Install
$ agentstack add mcp-aidimag-aidimag ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
AI Dimag — Verified Memory for AI Coding Agents
Your coding agent forgets your codebase. AIDimag doesn't.
[](https://www.npmjs.com/package/aidimag) [](https://github.com/AiDimag/aidimag/actions/workflows/ci.yml) [](https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=aidimag.aidimag-vscode) [](https://plugins.jetbrains.com/plugin/33030-ai-dimag) [](https://registry.modelcontextprotocol.io/?q=aidimag) [](https://glama.ai/mcp/servers/AiDimag/aidimag) [](https://www.producthunt.com/products/ai-dimag?utmsource=other&utmmedium=social) [](./LICENSE) [](https://aidimag.com) [](https://nodejs.org)
Documentation • Why AIDimag? • Getting Started • Use Cases • Benchmarks • AI Dimag Cloud • Pricing
What is AI Dimag?
AI Dimag is a memory system for software engineering — not a general-purpose "AI memory" app. It gives any MCP-compatible agent (Claude, Cursor, Copilot, Windsurf…) a persistent memory of your codebase that survives across sessions — decisions, conventions, gotchas, failed approaches, guardrails, and reusable skills — stored as falsifiable claims with grounding evidence in .aidimag/ next to your code.
The subject of memory is your repository, not your preferences or chat history. Every capability — evidence, git-hook verification, guardrails, pre-commit checks, path-scoped recall, session scratchpad — exists to serve day-to-day development work.
🎯 The Difference: Claim-and-Verify, Not Store-and-Retrieve
Most memory systems store text and retrieve whatever is similar later — a stored fact is assumed true forever. That's dangerous in a codebase, where a confidently-retrieved stale fact is worse than no memory at all.
Every AI Dimag memory carries evidence (a shell check, an anchored commit, a test) that dim verify re-runs against the current repo — automatically, via git hooks, on every pull, checkout, and rebase. Beliefs that stop being true go STALE instead of silently misleading your AI.
✨ Works with Every AI Tool
- MCP tools (Claude, Cursor, etc.) get real-time memory via the MCP server
- Non-MCP tools (Copilot, Windsurf, etc.) get static context files (
.cursorrules,CLAUDE.md,AGENTS.md, etc.)
Install
npm install -g aidimag
Requires Node 22+. Ships two equivalent binaries: dim (short) and aidimag.
🚀 Quick Start
cd your-repo
dim init # creates .aidimag/, installs additive git hooks
dim bootstrap # optional: LLM-survey the repo into a starter memory set
dim review # approve what enters memory (nothing is stored unreviewed)
dim remember "All DB access goes through src/db/store.ts" -k INVARIANT -p src/db \
-e "STATIC_CHECK:grep -rL better-sqlite3 src --include=*.ts"
dim recall db access
dim verify # re-run all evidence; stale beliefs get flagged
dim brief # session-start briefing: in-scope memory, guardrails, gaps
# For non-MCP tools (Copilot, Cursor without MCP, etc.):
dim generate-context --format all --auto # creates .cursorrules, CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, etc.
🔌 Connect to Your AI Agent (MCP)
Add to your agent config (e.g. .mcp.json for Claude Code):
{
"mcpServers": {
"aidimag": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "aidimag", "mcp"],
"env": { "AIDIMAG_REPO": "/path/to/your/repo" }
}
}
}
MCP Tools get memory_search, memory_propose, context_note (live in-chat fact capture), chat_harvest (live, tool-agnostic session harvesting with server-side secret redaction), memory_critique (a second critic grounded in verified memory), session-start briefings, session-end extraction, and more.
Non-MCP Tools: dim generate-context -f all renders verified memory into .cursorrules, CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, .windsurfrules, and .github/copilot-instructions.md (--auto keeps them refreshed).
Hermes Agent: dim hermes install registers aidimag as a native Hermes memory provider — one command, no pip, no venv. A single stdlib-only Python bridge delegates to the MCP server: session briefings are injected into the system prompt, recall is prefetched per turn, and session learnings become review-queue proposals (never silent writes). Then: hermes config set memory.provider aidimag.
✨ Key Features
🛡️ Human-Gated Capture
Commits, PRs, AI-chat transcripts (Claude Code, Codex, Copilot, Cursor), and pasted docs are mined into proposals. Nothing enters memory until you approve it in dim review (auto-triaged best-first, approve all --min-score 0.7 for batches).
✅ Verification Lifecycle
STATIC_CHECK / COMMIT_REF / TEST_RESULT / EXEC_TRACE / HUMAN_ATTESTED evidence. Failing evidence flips memories to STALE and auto-drafts a recovery proposal. Confidence decays without re-confirmation.
🔒 Evidence Trust Gate
Shell-command evidence that arrives via team sync is never executed until you inspect and approve it (dim verify --trust).
🔍 Hybrid Semantic Recall
FTS5 keyword + vector KNN (OpenAI, local Ollama, or AWS Bedrock; auto-detected except Bedrock, which is explicit opt-in; works keyword-only with none).
🚦 Guardrails & Skills
Behavioral rules (never / ask-first / always) and step-by-step procedures, enforced by dim check (pre-commit) and memory_critique.
👥 Team Mode, Self-Hosted
dim serve + dim sync: local-first replicas, device-code login, brain-scoped API keys, hashed credentials, cross-machine verification consensus.
📚 Knowledgebase Inbox
Drop design docs / ADRs / PDFs / DOCX into knowledge/ and they're summarized into reviewed, pinned memories.
📝 Scratchpad & Provenance Audit
dim scratch (and the scratchpad_* MCP tools) hold short-term session notes — TTL-expiring, never synced, never durable memory. dim audit lists memories resting on the weakest ground (agent-authored, evidence-free, stale, or long-unverified) so you can fix them up like a dependency audit for your repo's knowledge.
🎨 Web Dashboard & Extensions
dim ui — run checks, session briefings, bootstrap, harvest, and context generation from the browser — plus VS Code and IntelliJ extensions.
🥊 How It Compares
AI Dimag follows a claim-and-verify model; other memory systems follow store-and-retrieve. The short version:
| | Conversational memory layers | Vector-store memory plugins | Hand-maintained context files | AI Dimag | |---|---|---|---|---| | Built for | Chat assistants remembering users | General recall over embedded text | Static instructions for coding agents | Coding agents in a living repo | | Unit of memory | Extracted facts / chat summaries | Embedded text chunks | Prose | Falsifiable, typed claims with evidence | | How memory gets in | Automatic capture | Automatic embedding | Manual edits | Human-gated review queue | | When the code changes | Nothing — stored facts stay "true" | Nothing | File silently rots | Evidence re-runs via git hooks; broken claims flip STALE | | Trust model | Write-time label, never re-checked | Similarity ≈ trust | "It's in the file" | Verification status + decaying confidence; trust-ranked retrieval | | Enforcement | None — injection only | None | Hope the model reads it | Guardrails + pre-commit dim check + memory_critique | | Failure mode | Confidently recalls outdated facts | Retrieves similar, true or not | Instructions drift from reality | Says "this went STALE" instead of guessing |
Full comparison: aidimag.com/comparison
vs. named tools
How aiDimag relates to the memory tools people usually ask about. These solve a different problem (remembering users and conversations); aiDimag remembers your repository and proves its memories are still true:
| | aiDimag | Mnemosyne | mem0 | Letta | Honcho | SuperMemory | Hindsight | ChromaDB | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | Subject of memory | Your codebase | Chat/agent sessions | User & agent facts | Agent's own context | User/peer reasoning | Personal + agent | Agent memory | — (vector DB) | | Local-first | ✅ SQLite per repo | ✅ SQLite | ⚠️ Hybrid | ❌ Docker+PG | ⚠️ PG+worker | ❌ SaaS | ✅ SQLite | ✅ Embedded | | MCP server | ✅ Built-in | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | | Verifies memories against code | ✅ Evidence re-runs via git hooks | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | | Human-gated writes | ✅ Review queue | ❌ Auto-capture | ❌ Auto | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | — | | Enforcement | ✅ Guardrails + pre-commit + critique | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | | Open source | ✅ MIT | ✅ MIT | ✅ Apache 2.0 | ✅ Apache 2.0 | ⚠️ AGPL | ❌ Proprietary | ✅ MIT | ✅ Apache 2.0 | | Published benchmark | Own suite: 100% staleness detection, 0% FP | BEAM 65.2% / LongMemEval 98.9% R@All@5 (self-reported) | LoCoMo | LoCoMo 83.2% | LongMemEval 90.4% | MemoryBench 85.2% | BEAM 73.4% / LongMemEval 94.6% | — |
Chat-memory benchmarks (LoCoMo, LongMemEval, BEAM) score recall over conversation histories, so they don't apply to aiDimag — its memory subject is the repo. Instead aiDimag publishes its own reproducible suite (below), including the metric none of the chat benchmarks measure: does memory notice when the code changes?
📊 Benchmarks
Reproducible performance and quality suites live in [benchmark/](./benchmark) (npm run bench, npm run bench:quality). Headline results (Apple M4, Node 24, 10,000-memory brain — full tables at aidimag.com/benchmarks):
| Metric | Result | |---|---| | FTS keyword search | 1.45ms p50 | | Vector KNN (768-dim, sqlite-vec) | 4.15ms p50 | | Memory writes (transactional, incl. FTS + event log) | ~5,400/s | | CLI cold start (dim --help) | ~41ms p50 | | Staleness detection (broken claims → STALE, real git fixture) | 100% (4/4) | | False positives (intact claims wrongly flagged) | 0% (0/4) | | Retrieval, keyword queries (Recall@1 / MRR, FTS-only) | 1.00 / 1.00 | | Retrieval, paraphrase queries (FTS-only; hybrid closes this gap) | 0.25 / 0.27 |
📖 Documentation
Getting Started
Overview
Guides
Full documentation: aidimag.com
🤝 Contributing
Contributions welcome! See [CONTRIBUTING.md](./CONTRIBUTING.md) for dev setup, project principles, and the PR checklist. All participation is governed by our [Code of Conduct](./CODEOFCONDUCT.md).
💰 License & Pricing
AI Dimag is open source under the [MIT License](./LICENSE) — free for everyone, any team size, forever. Use it, fork it, embed it.
The entire local-first product is free: CLI, MCP server, verification, guardrails, skills, IDE extensions, local dashboard, and self-hosted team sync (dim serve).
Want team sync without running a server? AI Dimag Cloud is an optional managed sync subscription — that's how the project stays funded and open source. See Pricing.
Built by Anup Khanal
Website • Documentation • Cloud • npm • [License](./LICENSE)
Source & license
This open-source MCP server is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: AiDimag
- Source: AiDimag/aidimag
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://aidimag.com
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.