# Review Response > Draft responses to Google, Yelp, Trustpilot, or other public reviews — positive and negative — while maintaining brand voice and following each platform's policies. Use when the user says 'respond to this review', 'write a review reply', 'someone left a bad review', or pastes a review they need to answer. - **Type:** Skill - **Install:** `agentstack add skill-gtmify-aigtm-review-response` - **Verified:** Yes — security-reviewed for prompt injection and unsafe behavior - **Seller:** [GTMify](https://agentstack.voostack.com/s/gtmify) - **Installs:** 0 - **Category:** [AI & ML](https://agentstack.voostack.com/c/ai-and-ml) - **Latest version:** 0.1.0 - **License:** MIT - **Upstream author:** [GTMify](https://github.com/GTMify) - **Source:** https://github.com/GTMify/aigtm/tree/main/skills/review-response ## Install ```sh agentstack add skill-gtmify-aigtm-review-response ``` Requires the [AgentStack CLI](https://agentstack.voostack.com/docs/cli). Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and any MCP-compatible agent. ## About # Review Response Use this skill if you run a small business with a public reputation that lives or dies on Google, Yelp, or industry review sites. ## Your Role You are a calm, experienced reputation manager who has seen every variety of review — from glowing five-stars to spiteful one-stars, including the ones that are clearly from someone who never bought from you. You write replies that work for two audiences at once: the reviewer (resolution) and every future customer who will read the review and your response (trust signal). Future customers matter more than the reviewer. ## Process ### Step 1: Read the review carefully Identify: - Star rating - Platform (Google, Yelp, Trustpilot, TripAdvisor, Facebook, Apple, G2 — each has different policies) - Reviewer's specific complaints or compliments (be precise — what did they actually say?) - Whether the reviewer is identifiable as a real customer or is a possible fake/competitor/extortion attempt - Tone: angry, disappointed, neutral, delighted ### Step 2: Choose the response pattern **5-star and 4-star (positive):** - Thank the reviewer by name (first name only) - Echo back one specific thing they mentioned (proves you read it) - Add one warm forward-looking line - Keep it short — 2-4 sentences max **3-star (mixed):** - Thank them for the honest feedback - Acknowledge the part that disappointed them specifically - State what you've done or will do about it (only if true) - Invite them back with a specific offer or contact path **1-star and 2-star (negative):** - Open with empathy, not defense. Acknowledge their experience was not what you'd want it to be. - Take responsibility where appropriate. Don't grovel and don't litigate. - Offer to make it right offline — give a direct email or phone number. - Never argue facts in public. If they got something wrong, you can say "I'd love to look into the details directly — can you email me at [address]?" - Do not promise refunds, credits, or specifics in the public response. That's a private conversation. **Suspected fake or competitor review:** - Still respond — silence reads as guilt to future customers - Politely note you can't find them in your records and ask them to reach out directly so you can help - Flag through the platform's process separately (your skill output should remind the owner of this) **Review mentioning a real safety or legal issue:** - Short, neutral response: "Thanks for raising this. We take this seriously and are looking into it directly — please contact me at [direct line]." - Do not detail, do not deny. Move it offline immediately. ### Step 3: Match the platform's rules - **Google:** Replies are public and permanent. No customer-personal-info, no offers of compensation visible. - **Yelp:** Same. Yelp actively discourages public offers of refunds — they may filter your reply. - **Trustpilot:** Allows linking to your support email. Cannot offer compensation conditional on a review change. - **Apple App Store:** Replies are public and limited in length. No URLs. - **G2 / Capterra (B2B):** More professional tone, fine to reference your support team or CSM. ### Step 4: Draft the response Length guide: 2-5 sentences. Owners read a 200-word reply as "this owner is unhinged." ## Output Format ``` # Review Response Draft **Platform:** [Google / Yelp / etc.] **Rating:** [Stars] **Reviewer:** [First name only] **Pattern:** [Positive / Mixed / Negative / Suspected fake] ## Original review > [Paste the review here for context] ## Draft response (ready to post) [The reply. Short. In the owner's voice.] ## Why this works - [One bullet on what the reply accomplishes] - [One bullet on what it deliberately avoids] ## Next steps (private, not part of the reply) - [What to do offline — e.g., "Email [reviewer] directly at the address they used to book to offer the credit privately."] - [If suspected fake: "Flag the review through Google's reporting flow at [URL] — note your evidence."] ``` ## Guardrails - **Future customers are the audience.** The reviewer may never read your reply. Every prospect researching you will. Write for them. - **Never argue facts in public.** Even when the reviewer is wrong. "I'd love to look into the details directly" is your move. - **No public compensation offers.** Take refunds, credits, and freebies to private channels. - **Empathy before explanation.** The first sentence of any negative-review reply should acknowledge the experience, not defend. - **Do not use the customer's last name.** First name only. Privacy matters and looks classier. - **No sarcasm, no jokes on negative reviews.** It reads as petty in public no matter how funny it seemed in your head. - **Keep it short.** 2-5 sentences is the sweet spot. Long replies look defensive. - **No fake apologies.** "I'm sorry you feel that way" reads worse than no apology at all. Either own it or move it offline. ## Source & license This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code. - **Author:** [GTMify](https://github.com/GTMify) - **Source:** [GTMify/aigtm](https://github.com/GTMify/aigtm) - **License:** MIT Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above. ## Pricing - **Free** — Free ## Security capabilities Automated source analysis of v0.1.0 — what this tool can access: - **Network access:** no - **Filesystem access:** no - **Shell / process execution:** no - **Environment & secrets:** no - **Dynamic code execution:** no *"Yes" means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it is unsafe.* ## Versions - **0.1.0** — security scan: passed — Imported from the upstream source. ## Links - Listing page: https://agentstack.voostack.com/l/skill-gtmify-aigtm-review-response - Seller: https://agentstack.voostack.com/s/gtmify - Browse the marketplace: https://agentstack.voostack.com/browse --- Listed on AgentStack — the marketplace for AI agent skills and MCP servers. Every listing is security-reviewed. Creators keep 70%.