# Planr Cto Review

> Produce a grounded technology and delivery-risk review for an Operate cycle. Use when architecture, reliability, security, or execution risk needs a CTO lens.

- **Type:** Skill
- **Install:** `agentstack add skill-openplanr-openplanr-planr-cto-review`
- **Verified:** Yes — security-reviewed for prompt injection and unsafe behavior
- **Seller:** [openplanr](https://agentstack.voostack.com/s/openplanr)
- **Installs:** 0
- **Category:** [Developer Tools](https://agentstack.voostack.com/c/developer-tools)
- **Latest version:** 0.1.0
- **License:** MIT
- **Upstream author:** [openplanr](https://github.com/openplanr)
- **Source:** https://github.com/openplanr/OpenPlanr/tree/main/skills/planr-cto-review
- **Website:** https://openplanr.dev

## Install

```sh
agentstack add skill-openplanr-openplanr-planr-cto-review
```

Requires the [AgentStack CLI](https://agentstack.voostack.com/docs/cli). Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and any MCP-compatible agent.

## About

# CTO review (`technology-risk`)

## Shared contract

Read [the shared advisor contract](references/operate-advisor-contract.md) before reviewing. It
owns the common context method, grounding standard, output schema, and optional local validator.

## Role identity

- Executive label: `CTO`
- Role ID: `technology-risk`
- Scope: Technology leverage, architecture, security, delivery risk, and technical constraints.
- Capability ceiling: `read-only`

## Questions this lens must cover

1. Which technical constraints now block a stated objective?
2. Which technical risks are most decision-relevant from current evidence, and which remain
   unranked because no common comparison exists?
3. Which architectural decision is being made implicitly by in-flight work?
4. How reversible are the highest-impact evidenced changes?

## Evidence to seek

- Current repository, architecture, infrastructure, CI, security, and deployment evidence.
- Incidents, failed releases, recovery notes, test results, and production-readiness records.
- Exposure, affected surface, control state, reversibility, and the objective each constraint blocks.

## Decision standard

- A risk names likelihood or observed frequency, impact, exposure, and reversibility.
- Separate an observed failure from an inferred future risk.
- Do not present architectural preference or generic technical debt as business risk.
- Surface evidence-backed security and operational risks even when no portfolio-wide ranking can
  be established.

## Outside this lens

Code-level refactoring instructions, product prioritization, campaign decisions, and authority to
operate production systems.

## Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

- **Author:** [openplanr](https://github.com/openplanr)
- **Source:** [openplanr/OpenPlanr](https://github.com/openplanr/OpenPlanr)
- **License:** MIT
- **Homepage:** https://openplanr.dev

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

## Pricing

- **Free** — Free

## Security capabilities

Automated source analysis of v0.1.0 — what this tool can access:

- **Network access:** no
- **Filesystem access:** no
- **Shell / process execution:** no
- **Environment & secrets:** no
- **Dynamic code execution:** no

*"Yes" means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it is unsafe.*


## Versions

- **0.1.0** — security scan: passed — Imported from the upstream source.

## Links

- Listing page: https://agentstack.voostack.com/l/skill-openplanr-openplanr-planr-cto-review
- Seller: https://agentstack.voostack.com/s/openplanr
- Browse the marketplace: https://agentstack.voostack.com/browse

---
Listed on AgentStack — the marketplace for AI agent skills and MCP servers. Every listing is security-reviewed. Creators keep 70%.