# Select Venue

> Builds a ranked venue shortlist for a research paper. Use when the user asks where to submit, which conference or journal to target, venue selection, track selection, or mentions CORE rank, h5-index, acceptance rate, CCF class, or submission deadlines. Maps the paper's topic and contribution type (method, system, dataset, demo, vision, industrial, survey) to venue-track pairs scored on topic fit,…

- **Type:** Skill
- **Install:** `agentstack add skill-shaishavmaisuria-research-paper-lifecycle-skills-select-venue`
- **Verified:** Yes — security-reviewed for prompt injection and unsafe behavior
- **Seller:** [ShaishavMaisuria](https://agentstack.voostack.com/s/shaishavmaisuria)
- **Installs:** 0
- **Category:** [Agent Skills](https://agentstack.voostack.com/c/agent-skills)
- **Latest version:** 0.1.0
- **License:** Apache-2.0
- **Upstream author:** [ShaishavMaisuria](https://github.com/ShaishavMaisuria)
- **Source:** https://github.com/ShaishavMaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skills/tree/main/skills/select-venue
- **Website:** https://shaishavmaisuria.github.io/research-paper-lifecycle-skills/

## Install

```sh
agentstack add skill-shaishavmaisuria-research-paper-lifecycle-skills-select-venue
```

Requires the [AgentStack CLI](https://agentstack.voostack.com/docs/cli). Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and any MCP-compatible agent.

## About

# Select Venue

Turn "where should I submit this paper?" into a ranked shortlist of
venue-track pairs with scores, deadlines, page budgets, and an explicit
verification status — grounded in the repo's `venues/` profiles, not vibes.

## When to use

- The user asks where to submit a paper, for target-venue recommendations,
  or to compare candidate venues/tracks.
- The user asks "does my paper fit venue X?" or "research track or industry
  track?"
- The user mentions CORE rank, h5-index, CCF class, acceptance rates, or
  upcoming CS conference deadlines in a submission-planning context.

Not for: parsing one specific CFP into a profile (`parse-cfp`), adapting a
draft to an already-chosen venue (`tailor-to-venue`), or pre-submission
compliance checks (`preflight-check`).

## Inputs

- **Topic** — one or two sentences on what the paper is about.
- **Contribution type** — classify using `references/track-fit.md`; ask the
  user if ambiguous.
- **Constraints** — earliest realistic submission date, prestige goals
  (and whether CCF class matters), page-budget reality of the current
  draft, blind-level conflicts (e.g. an already-public preprint),
  travel/registration constraints.
- **Venue data** — `venues/conferences/*.yml` profiles (schema in
  `venues/schema.yml`), surfaced by `scripts/list_venues.py`.

## Process

1. **Elicit the inputs.** Confirm topic, contribution type, and constraints
   in one round of questions. The contribution type changes the shortlist
   more than the topic — pin it down first (`references/track-fit.md`,
   "Contribution taxonomy").

2. **Survey profiled venues.** Run:

   ```
   python3 scripts/list_venues.py
   ```

   This lists every profile with deadline proximity, blind level,
   submission system, and per-track page budgets, sorted by next upcoming
   submission deadline. Useful flags: `--upcoming-only`, `--family `,
   `--track `, `--json` (full data incl. track notes), `--today
   YYYY-MM-DD` (reproducible runs). Never compute date arithmetic by hand.
   Caveat: some venues (e.g. SIGSPATIAL) have per-track deadlines that
   differ from the top-level ones — they live in each track's `notes`
   field; read them in the `--json` output.

3. **Build the candidate set.** Combine (a) profiled venues that plausibly
   match the topic, and (b) venues you know fit the topic but have no
   profile yet. For unprofiled candidates, resolve identity via DBLP:

   ```
   CONTACT_EMAIL=you@example.org python3 scripts/dblp_venue_lookup.py search ""
   ```

   Optionally gauge venue size with
   `dblp_venue_lookup.py toc-count  `. Mark every
   unprofiled candidate clearly and suggest `parse-cfp` to profile it.
   Aim for 5-10 candidate venue-track pairs before scoring.

4. **Gather prestige signals.** For each candidate, look up CORE rank,
   h5-index, CCF class (if the user cares), and acceptance rate following
   `references/ranking-sources.md`. Hard rule: every number carries a
   source + edition/year, or is labeled "unverified — indicative" /
   "unknown". Never state a rank or acceptance rate from memory as fact,
   and never invent one.

5. **Score and rank.** Apply the 0-10 rubric in `references/track-fit.md`
   (topic fit 0-3, track fit 0-3, prestige fit 0-2, deadline feasibility
   0-2), then apply its tie-breakers and red-flag vetoes (embargoes,
   dual-submission bans, attendance mandates).

6. **Re-verify the top picks against live CFPs — mandatory.** For the top
   3 venues, fetch each profile's `cfp_url` and confirm the facts the user
   will act on: deadlines (and their timezone — AoE vs PT matters), page
   limits and what they exclude, blind level, submission system. Profiles
   are a starting point, never ground truth; a stale page limit causes a
   desk reject. Record what was verified and when in the output. If a CFP
   cannot be reached, mark that venue "NOT re-verified" — do not silently
   present profile data as confirmed.

7. **Deliver the shortlist** (format below) and offer next steps:
   `parse-cfp` for unprofiled picks, `tailor-to-venue` once a target is
   chosen, `plan-submission` for the timeline.

## Output

A ranked shortlist in chat (offer to save as `venue-shortlist.md`):

| # | Venue / track | Score | Deadline (tz) | Pages | Blind | Rank signals | Verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SIGSPATIAL 2026 / Research | 9/10 | abstract 2026-05-29, paper 2026-06-05 (PT) | 10p excl refs +2p appendix | single | CORE2023 A (verify) | live CFP 2026-06-11 |

Below the table, per venue: 2-4 lines of rationale (the four rubric scores
with one-line justifications), the red flags checked, and — for any venue
whose deadline has passed — the next expected cycle. Close with the
explicit disclaimer that the user must confirm all critical facts on the
venue's own CFP page before planning around them.

## Bundled resources

- `references/ranking-sources.md` — CORE, h5-index, acceptance rates, CCF,
  deadline aggregators: where each lives, how to interpret, how to cite.
- `references/track-fit.md` — contribution taxonomy, track archetypes,
  the scoring rubric, tie-breakers, red flags.
- `scripts/list_venues.py` — stdlib-only profile lister + deadline math.
- `scripts/dblp_venue_lookup.py` — polite DBLP venue resolver (rate-limited
  ≤1 req/s, cached under `.cache/`, needs `CONTACT_EMAIL`).

## Guardrails

- Profiles and this skill's tables are **never ground truth** — re-verify
  deadlines, page limits, and policies against the live `cfp_url` (step 6)
  and say so in the output.
- Never fabricate ranks, h5-indexes, acceptance rates, or citations; route
  any bibliographic citation through `verify-citations`.
- Never submit to, register with, or create accounts on any submission
  system on the user's behalf.
- Fetch venue/CFP pages on demand and process them transiently; do not
  copy paper abstracts or full text into the repo (metadata is fine).
- Prestige caps at 2 of 10 points by design — do not let "it's A*"
  override fit, and do not present prestige as publication advice ("aim
  lower/higher") unless the user asked for that judgment.

## Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

- **Author:** [ShaishavMaisuria](https://github.com/ShaishavMaisuria)
- **Source:** [ShaishavMaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skills](https://github.com/ShaishavMaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skills)
- **License:** Apache-2.0
- **Homepage:** https://shaishavmaisuria.github.io/research-paper-lifecycle-skills/

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

## Pricing

- **Free** — Free

## Security capabilities

Automated source analysis of v0.1.0 — what this tool can access:

- **Network access:** no
- **Filesystem access:** no
- **Shell / process execution:** no
- **Environment & secrets:** no
- **Dynamic code execution:** no

*"Yes" means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it is unsafe.*


## Versions

- **0.1.0** — security scan: passed — Imported from the upstream source.

## Links

- Listing page: https://agentstack.voostack.com/l/skill-shaishavmaisuria-research-paper-lifecycle-skills-select-venue
- Seller: https://agentstack.voostack.com/s/shaishavmaisuria
- Browse the marketplace: https://agentstack.voostack.com/browse

---
Listed on AgentStack — the marketplace for AI agent skills and MCP servers. Every listing is security-reviewed. Creators keep 70%.
