing entry points).

Do not deep-dive architecture or push for refactors beyond the diff. Honour the common review rules in the shared doc.

### 6. Output

Format per the output section of `~/.claude/skills/code-review/references/review-shared.md`.

## Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

- **Author:** [gsarig](https://github.com/gsarig)
- **Source:** [gsarig/skills](https://github.com/gsarig/skills)
- **License:** MIT

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

## Pricing

- **Free** — Free

## Security capabilities

Automated source analysis of v0.1.0 — what this tool can access:

- **Network access:** no
- **Filesystem access:** no
- **Shell / process execution:** no
- **Environment & secrets:** no
- **Dynamic code execution:** no

*"Yes" means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it is unsafe.*


## Versions

- **0.1.0** — security scan: passed — Imported from the upstream source.

## Links

- Listing page: https://agentstack.voostack.com/l/skill-gsarig-skills-code-review-lite
- Seller: https://agentstack.voostack.com/s/gsarig
- Browse the marketplace: https://agentstack.voostack.com/browse

---
Listed on AgentStack — the marketplace for AI agent skills and MCP servers. Every listing is security-reviewed. Creators keep 70%.