# Quashing Petition Drafter > Assesses and drafts Indian petitions to quash criminal proceedings, including maintainability, grounds, interim relief and annexures. Use for an FIR, complaint, charge sheet or consequential proceeding said to disclose no offence, face a legal bar or constitute abuse of process. - **Type:** Skill - **Install:** `agentstack add skill-rohasnagpal-legal-ai-skills-quashing-petition-drafter` - **Verified:** Yes — security-reviewed for prompt injection and unsafe behavior - **Seller:** [rohasnagpal](https://agentstack.voostack.com/s/rohasnagpal) - **Installs:** 0 - **Category:** [Agent Skills](https://agentstack.voostack.com/c/agent-skills) - **Latest version:** 0.1.0 - **License:** MIT - **Upstream author:** [rohasnagpal](https://github.com/rohasnagpal) - **Source:** https://github.com/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/tree/main/plugins/criminal/skills/quashing-petition-drafter ## Install ```sh agentstack add skill-rohasnagpal-legal-ai-skills-quashing-petition-drafter ``` Requires the [AgentStack CLI](https://agentstack.voostack.com/docs/cli). Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and any MCP-compatible agent. ## About # Quashing Petition Drafter Draft an India-focused, record-bound quashing petition without converting the proceeding into a disputed-fact trial. ## Required inputs - FIR, complaint, charge sheet or police report and all challenged orders - Offence date, registration date, procedural stage and current case status - Invoked provisions, alleged acts and special statutes - Court, territorial facts, parties and petitioner status - Prior petitions, appeals, stays, settlements and connected proceedings - Desired final and interim relief Ask for missing operative documents. Do not plead from a summary when the underlying record is reasonably obtainable. ## Method 1. **Select the legal route.** Determine whether section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 through the applicable savings, or a constitutional or statutory route governs. Use offence dates, commencement, pending proceedings and savings provisions; do not assume the newest enactment applies. 2. **Check maintainability.** Verify the proper High Court, standing, alternative remedies, prior litigation, delay, procedural requirements and the effect of any special statute. Confirm current Supreme Court and controlling High Court authority from primary sources. 3. **Apply a face-value element test.** Map each alleged offence element to the allegations taken at their highest. Identify a missing legal ingredient precisely. Do not ask the court to weigh competing evidence, decide credibility or conduct a mini-trial. 4. **Test independent legal bars.** Examine sanction, limitation, jurisdiction, statutory immunity, duplication, settlement or compounding, and other express bars. State the source and factual predicate for each. 5. **Assess abuse of process.** Explain why the pleaded record, not labels alone, supports or defeats the ground. A commercial, contractual, matrimonial or civil dimension does not by itself eliminate a criminal offence. 6. **Handle settlement carefully.** Verify voluntariness, signatures and scope; distinguish compoundable and non-compoundable offences; address seriousness, victim impact, societal interest and special-statute restrictions. 7. **Build the pleading record.** Prepare parties, jurisdiction, concise facts, a dated chronology, grounds linked to record paragraphs, disclosure of prior proceedings, annexure references and a truthful verification or affidavit. 8. **Calibrate relief.** Draft the quashing prayer and only necessary consequential relief. For interim protection, identify urgency, prejudice, balance, cooperation and the exact proceedings sought to be stayed. ## Output Produce: - A maintainability and route note - A petition with synopsis, list of dates, facts, grounds and prayers - A separate interim-relief application when required - An annexure index and missing-document list - An authority table showing proposition, court, date, status and verification link - A short risk note identifying fact disputes, alternative remedies and likely objections ## Guardrails - Do not fabricate a settlement, consent, affidavit, service event, citation or procedural history. - Disclose adverse and prior orders material to maintainability; do not engineer repetitive proceedings. - Never promise quashing. Distinguish an arguable ground from a likely outcome. - Redact protected identities and sensitive personal data in public or shareable versions. - Require qualified Indian counsel to verify current law, court rules, formatting, limitation, filing and affidavit requirements before use. ## Source & license This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code. - **Author:** [rohasnagpal](https://github.com/rohasnagpal) - **Source:** [rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills](https://github.com/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills) - **License:** MIT Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above. ## Pricing - **Free** — Free ## Security capabilities Automated source analysis of v0.1.0 — what this tool can access: - **Network access:** no - **Filesystem access:** no - **Shell / process execution:** no - **Environment & secrets:** no - **Dynamic code execution:** no *"Yes" means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it is unsafe.* ## Versions - **0.1.0** — security scan: passed — Imported from the upstream source. ## Links - Listing page: https://agentstack.voostack.com/l/skill-rohasnagpal-legal-ai-skills-quashing-petition-drafter - Seller: https://agentstack.voostack.com/s/rohasnagpal - Browse the marketplace: https://agentstack.voostack.com/browse --- Listed on AgentStack — the marketplace for AI agent skills and MCP servers. Every listing is security-reviewed. Creators keep 70%.