AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
MCP unreviewed MIT Self-run

Treelang

mcp-cs0lar-treelang · by cs0lar

LLM function calling on steroids using Abstract Syntax Trees.

No reviews yet
0 installs
0 views
view→install

Install

$ agentstack add mcp-cs0lar-treelang

Open-source listing, not yet scanned by AgentStack. Follow the source repository for install instructions.

Security review

⚠ Flagged

1 finding(s); flagged for manual review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures
  • high Dangerous shell/eval execution.

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution Used

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Reliability & compatibility

Not yet reviewed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
15d ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude DesktopCursorWindsurf

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Treelang? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

🌲 treelang

[](https://pepy.tech/projects/treelang) [](https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT)

Treelang is a small, typed orchestration language for the gap between simple tool calling and a full workflow engine.

Most tool-using agents alternate between a model call and a tool call, sending each result back to the model so it can choose the next step. Treelang takes a different path: the model generates a complete, validated program first, then your application executes that program locally against its tools. Intermediate tool results stay in your process and do not return to the model.

That trade is especially useful when the workflow shape can be planned before the data arrives: bulk operations, private-data processing, repeatable automations, and tool compositions that need branching, mapping, filtering, reduction, concurrency, or bounded recursion. The generated AST is a real artifact—you can inspect it, reject it, apply resource limits, cache it, replay it, or expose it as another tool.

Highlights

  • Plan once, execute locally — generate the complete tool program before

execution instead of paying for a model round-trip after every tool result.

  • Keep the data plane out of the prompt — customer records, financial

values, internal search results, and other intermediate outputs flow between local nodes and tools without being sent back to the model.

  • Use real control flow — validated ASTs support nested tool calls,

conditionals, map, filter, reduce, parallel branches, and opt-in recursive functions.

  • Review the program before it runs — serialize, diff, sign, cache, approve,

replay, or reject a plan independently from model generation.

  • Put hard limits around generated code — enforce node, depth, call, tool,

concurrency, and wall-clock budgets; validate complete tool input schemas before invocation.

  • Bring your own models and tools — OpenAI and Anthropic share the same

orchestration contract; MCP and custom ToolProvider implementations share the same execution runtime.

  • Test without a model bill — deterministic transports, tool fakes, replay

fixtures, provider contract suites, and an offline benchmark ship with the project.

What you can build

  • Private bulk operations — fetch IDs, fan out over records, apply

deterministic eligibility tools, and aggregate results without placing the underlying records in model context.

  • Finance and operations workflows — compose invoice, pricing, inventory, or

reconciliation tools into reviewable plans with explicit branches and execution budgets.

  • Reusable generated automations — create a workflow for a user's intent,

approve it once, then persist and rerun the same AST as inputs change.

  • MCP tool composition — turn several narrow MCP tools into one higher-level

callable tool without implementing a new orchestration service for every composition.

  • Controlled recursive jobs — use opt-in schema v2 for bounded retries,

hierarchical traversal, divide-and-conquer operations, or recursive business rules with a separate call-depth limit.

  • Auditable AI features — store the proposed program separately from its

execution evidence, then reproduce model and tool behavior with deterministic replay.

Treelang is not intended for open-ended agents that must repeatedly inspect unstructured tool output and improvise their next action. It fits best when tools expose the operations and predicates needed to express the decision logic, and when local execution, privacy, repeatability, or auditability matter more than continuous model deliberation.

Quick start

Requirements

  • Python 3.12+
  • An OpenAI API key for the example below, or install treelang[anthropic] and

use the Anthropic transport

  • A source of tools for production: an MCP server or a custom ToolProvider

Install

pip install treelang

Treelang also installs a command-line interface:

treelang validate program.json
treelang inspect program.json
treelang execute program.json --max-nodes 1000 --timeout 10

See the [CLI guide](docs/cli.md) for replay fixtures, provider-backed generation, and stable exit statuses.

Provider and application authors can import deterministic fakes and reusable, framework-neutral contract suites from treelang.testing; see the [testing-kit guide](docs/testing.md).

Canonical v1 and v2 JSON Schema files ship in the package and documentation site. See the [editor-validation guide](docs/json-schema.md), or run treelang schema --schema-version 2.0.

Generate, inspect, then execute

This runnable example models a realistic data-minimization boundary: the model can see the invoice tool definitions, but invoice IDs and balances appear only during local execution. FakeToolProvider keeps the quick start self-contained; replace it with MCPToolProvider or your own provider in an application.

import asyncio

from treelang import AST, ExecutionLimits
from treelang.ai.arborist import OpenAIArborist
from treelang.ai.responses import EvalType
from treelang.testing import FakeToolProvider

async def main() -> None:
    balances = {1001: 850.0, 1002: 1_900.0, 1003: 400.0}
    provider = FakeToolProvider(
        tools=[
            {
                "name": "list_open_invoice_ids",
                "description": "Return the IDs of all currently open invoices.",
                "properties": {},
            },
            {
                "name": "get_invoice_balance",
                "description": "Return the outstanding balance for one invoice ID.",
                "properties": {"invoice_id": {"type": "integer"}},
            },
            {
                "name": "sum_values",
                "description": "Return the sum of a list of numbers.",
                "properties": {
                    "values": {"type": "array", "items": {"type": "number"}}
                },
            },
        ],
        results={
            "list_open_invoice_ids": list(balances),
            "get_invoice_balance": lambda args: balances[args["invoice_id"]],
            "sum_values": lambda args: sum(args["values"]),
        },
    )

    arborist = OpenAIArborist(
        model="gpt-4o-2024-11-20",
        provider=provider,
    )
    response = await arborist.eval(
        "Get every open invoice balance, then return their total.",
        EvalType.TREE,
    )

    # The model call is finished. Review or persist the program before it runs.
    tree = response.content
    print(AST.repr(tree))

    # Invoice IDs and balances now move only between local tools and AST nodes.
    total = await AST.eval(
        tree,
        provider,
        limits=ExecutionLimits(
            max_nodes=100,
            max_tool_calls=20,
            max_concurrency=5,
            timeout_seconds=10,
        ),
    )
    print(total)  # 3150.0

asyncio.run(main())

The exact generated tree can vary by model, but it must validate before Treelang returns it. Asking for EvalType.TREE creates an explicit approval boundary; use EvalType.WALK when immediate execution is appropriate. The [credential-free quickstart notebook](cookbook/quickstart.ipynb) demonstrates the same validate/inspect/execute lifecycle with no model call.

Bound execution resources

Evaluation remains unlimited by default for compatibility. Applications that execute generated or untrusted trees can apply one shared budget per invocation:

from treelang import AST, ExecutionLimits

result = await AST.eval(
    tree,
    provider,
    limits=ExecutionLimits(
        max_nodes=1_000,
        max_depth=50,
        max_tool_calls=100,
        max_concurrency=10,
        timeout_seconds=30,
    ),
)

Exceeding any configured maximum raises ExecutionLimitError. External task cancellation still propagates normally. Pass the same limits argument to AST.tool() to apply a fresh budget to every invocation of a compiled tool. Pass execution_limits=... to OpenAIArborist to enforce the policy whenever EvalType.WALK executes a generated tree; EvalType.TREE only returns the tree for inspection.

Experimental schema v2 recursion and opt-in model generation additionally support max_call_depth; see the [recursive-program guide](docs/recursive-programs.md).

Arborist automatically uses provider-native strict JSON Schema output when the transport declares support, while retaining validated JSON-mode fallback. Use ArboristConfig(structured_output_mode="required") to prohibit fallback or "compatibility" to force the legacy path. See the [structured-output guide](docs/structured-output.md).

Evaluated tool arguments are validated against each provider's complete JSON Schema before invocation. MCP schemas retain required fields, nested constraints, formats, and additional-property rules; see the [tool-input validation guide](docs/tool-input-validation.md).

Tree-first workflow

  1. GenerateOpenAIArborist assembles an AST using your available tools.
  2. Inspect – represent the tree as JSON, describe it with EvalResponse.describe(), or pretty-print it using AST.repr().
  3. EvaluateAST.eval(tree, provider) asynchronously executes every node; the LLM never sees intermediate values.
  4. Packageawait AST.tool(tree, provider) turns a tree into a callable tool so you can add it back to your MCP server.

Architecture at a glance

  • Arborist (treelang/ai/arborist.py) – orchestrates LLM calls, maintains history via the optional Memory interface, and decides whether to return ASTs or walked results.
  • Tool providers (treelang/ai/provider.py) – abstract how tools are discovered/invoked. We ship an MCP client implementation and a template for custom providers.
  • Selectors (treelang/ai/selector.py) – plug in your own tool filtering logic; AllToolsSelector ships by default.
  • Trees (treelang/trees/tree.py) – validated node models plus helpers for

async traversal, execution, representation, and compilation into callable tools.

Resources & examples

  • Documentation (published site) contains the [supported API reference](docs/api.md),

[architecture decisions](docs/README.md), and the [1.0 migration guide](docs/migration-1.0.md).

  • Cookbook notebooks (cookbook/) provide a

[tested end-to-end learning path](docs/cookbooks.md), from credential-free execution and custom providers to live model/MCP workflows.

  • Reproducible benchmark (evaluation/eval.py) runs versioned deterministic

cases without credentials, records machine-readable quality and resource metrics, and checks them against committed regression baselines. A separate owner-only manual live workflow records comparable OpenAI and Anthropic model quality, latency, token, and cost evidence without exposing credentials to pull requests. See [evaluation/README.md](evaluation/README.md) for commands and baseline policy.

  • Unit tests (tests/) cover the AST core and are a good reference for expected behavior when extending nodes.

Install the locked development environment and launch the cookbook notebooks from the repository root:

uv sync --frozen --all-groups
uv run jupyter notebook cookbook/

The calculator and game-stat notebooks call the configured OpenAI model and therefore require OPENAI_API_KEY. Normal CI does not make live model calls: it executes the credential-free quickstart and custom-provider tutorials, validates that every notebook is clean and compilable, then starts the cookbook MCP servers and exercises their deterministic tools. Run the same checks locally with make cookbooks and uv run pytest tests/test_cookbooks.py. See the [extension guide](docs/extensions.md) when contributing providers or other integrations.

Contributing & local development

We actively welcome contributions—see [CONTRIBUTING.md](CONTRIBUTING.md) for the full workflow.

Maintainers publish signed, provenance-attested releases through PyPI Trusted Publishing. See [RELEASING.md](RELEASING.md) for versioning, promotion, publishing, and verification instructions.

Source & license

This open-source MCP server is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.