# Test Strategy Gap Review

> Use when the main question is whether current verification is sufficient for a change, which test layers are missing, and where the smallest high-value regression protection should be added.

- **Type:** Skill
- **Install:** `agentstack add skill-motao123-dev-workflow-kit-test-strategy-gap-review`
- **Verified:** Yes — security-reviewed for prompt injection and unsafe behavior
- **Seller:** [motao123](https://agentstack.voostack.com/s/motao123)
- **Installs:** 0
- **Category:** [Cloud & Infrastructure](https://agentstack.voostack.com/c/cloud-infrastructure)
- **Latest version:** 0.1.0
- **License:** MIT
- **Upstream author:** [motao123](https://github.com/motao123)
- **Source:** https://github.com/motao123/dev-workflow-kit/tree/main/test-strategy-gap-review
- **Website:** https://motao123.github.io/dev-workflow-kit/

## Install

```sh
agentstack add skill-motao123-dev-workflow-kit-test-strategy-gap-review
```

Requires the [AgentStack CLI](https://agentstack.voostack.com/docs/cli). Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and any MCP-compatible agent.

## About

# Test Strategy Gap Review

Use this skill when the issue is not a failing test, but uncertainty about whether the current test strategy is strong enough.

## Trigger Conditions

Use this skill when:
- the user asks what tests are missing
- a risky change has weak or uneven verification coverage
- the team is unsure whether to add unit, integration, contract, browser, or smoke coverage
- the change is hard to ship confidently because test coverage feels incomplete
- there is concern that current tests exist but do not protect the right behaviors

Do not use this skill for root-cause debugging of a failing test or for CI triage when the failure is already known.

## Workflow

1. Identify the change and its highest-risk behaviors.
2. Review existing verification surfaces.
3. Identify missing or weak coverage layers.
4. Separate must-add coverage from nice-to-have coverage.
5. Recommend the smallest high-value additions.
6. Suggest the next verification or implementation step.

## Output

For non-trivial work, provide:
- current verification picture
- missing or weak test layers
- highest-risk blind spots
- smallest useful coverage additions
- recommended next step

## Coordination

After test strategy review:
- use `change-impact-analysis` if the affected surface is still unclear
- move into the active implementation workflow to add or adjust verification
- use `ship-readiness` when test coverage is the last release blocker

## Invocation Examples

- "Use test-strategy-gap-review to tell me what coverage is missing before we merge this change."
- "Use test-strategy-gap-review to decide whether this needs unit, integration, or browser checks."
- "Use test-strategy-gap-review because the current tests exist, but I don't trust that they cover the risky behavior."

## Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

- **Author:** [motao123](https://github.com/motao123)
- **Source:** [motao123/dev-workflow-kit](https://github.com/motao123/dev-workflow-kit)
- **License:** MIT
- **Homepage:** https://motao123.github.io/dev-workflow-kit/

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

## Pricing

- **Free** — Free

## Security capabilities

Automated source analysis of v0.1.0 — what this tool can access:

- **Network access:** no
- **Filesystem access:** no
- **Shell / process execution:** no
- **Environment & secrets:** no
- **Dynamic code execution:** no

*"Yes" means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it is unsafe.*


## Versions

- **0.1.0** — security scan: passed — Imported from the upstream source.

## Links

- Listing page: https://agentstack.voostack.com/l/skill-motao123-dev-workflow-kit-test-strategy-gap-review
- Seller: https://agentstack.voostack.com/s/motao123
- Browse the marketplace: https://agentstack.voostack.com/browse

---
Listed on AgentStack — the marketplace for AI agent skills and MCP servers. Every listing is security-reviewed. Creators keep 70%.