# Feature Scoping

> >-

- **Type:** Skill
- **Install:** `agentstack add skill-stanislavnianko-product-discovery-claude-skills-feature-scoping`
- **Verified:** Yes — security-reviewed for prompt injection and unsafe behavior
- **Seller:** [stanislavnianko](https://agentstack.voostack.com/s/stanislavnianko)
- **Installs:** 0
- **Category:** [Agent Skills](https://agentstack.voostack.com/c/agent-skills)
- **Latest version:** 0.1.0
- **License:** MIT
- **Upstream author:** [stanislavnianko](https://github.com/stanislavnianko)
- **Source:** https://github.com/stanislavnianko/product-discovery-claude-skills/tree/main/plugins/discovery-phase/skills/feature-scoping

## Install

```sh
agentstack add skill-stanislavnianko-product-discovery-claude-skills-feature-scoping
```

Requires the [AgentStack CLI](https://agentstack.voostack.com/docs/cli). Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and any MCP-compatible agent.

## About

# Feature Scoping

> Part of the **discovery-phase** skill pack · `scoping` group · reads `discovery-context.md` (run `profile-builder` first if missing).

The boundary-drawing skill. Output is a scope doc precise enough that engineering can estimate it and the client can sign off on it. Built to be paste-able into a proposal or SoW (commercial documents) with minimal rework.

## Step 1 — Read context

Read `discovery-context.md` (sections **3. Engagement**, **5. Expected deliverable**, **6. Constraints**), `opportunity-tree.md` (solution direction), and `risk-assumption-map.md` (top assumptions to retire).

If `discovery-context.md` is missing, ask the BA inline: "(a) timeline + budget shape (days / weeks / month / quarter); (b) any hard constraints (NDA / regulatory / tech-stack lock-in)?" — tag the output `[ASSUMED ENGAGEMENT]`. If `opportunity-tree.md` is missing, ask for solution direction in one line, or proceed tagged `[NO-SOLUTION-DIRECTION]`. If `risk-assumption-map.md` is missing, ask for 1–3 top assumptions to retire, or proceed tagged `[NO-RISK-FRAME]`. Never block; recommend `profile-builder` / `opportunity-mapping` / `risk-assumption-mapping` for high-stakes work.

## Step 2 — State the MVP job

One sentence. **"The scope lets `` do `` in ``, such that `` is retired."**

This anchors scope to assumption-retirement, not feature completeness.

## Step 3 — Draw the scope line — 11 areas

Every row must have BOTH `in` and `out`. Ambiguity is where mid-build scope creep lives. If a row is genuinely "TBD", say so explicitly with a deadline for resolution, but don't leave blanks.

| Area | In | Out |
|---|---|---|
| Users / segments | Which segment / seats | Which segments excluded |
| Core flow | The one happy path | Alternative flows |
| Auth | Existing SSO / new login | Role-based permissions |
| Data | Read / write, persistence | Migrations, historical data |
| Integrations | The 1 must-have | All others |
| UI polish | Rough / polished / designer-built | |
| Error handling | Which errors shown, which swallowed | |
| Observability | What we'll log to learn | Full prod telemetry |
| Platforms | Web / mobile / CLI | |
| Accessibility | A11y floor (e.g., keyboard-only ok, screen reader later) | |
| i18n | English-only or specific languages | |

## Step 4 — Define success metrics

Two pre-committed numbers:

- **Leading metric** — engagement signal during the build window (e.g., 40% of invited users complete core flow within 7 days)
- **Lagging metric** — the problem-canvas success signal at scope + 4 weeks

State pivot/kill thresholds (consumed by `go-nogo-memo` later).

## Step 5 — Rollout boundary

Pick one based on engagement mode (per `discovery-context.md` section 3):

- Pre-sale demo: agency-hosted, no real users
- Discovery-sprint output: client internal dogfood
- Delivery-phase MVP: 5-10 friendlies, % feature flag on real users, or separate URL/product
- Staff aug: mirror client's existing rollout pattern

Include a rollback criterion ("if metric X drops below Y in 48h, disable flag").

## Step 6 — Engineering size estimate

T-shirt: S (1 mo). If L, **loop back to Step 3** and cut. Discovery-sprint scopes should be S or M.

The actual hour-level estimate is `estimation` skill's job. This skill produces the t-shirt for early reality-check.

## Step 7 — Explicitly deferred list

5-15 bullet items titled "Explicitly deferred". This list gets referenced at every standup during build to prevent re-litigation. In a proposal/SoW context, this becomes the "Out of Scope" section.

## Step 8 — Outsourcing-specific extras

Add at bottom:

- **Assumptions of the client** (from `risk-assumption-map.md` rows tagged `[client]` or `[shared]`) — what the client must do/provide for this scope to be valid
- **Agency dependencies** — what the agency needs from third parties or other team members

These flow directly into the proposal "what we need from you" / "our dependencies" sections.

## Output

`./discovery/scope-doc.md` per `./template.md`. Designed to be reused — `proposal` and `sow-draft` skills will pull sections from here verbatim.

Append to `_log.md`: `[feature-scoping | YYYY-MM-DD] mvp_job: ; tshirt: ; deferred: ; client_assumptions: `.

## Anti-patterns

- **Scope by feature list.** Features without a user job create orphan UI. Lead with the job.
- **Open-ended MVP.** No date or success metric → not an MVP, just a build.
- **Hidden auth/data/integration changes.** "Just a small change to auth" is how 3-week projects become 3-month projects. Put it explicitly in `in` or `out`.
- **Scope identical to opportunity-tree.** OST names solutions; scope picks one slice of one solution. Same size = scope is too big.
- **Skipping assumptions/dependencies for outsourcing.** These exist in any internal scope too, but in outsourcing they become legally/commercially load-bearing. Be explicit.

## Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

- **Author:** [stanislavnianko](https://github.com/stanislavnianko)
- **Source:** [stanislavnianko/product-discovery-claude-skills](https://github.com/stanislavnianko/product-discovery-claude-skills)
- **License:** MIT

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

## Pricing

- **Free** — Free

## Security capabilities

Automated source analysis of v0.1.0 — what this tool can access:

- **Network access:** no
- **Filesystem access:** no
- **Shell / process execution:** no
- **Environment & secrets:** no
- **Dynamic code execution:** no

*"Yes" means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it is unsafe.*


## Versions

- **0.1.0** — security scan: passed — Imported from the upstream source.

## Links

- Listing page: https://agentstack.voostack.com/l/skill-stanislavnianko-product-discovery-claude-skills-feature-scoping
- Seller: https://agentstack.voostack.com/s/stanislavnianko
- Browse the marketplace: https://agentstack.voostack.com/browse

---
Listed on AgentStack — the marketplace for AI agent skills and MCP servers. Every listing is security-reviewed. Creators keep 70%.
