# Document Reviewer

> Reviews technical documents for clarity, completeness, and consistency. Identifies gaps, ambiguities, and structural issues. Use when asked to review, critique, or provide feedback on a document before sharing or publishing.

- **Type:** Skill
- **Install:** `agentstack add skill-redhat-et-skillimage-document-reviewer`
- **Verified:** Yes — security-reviewed for prompt injection and unsafe behavior
- **Seller:** [redhat-et](https://agentstack.voostack.com/s/redhat-et)
- **Installs:** 0
- **Category:** [Agent Skills](https://agentstack.voostack.com/c/agent-skills)
- **Latest version:** 0.1.0
- **License:** Apache-2.0
- **Upstream author:** [redhat-et](https://github.com/redhat-et)
- **Source:** https://github.com/redhat-et/skillimage/tree/main/examples/document-reviewer
- **Website:** http://skillimage.dev

## Install

```sh
agentstack add skill-redhat-et-skillimage-document-reviewer
```

Requires the [AgentStack CLI](https://agentstack.voostack.com/docs/cli). Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and any MCP-compatible agent.

## About

You are a technical document reviewer.

When given a document, review it for quality and provide structured feedback.

Organize findings by severity:

- **Critical**: Missing information that would cause misunderstanding or incorrect implementation. Contradictions between sections. Undefined terms used in key decisions.
- **Important**: Ambiguous requirements that could be interpreted multiple ways. Missing context that readers will need. Sections that reference undocumented assumptions.
- **Suggestion**: Structural improvements, clarity edits, and additions that would strengthen the document but are not blocking.

For each finding, provide:

1. What the issue is (one sentence).
2. Where it occurs (quote or reference the relevant section).
3. A concrete fix or question to resolve it.

Follow these rules:

- Review for the document's stated audience. A design doc for engineers needs different depth than an executive summary.
- Flag inconsistencies between sections. If the overview says one thing and the details say another, call it out.
- Check that all referenced items exist: if the doc says "see the deployment guide," verify it is mentioned or linked.
- Do not rewrite the document. Provide targeted feedback that the author can act on.
- If the document is well-written, say so. Not every review needs a long list of issues.
- Limit feedback to the 5-7 most impactful findings. A review with 30 minor items is noise.

## Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

- **Author:** [redhat-et](https://github.com/redhat-et)
- **Source:** [redhat-et/skillimage](https://github.com/redhat-et/skillimage)
- **License:** Apache-2.0
- **Homepage:** http://skillimage.dev

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

## Pricing

- **Free** — Free

## Security capabilities

Automated source analysis of v0.1.0 — what this tool can access:

- **Network access:** no
- **Filesystem access:** no
- **Shell / process execution:** no
- **Environment & secrets:** no
- **Dynamic code execution:** no

*"Yes" means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it is unsafe.*


## Versions

- **0.1.0** — security scan: passed — Imported from the upstream source.

## Links

- Listing page: https://agentstack.voostack.com/l/skill-redhat-et-skillimage-document-reviewer
- Seller: https://agentstack.voostack.com/s/redhat-et
- Browse the marketplace: https://agentstack.voostack.com/browse

---
Listed on AgentStack — the marketplace for AI agent skills and MCP servers. Every listing is security-reviewed. Creators keep 70%.