# Planr Plan Review

> Review an OpenPlanr plan for product, engineering, design, and developer-experience problems. Use after planning and before implementation to improve the plan.

- **Type:** Skill
- **Install:** `agentstack add skill-openplanr-openplanr-planr-plan-review`
- **Verified:** Yes — security-reviewed for prompt injection and unsafe behavior
- **Seller:** [openplanr](https://agentstack.voostack.com/s/openplanr)
- **Installs:** 0
- **Category:** [Developer Tools](https://agentstack.voostack.com/c/developer-tools)
- **Latest version:** 0.1.0
- **License:** MIT
- **Upstream author:** [openplanr](https://github.com/openplanr)
- **Source:** https://github.com/openplanr/OpenPlanr/tree/main/skills/planr-plan-review
- **Website:** https://openplanr.dev

## Install

```sh
agentstack add skill-openplanr-openplanr-planr-plan-review
```

Requires the [AgentStack CLI](https://agentstack.voostack.com/docs/cli). Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and any MCP-compatible agent.

## About

# Planr Plan Review

Give the plan a senior, practical review. Read the plan, its repository context,
and the decisions it depends on. Use only the review lenses relevant to the
work; do not manufacture a fixed committee.

## Review

- Check that the outcome and user value are clear and measurable.
- Check scope, sequencing, ownership, architecture, migration, security,
  operability, testing, and rollback in proportion to the change.
- Check the first-run and everyday developer experience, including setup,
  diagnostics, defaults, and recovery.
- Prefer concrete corrections over abstract criticism. Name the affected plan
  section and the change that would resolve each material issue.
- Use subagents or tools when they improve the review, but return one coherent
  result rather than their raw transcripts.

Ask through the host's native structured question UI only when a missing answer
would materially change the review. Otherwise state the assumption and continue.

## Output

Lead with one verdict: `ready`, `ready with improvements`, or `needs revision`.
Then report:

1. Must fix — only issues that would make the implementation wrong or unsafe.
2. Improvements — worthwhile changes that are not blockers.
3. Decisions and assumptions — unresolved choices with a recommended default.
4. Next action — the smallest useful next step.

Return the useful findings directly. Revisit the review when the user asks or
the plan materially changes.

## Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

- **Author:** [openplanr](https://github.com/openplanr)
- **Source:** [openplanr/OpenPlanr](https://github.com/openplanr/OpenPlanr)
- **License:** MIT
- **Homepage:** https://openplanr.dev

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

## Pricing

- **Free** — Free

## Security capabilities

Automated source analysis of v0.1.0 — what this tool can access:

- **Network access:** no
- **Filesystem access:** no
- **Shell / process execution:** no
- **Environment & secrets:** no
- **Dynamic code execution:** no

*"Yes" means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it is unsafe.*


## Versions

- **0.1.0** — security scan: passed — Imported from the upstream source.

## Links

- Listing page: https://agentstack.voostack.com/l/skill-openplanr-openplanr-planr-plan-review
- Seller: https://agentstack.voostack.com/s/openplanr
- Browse the marketplace: https://agentstack.voostack.com/browse

---
Listed on AgentStack — the marketplace for AI agent skills and MCP servers. Every listing is security-reviewed. Creators keep 70%.