# Full Eval > Complete strategic and personal evaluation of any idea, project, or life decision. Runs architect (6 business evaluators) and council (8 life advisors) in parallel, cross-references their outputs, and generates a PDF report. Use when: full evaluation, complete assessment, should I do this, evaluate everything, life decision, career move, startup decision. - **Type:** Skill - **Install:** `agentstack add skill-juanmarchetto-agent-skills-full-eval` - **Verified:** Yes — security-reviewed for prompt injection and unsafe behavior - **Seller:** [JuanMarchetto](https://agentstack.voostack.com/s/juanmarchetto) - **Installs:** 0 - **Category:** [Web & Browser](https://agentstack.voostack.com/c/web-and-browser) - **Latest version:** 0.1.0 - **License:** MIT - **Upstream author:** [JuanMarchetto](https://github.com/JuanMarchetto) - **Source:** https://github.com/JuanMarchetto/agent-skills/tree/main/skills/full-eval - **Website:** https://github.com/JuanMarchetto/agent-skills ## Install ```sh agentstack add skill-juanmarchetto-agent-skills-full-eval ``` Requires the [AgentStack CLI](https://agentstack.voostack.com/docs/cli). Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and any MCP-compatible agent. ## About # Full Evaluation: Strategic + Personal Assessment Evaluate any idea, project, or life decision from **every angle** -- 6 business evaluators and 8 life advisors running in parallel, cross-referenced into a unified verdict, delivered as a professional PDF report. One command. Complete assessment. ## When to Use This | Situation | Example | |-----------|---------| | Career move | "Should I quit my job to build this startup?" | | New project | "Is this SaaS idea worth pursuing?" | | Life decision | "Should I relocate to another country for this opportunity?" | | Investment | "Should I invest 6 months into learning this technology?" | | Pivot decision | "My project is stalling -- should I pivot or persevere?" | Use this when the decision spans both **strategic viability** (will it work?) and **personal fit** (should *I* do it, *now*?). For purely business analysis, use architect alone. For purely personal planning, use council alone. ## Dependencies This skill composes three existing systems: | System | Role | Agents | |--------|------|--------| | **Architect** | Strategic evaluation | 6 evaluators (Risk, Technical, Market, Impact, Resources, Innovation) + synthesizer | | **Council** | Personal evaluation | 8 advisors (Life Coach, Finance, Health, Career, Learning, Systems, Relationships, Creative) + synthesizer | | **PDF Presentation** | Report generation | Formats the combined output as a professional PDF | ## The Flow ``` +-----------+ | INPUT | | idea/path | +-----+-----+ | +----------+----------+ | | +-----v-----+ +-----v-----+ | ARCHITECT | | COUNCIL | | (parallel)| | (parallel)| +-----+-----+ +-----+-----+ | | | | +-----+-----+ | +-----+-----+ | | 6 business | | | 8 life | | | evaluators | | | advisors | | +-----+-----+ | +-----+-----+ | | | | | +-----v-----+ | +-----v-----+ | | Architect | | | Council | | | Synthesizer| | | Synthesizer| | +-----+-----+ | +-----+-----+ | | | | | +-----+-----+-------+ | | | +-----v-----------+ | | META-SYNTHESIZER | | | Cross-reference | | | both outputs | | +---------+-------+ | | | +-----v-----+ | | PDF | | | REPORT | | +-----------+ | ``` ### Step 1: Parse Input Detect whether the input is: - **New idea**: A description, concept, or question (e.g., "AI-powered meal planning app") - **Existing project**: A path to a codebase (e.g., `/home/user/my-saas-project`) - **Life decision**: A personal question with strategic dimensions (e.g., "Should I quit my job to build this?") ### Step 2: Dispatch Architect (Strategic Evaluation) Run the Architect system with all 6 evaluators in parallel: 1. **Risk Assessor** -- Always included. Identifies critical, significant, and monitoring-level risks. 2. **Technical Architect** -- Auto-included for software ideas. Evaluates feasibility, architecture, stack choices. 3. **Market Analyst** -- Auto-included for revenue-generating ideas. TAM/SAM/SOM, competitive landscape, monetization. 4. **Impact Evaluator** -- Social, educational, and community impact assessment. 5. **Resource Strategist** -- Cost-benefit analysis, timeline, team requirements, bootstrapping viability. 6. **Innovation Scout** -- Technology readiness, first-mover advantage, adjacent possible opportunities. The Architect Synthesizer combines these into: - **Value Matrix**: Commercial / Educational / Social scores (each 1-10) - **Opportunity Score**: Overall 1-10 with 6 sub-scores - **Risk Assessment**: GO / CONDITIONAL GO / NO-GO - **Architecture Proposal**: For software ideas - **Prioritized Next Steps**: Maximum 7 actions ### Step 3: Dispatch Council (Personal Evaluation) Run the Council system with all 8 advisors in parallel: 1. **Life Coach** -- Values alignment, life balance, holistic direction 2. **Finance Advisor** -- Budget impact, runway, cash flow, investment risk 3. **Health Advisor** -- Physical/mental health implications, burnout risk, sustainability 4. **Career Advisor** -- Career trajectory, skill development, positioning, network effects 5. **Learning Advisor** -- Skill gaps, learning curve, educational investment required 6. **Systems Advisor** -- Time management, workflow impact, automation opportunities 7. **Relationships Advisor** -- Social impact, family considerations, collaboration dynamics 8. **Creative Advisor** -- Creative fulfillment, innovation alignment, aesthetic satisfaction The Council Synthesizer combines these into: - **Life Impact Assessment**: How this decision affects all life domains - **Key Synergies**: Actions that serve multiple personal domains - **Conflicts Resolved**: Where advisors disagreed - **Prioritized Action Plan**: Maximum 7 actions - **Watch List**: Items to monitor ### Step 4: Meta-Synthesis The **Meta-Synthesizer** (see `agents/meta-synthesizer.md`) receives both outputs and: 1. **Identifies alignment** -- Where strategic opportunity and personal readiness both say "go" (strong signal) 2. **Identifies conflicts** -- Where the opportunity is great but personal circumstances say "wait" (or vice versa) 3. **Produces conditions** -- Specific requirements that must be met before proceeding 4. **Generates a narrative** -- Connects the strategic and personal dimensions into a coherent story 5. **Issues a combined verdict** -- GO / CONDITIONAL GO / NOT NOW / NO-GO with clear reasoning ### Step 5: Generate PDF Report Use the pdf-presentation skill to format the combined output as a professional document: - Title page with the idea/project name and date - Executive Summary (meta-synthesis verdict) - Strategic Assessment section (Architect output: Value Matrix, Opportunity Score, Risk Assessment) - Personal Assessment section (Council output: Life Impact, Action Plan) - Cross-Reference Analysis (Meta-Synthesizer: alignments, conflicts, conditions) - Combined Next Steps (merged and deduplicated from both systems) ## Example Output Given the input: **"Should I quit my job to build an AI-powered meal planning app?"** ### Meta-Synthesis Verdict ``` VERDICT: CONDITIONAL GO The opportunity scores 7.5/10 strategically -- strong market demand, feasible technology, and good resource efficiency. However, the personal assessment reveals critical constraints that require a phased approach. CONFLICTS IDENTIFIED: - Market Analyst says "move fast, the window is 12-18 months" but Finance Advisor flags only 3 months of personal runway - Innovation Scout says "first-mover advantage is real" but Health Advisor flags existing burnout indicators from current role - Career Advisor notes this aligns with long-term trajectory but Relationships Advisor flags the strain of a startup on family commitments CONDITIONS FOR GO: 1. Validate the idea for 3 months while still employed (evenings/weekends MVP) 2. Secure 9 months of runway before transitioning (current savings + 6 months) 3. Hit 50 beta users and $500 MRR before giving notice 4. Establish a hard stop date: if conditions not met in 6 months, reassess COMBINED SCORE: 6.8/10 (strategic 7.5 adjusted down by personal constraints) NARRATIVE: The idea has genuine merit -- the meal planning space is growing, AI personalization is a defensible differentiator, and your technical skills are a strong fit. But your current personal situation (limited runway, burnout risk, family commitments) means an immediate leap would be reckless. The smart play is a structured transition: validate while employed, build runway, then make the jump with evidence and a safety net. ``` ### Value Matrix (from Architect) ``` | Dimension | Score | Key Driver | |------------------------|-------|-----------------------------------------------| | Commercial | 7/10 | $4B meal kit market, AI personalization moat | | Educational | 6/10 | ML/nutrition knowledge transfer | | Social | 7/10 | Addresses food waste and dietary health | | Technical Feasibility | 8/10 | Proven tech stack, APIs available | | Risk Level | 6/10 | Competitive market, regulatory (nutrition) | | Resource Efficiency | 8/10 | Solo MVP viable, low infrastructure cost | ``` ### Life Impact Assessment (from Council) ``` | Domain | Impact | Key Concern | |----------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------| | Finance | HIGH | 3 months runway insufficient for startup | | Health | HIGH | Burnout risk -- current role already draining | | Career | POSITIVE | Aligns with ML/product trajectory | | Relationships | MODERATE | Startup hours strain family time | | Learning | POSITIVE | Deep ML and nutrition domain knowledge | | Creative | HIGH | Strong creative fulfillment potential | ``` ## Error Handling The system is designed to be resilient when individual components encounter issues: ### If Architect Fails Partially - If 1-2 evaluators fail, the Architect Synthesizer proceeds with available evaluators and notes gaps in its output - The Meta-Synthesizer marks affected dimensions as "insufficient data" and lowers confidence - The PDF report includes a notice about which evaluators were unavailable ### If Council Fails Partially - If 1-2 advisors fail, the Council Synthesizer proceeds with available advisors and notes gaps - The Meta-Synthesizer adjusts confidence and flags uncovered personal domains - Critical failures (Life Coach or Finance) trigger a warning in the final verdict ### If Architect Fails Completely - The Meta-Synthesizer produces a personal-only assessment with a clear disclaimer - The verdict is marked "INCOMPLETE -- strategic assessment unavailable" - The PDF report omits the Strategic Assessment section ### If Council Fails Completely - The Meta-Synthesizer produces a strategic-only assessment with a clear disclaimer - The verdict is marked "INCOMPLETE -- personal assessment unavailable" - The PDF report omits the Personal Assessment section ### If PDF Generation Fails - The full evaluation results are displayed in the terminal as formatted text - A markdown file is saved as a fallback ## Language All evaluators, advisors, synthesizers, and the meta-synthesizer respond in the same language the user writes in. The entire evaluation — including the PDF report — is produced in the user's language. Matched automatically without asking. ## Structure ``` full-eval-skill/ ├── SKILL.md # This file ├── agents/ │ └── meta-synthesizer.md # Cross-references architect + council outputs ├── .claude-plugin/plugin.json # Plugin metadata ├── README.md # Installation and usage guide ├── LICENSE # MIT License └── .gitignore ``` ## Source & license This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code. - **Author:** [JuanMarchetto](https://github.com/JuanMarchetto) - **Source:** [JuanMarchetto/agent-skills](https://github.com/JuanMarchetto/agent-skills) - **License:** MIT - **Homepage:** https://github.com/JuanMarchetto/agent-skills Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above. ## Pricing - **Free** — Free ## Security capabilities Automated source analysis of v0.1.0 — what this tool can access: - **Network access:** no - **Filesystem access:** no - **Shell / process execution:** no - **Environment & secrets:** no - **Dynamic code execution:** no *"Yes" means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it is unsafe.* ## Versions - **0.1.0** — security scan: passed — Imported from the upstream source. ## Links - Listing page: https://agentstack.voostack.com/l/skill-juanmarchetto-agent-skills-full-eval - Seller: https://agentstack.voostack.com/s/juanmarchetto - Browse the marketplace: https://agentstack.voostack.com/browse --- Listed on AgentStack — the marketplace for AI agent skills and MCP servers. Every listing is security-reviewed. Creators keep 70%.