# Sport Geography Review Bibliometric > Use for geography + sport science review manuscripts and bibliometric/scientometric papers, especially topics involving sports parks, sports facilities, active recreation infrastructure, urban parks, green space exposure, green equity, heat exposure, urban health, environmental justice, accessibility, spatial equity, CiteSpace, VOSviewer, bibliometrix, PRISMA, systematic review, scoping review, c… - **Type:** Skill - **Install:** `agentstack add skill-lzy599775-agent-auto-sci-skills-sport-geography-review-bibliometric` - **Verified:** Yes — security-reviewed for prompt injection and unsafe behavior - **Seller:** [Lzy599775](https://agentstack.voostack.com/s/lzy599775) - **Installs:** 0 - **Category:** [Agent Skills](https://agentstack.voostack.com/c/agent-skills) - **Latest version:** 0.1.0 - **License:** MIT - **Upstream author:** [Lzy599775](https://github.com/Lzy599775) - **Source:** https://github.com/Lzy599775/agent-auto-sci-skills/tree/main/skills/sport-geography-review-bibliometric - **Website:** https://lzy599775.github.io/agent-auto-sci-skills/ ## Install ```sh agentstack add skill-lzy599775-agent-auto-sci-skills-sport-geography-review-bibliometric ``` Requires the [AgentStack CLI](https://agentstack.voostack.com/docs/cli). Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and any MCP-compatible agent. ## About # Sport Geography Review Bibliometric This skill supports systematic reviews, scoping reviews, critical reviews, and bibliometric/scientometric manuscripts in sport geography and urban health geography. It is designed for work that combines sports facilities, parks, green/heat exposure, accessibility, equity, spatial justice, and planning implications. Use it to move from a broad topic and paper corpus to a journal-positioned review manuscript with reproducible search logic, defensible coding, meaningful bibliometric maps, and a policy agenda. ## Core Contract Do not treat bibliometrics as the contribution. The contribution must be one of: - a clarified concept boundary; - a systematic evidence map; - a method evolution framework; - a justice/equity coding framework; - a journal-fit planning or policy agenda; - a combined review + bibliometric route that explains why the field matters. Default argument chain: `public health and active living pressure -> unequal spatial opportunity -> exposure/accessibility measurement gap -> evidence synthesis -> method and justice framework -> planning agenda` ## Fast Workflow 1. **Position the manuscript** - Decide whether the paper is a systematic review, scoping review, bibliometric review, or hybrid review. - Choose one target route: SCS/Cities, landscape-green-space journals, health-exposure journals, or broader geography/planning journals. - Read `references/00_skill_design_principles.md` when updating the skill itself. - Read `references/01_positioning_and_journal_route.md`. 2. **Define scope and search logic** - Separate object terms, exposure/accessibility terms, equity/justice terms, health/activity terms, and exclusions. - Use WoS + Scopus by default for bibliometrics; add PubMed/SPORTDiscus/Dimensions only when the research question needs health or sport coverage. - Read `references/02_search_prisma_protocol.md`. 3. **Build the evidence corpus** - Document search date, database, query, filters, de-duplication, and screening reasons. - Keep OA/non-OA status, DOI, journal, partition label, and manual-download status separate from inclusion decisions. - Use `assets/PRISMA筛选记录模板.xlsx` and `assets/文献批判性编码模板.xlsx`. 4. **Run bibliometric analysis only after scope is stable** - Use bibliometrix for performance analysis and thematic evolution. - Use VOSviewer for co-authorship, keyword co-occurrence, citation/co-citation, and overlay maps. - Use CiteSpace for burst references, timeline clusters, and turning points. - Read `references/03_bibliometric_workflow.md`. 5. **Add critical manual coding** - Code facility type, exposure metric, spatial scale, method family, population group, justice dimension, health pathway, and planning implication. - Use coding to answer what bibliometrics cannot answer. - Read `references/04_critical_coding_framework.md`. 6. **Draft the manuscript** - Make the review argument-led, not article-by-article. - Use bibliometric figures as evidence for field evolution, not decoration. - Translate findings into planning, governance, and equity implications. - Read `references/05_manuscript_structure.md` and `references/06_figures_tables_policy_agenda.md`. - For reusable writing prompts, prompt chains, reviewer audits, and policy-agenda prompts, read `references/09_prompt_library.md`. - For target-journal review and bibliometric paper patterns, read `references/10_top_journal_review_patterns.md`. 7. **Audit before completion** - Verify every citation and DOI used in the manuscript. - Check whether journal partition labels are current using the user's institution access to JCR/CAS. - Make sure the final narrative does not overclaim health benefit from exposure or accessibility. - Read `references/07_quality_checks.md`. For end-to-end projects, this skill owns literature-search reproducibility, screening, high-impact paper classification, paper-level extraction, literature matrix, evidence gap taxonomy, PRISMA records, bibliometric figures, and critical coding. Handoff stable gaps and evidence maps to `agent-auto-sci-methodology` and `agent-auto-sci-scicomm`. ## Local Corpus When available, use the user's curated local corpus as evidence: - `/00_表格与清单/中文分类整理总表_含PDF匹配与下一步路线.xlsx` - `/02_PDF文本提取与匹配索引/全文结构索引_48篇.csv` - `/03_下一步精读与Skill建设路线.md` - `/02_PDF文本提取与匹配索引/prompt手册_提取文本.txt` Read `references/08_local_corpus_guide.md` before using these files. ## Scripts - `scripts/create_review_templates.py`: create PRISMA, critical coding, claim-evidence, and journal-positioning templates in a chosen output directory. - `scripts/audit_review_library.py`: audit a local review library folder for expected tables, PDFs, extracted text, and DOI-match counts. ## Must Not Do - Do not use "sports park exposure" as the only topic if the corpus is actually green/open/sport space equity. - Do not equate accessibility with actual use. - Do not equate exposure with health benefit. - Do not equate equality with equity or justice. - Do not rely only on VOSviewer/CiteSpace screenshots for high-impact journals. - Do not present JCR/CAS partition labels as confirmed unless the user has verified them from a current official source. - Do not write a review as one-paper-at-a-time summaries; synthesize by concept, method, population, and planning implication. ## Source & license This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code. - **Author:** [Lzy599775](https://github.com/Lzy599775) - **Source:** [Lzy599775/agent-auto-sci-skills](https://github.com/Lzy599775/agent-auto-sci-skills) - **License:** MIT - **Homepage:** https://lzy599775.github.io/agent-auto-sci-skills/ Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above. ## Pricing - **Free** — Free ## Security capabilities Automated source analysis of v0.1.0 — what this tool can access: - **Network access:** no - **Filesystem access:** no - **Shell / process execution:** no - **Environment & secrets:** no - **Dynamic code execution:** no *"Yes" means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it is unsafe.* ## Versions - **0.1.0** — security scan: passed — Imported from the upstream source. ## Links - Listing page: https://agentstack.voostack.com/l/skill-lzy599775-agent-auto-sci-skills-sport-geography-review-bibliometric - Seller: https://agentstack.voostack.com/s/lzy599775 - Browse the marketplace: https://agentstack.voostack.com/browse --- Listed on AgentStack — the marketplace for AI agent skills and MCP servers. Every listing is security-reviewed. Creators keep 70%.