# Status Updates

> >-

- **Type:** Skill
- **Install:** `agentstack add skill-michaelsvanbeek-personal-agent-skills-status-updates`
- **Verified:** Yes — security-reviewed for prompt injection and unsafe behavior
- **Seller:** [michaelsvanbeek](https://agentstack.voostack.com/s/michaelsvanbeek)
- **Installs:** 0
- **Category:** [Agent Skills](https://agentstack.voostack.com/c/agent-skills)
- **Latest version:** 0.1.0
- **License:** MIT
- **Upstream author:** [michaelsvanbeek](https://github.com/michaelsvanbeek)
- **Source:** https://github.com/michaelsvanbeek/personal-agent-skills/tree/main/skills/status-updates

## Install

```sh
agentstack add skill-michaelsvanbeek-personal-agent-skills-status-updates
```

Requires the [AgentStack CLI](https://agentstack.voostack.com/docs/cli). Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and any MCP-compatible agent.

## About

# Status Updates

## When to Use

- Writing a weekly status update for your manager or skip-level
- Preparing a monthly team summary for stakeholders
- Drafting a quarterly review for leadership
- Sharing progress with peer teams
- Communicating project health to non-technical stakeholders
- Creating a standard update format for your team

---

## Core Principles

1. **Lead with outcomes, not activities** — "Reduced onboarding time by 40%" beats "Worked on onboarding improvements"
2. **Audience-appropriate detail** — Executives want headlines and risks. Peers want context. Your team wants specifics.
3. **Signal risks early** — An update that hides problems is worse than no update at all
4. **Consistent cadence** — Same day, same format, every cycle. Predictability builds trust.
5. **Concise** — If your status update takes more than 5 minutes to read, it's too long

---

## Weekly Status Update

**Audience**: Your manager, skip-level, peer leads
**Cadence**: Every Friday (or Monday morning)
**Length**: 10–15 lines max

### Template

```markdown
## Weekly Update — [Team Name] — Week of [Date]

### Highlights
- [Outcome or milestone achieved]
- [Outcome or milestone achieved]

### In Progress
- [Initiative] — [brief status, % complete or sprint target]
- [Initiative] — [brief status]

### Risks / Blockers
- [Risk] — [impact and mitigation plan]
- [Blocker] — [who/what is needed to unblock]

### Asks
- [Specific request with context — decision needed, resource needed, escalation]

### Next Week
- [What the team will focus on]
```

### Guidelines

- **Highlights**: Max 3 items. These should be things your manager can pass upward.
- **Risks**: Never zero. If you can't think of any, you're not looking hard enough. "No risks" signals a lack of awareness, not a perfect sprint.
- **Asks**: Be specific. "Need a decision on X by Wednesday" is actionable. "Need help" is not.

---

## Monthly Summary

**Audience**: Director/VP level, cross-functional stakeholders
**Cadence**: End of each month
**Length**: 1 page

### Template

```markdown
## Monthly Summary — [Team Name] — [Month YYYY]

### Key Outcomes
1. [Measurable outcome with business impact]
2. [Measurable outcome with business impact]
3. [Measurable outcome with business impact]

### OKR Progress
| Objective | KR | Current | Target | Status |
|-----------|-----|---------|--------|--------|
| ... | ... | ... | ... | 🟢 On Track / 🟡 At Risk / 🔴 Off Track |

### Metrics
| Metric | Last Month | This Month | Trend |
|--------|-----------|------------|-------|
| Sprint velocity | ... | ... | ↑/↓/→ |
| Escaped defects | ... | ... | |
| PR cycle time | ... | ... | |

### Risks and Mitigations
| Risk | Status | Mitigation |
|------|--------|-----------|
| ... | New / Active / Resolved | ... |

### Team Health
Brief note on team morale, capacity changes, hiring status.

### Next Month Focus
Top 2–3 priorities for the upcoming month.
```

---

## Quarterly Review

**Audience**: VP/C-level, org leadership
**Cadence**: End of each quarter
**Length**: 2–3 pages or a short deck (5–8 slides)

### Template

```markdown
## Q[N] Review — [Team Name]

### TL;DR
3-sentence executive summary: what we achieved, what we missed, what's next.

### Scorecard
| Objective | Score | Highlights |
|-----------|-------|-----------|
| ... | 0.X | ... |
Overall: X.XX / 1.0

### Key Wins
- [Win with quantified impact]
- [Win with quantified impact]

### Key Misses
- [Miss with root cause and lesson learned]

### Delivery Metrics
| Metric | Q[N-1] | Q[N] | Trend |
|--------|--------|------|-------|
| Features shipped | ... | ... | |
| Incidents (P1/P2) | ... | ... | |
| Velocity (avg) | ... | ... | |

### Risks and Outlook
Active risks heading into next quarter.

### Next Quarter Preview
Top 3 themes or initiatives for Q[N+1].
```

---

## Communicating to Different Audiences

### Upward (Your Manager, VP, Exec)

- **Lead with impact**: Business outcomes, metrics, customer impact
- **Be concise**: 5 bullets, not 5 paragraphs
- **Surface risks**: They want to know what might break, not just what's going well
- **Make asks explicit**: Don't hint — state what you need clearly
- **Use their language**: Revenue, retention, velocity-to-market — not story points or tech jargon

### Lateral (Peer leads, PMs, adjacent teams)

- **Focus on dependencies**: What you need from them, what they need from you
- **Share context**: They don't have your team's full picture
- **Flag shared risks**: Especially cross-team blockers
- **Be transparent about capacity**: If you can't take on their request, say so clearly

### Downward (Your Team)

- **Be transparent**: Share company context, org decisions, reasons behind priorities
- **Celebrate wins**: Public recognition in team channels
- **Be honest about challenges**: Don't sugarcoat — the team knows when things are hard
- **Show how their work connects**: "This feature directly supports the company OKR on retention"

---

## Delivery Channel

| Update Type | Channel | Format |
|-------------|---------|--------|
| Weekly | Team chat (channel + manager DM) or email | Text with clear sections |
| Monthly | Email + shared wiki page | Longer-form with tables |
| Quarterly | Wiki doc + presentation | Document + slides for review meeting |
| Ad hoc (incident, launch) | Chat + email | Brief, factual, with next steps |

---

## Anti-Patterns

| Anti-Pattern | Problem | Better Approach |
|-------------|---------|----------------|
| Activity log | "Worked on X" tells nothing about progress | State outcomes: "Shipped X, reducing Y by Z%" |
| No risks section | Signals unawareness or avoidance | Always include at least one risk or watch item |
| Buried asks | Buries what you need in a wall of text | Surface asks in their own section at the top |
| One-size-fits-all | Same update sent to execs and the team | Tailor format and depth by audience |
| Inconsistent cadence | Updates come randomly, not on schedule | Pick a day, stick to it every week |

## Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

- **Author:** [michaelsvanbeek](https://github.com/michaelsvanbeek)
- **Source:** [michaelsvanbeek/personal-agent-skills](https://github.com/michaelsvanbeek/personal-agent-skills)
- **License:** MIT

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

## Pricing

- **Free** — Free

## Security capabilities

Automated source analysis of v0.1.0 — what this tool can access:

- **Network access:** no
- **Filesystem access:** no
- **Shell / process execution:** no
- **Environment & secrets:** no
- **Dynamic code execution:** no

*"Yes" means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it is unsafe.*


## Versions

- **0.1.0** — security scan: passed — Imported from the upstream source.

## Links

- Listing page: https://agentstack.voostack.com/l/skill-michaelsvanbeek-personal-agent-skills-status-updates
- Seller: https://agentstack.voostack.com/s/michaelsvanbeek
- Browse the marketplace: https://agentstack.voostack.com/browse

---
Listed on AgentStack — the marketplace for AI agent skills and MCP servers. Every listing is security-reviewed. Creators keep 70%.
