AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
MCP verified Apache-2.0 Self-run

Memorystress

mcp-omega-memory-memorystress · by omega-memory

The first longitudinal benchmark for AI memory systems. Test LLM agents, RAG pipelines, MCP servers, and memory backends across 1,000 sessions.

No reviews yet
0 installs
28 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add mcp-omega-memory-memorystress

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/mcp-omega-memory-memorystress)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
5mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude DesktopCursorWindsurf

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Memorystress? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

MemoryStress

The first longitudinal benchmark for AI memory systems.

Test any memory system — OMEGA, Mem0, Zep, LangMem, or your own — against 1,000 sessions of realistic agent conversations. Works with OpenAI, Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini, or any LLM backend.

Every existing memory benchmark tests recall from a handful of sessions. MemoryStress tests what happens at session 1,000 — when facts contradict, memories fade, and noise accumulates over 10 simulated months.

583 facts  ×  1,000 sessions  ×  300 questions  ×  6 scoring dimensions

Why MemoryStress?

Current benchmarks don't test what breaks in production:

| Benchmark | Sessions | Contradictions | Degradation Curve | Multi-Agent | |-----------|:--------:|:--------------:|:-----------------:|:-----------:| | LongMemEval | ~40 | No | No | No | | MemoryAgentBench | Short | No | No | No | | BEAM | Synthetic | No | No | No | | MemoryStress | 1,000 | Yes (40 chains) | Yes (4 checkpoints) | Yes |

Real agents — Claude Code, ChatGPT with memory, custom OpenAI Assistants, LangChain agents — run for months. Their memory systems face:

  • Accumulation pressure: 1,000 sessions of growing noise
  • Contradiction resolution: Facts that change, revert, and partially update
  • Degradation over time: Can you still find a fact from session 12 after ingesting session 997?
  • Cross-agent recall: Information shared across agent identities
  • Cold start recovery: Fresh agent instance accessing an existing memory store

MemoryStress measures all of these.

Use Cases

  • Evaluate production memory systems before deploying long-running AI agents
  • Compare RAG approaches: vector databases, graph memory, hybrid retrieval systems
  • Benchmark MCP memory servers for Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Cline, Windsurf
  • Test OpenAI Assistants API thread persistence and memory retention
  • Validate custom memory architectures against a standardized dataset
  • Research memory degradation in conversational AI systems over time

Leaderboard

| System | Model | Score | Contradiction | Degradation Slope | Cost/Correct | Details | |--------|-------|:-----:|:-------------:|:-----------------:|:------------:|---------| | OMEGA v1.0 | GPT-4o | 32.7% (98/300) | 21.4% | -0.033 | $0.041 | [results](results/omega_v5/) | | Raw Context | GPT-4o | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD | — | | Mem0 | GPT-4o | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD | — | | Zep | — | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD | — | | LangMem | — | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD | — | | ChatGPT Memory | — | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD | — | | Null (baseline) | — | 0% | 0% | 0.000 | — | [results](results/null/) |

> 32.7% is a strong result on an intentionally brutal benchmark. The null baseline scores 0%. A context-window approach hits its token ceiling around session 200. This benchmark asks about single-mention facts buried in noisy conversations from hundreds of sessions ago.

Submit your results: Run the benchmark, open a PR with your results/ directory.

Quick Start

# Install
pip install memorystress

# Download dataset
# Option A: From HuggingFace
pip install huggingface_hub
huggingface-cli download singularityjason/memorystress --local-dir data/

# Option B: Generate your own (~$5 in API costs)
python scripts/generate.py --model gpt-4o --seed 42 --output data/memorystress_v1.json

# Run the null baseline (free, instant)
python scripts/run.py --dataset data/memorystress_v1.json --adapter null --grade

# Run with OMEGA (requires: pip install omega-memory)
python scripts/run.py --dataset data/memorystress_v1.json --adapter omega --grade \
  --extract-facts --query-augment --output-dir results/omega_v5

# Run with Mem0 (requires: pip install mem0ai)
python scripts/run.py --dataset data/memorystress_v1.json --adapter mem0 --grade \
  --output-dir results/mem0

How It Works

1. Dataset Generation

A GPT-4o pipeline generates:

  • 583 facts across 6 categories (preferences, decisions, technical facts, personal info, events, relationships)
  • 1,000 conversation sessions across 3 phases of increasing noise
  • 40 contradiction chains where facts update, revert, accumulate, or partially change
  • 300 questions at 4 phase checkpoints, spanning 7 question types

2. Three Phases of Pressure

Phase 1 (Sessions 1-100)     Low noise, establishing baseline
Phase 2 (Sessions 101-500)   Growing noise, contradictions emerge
Phase 3 (Sessions 501-1000)  Dense, high-entropy, multi-topic stress
Phase 4 (Recovery)           No new sessions — can you still recall?

3. Six Scoring Dimensions

| Dimension | What It Measures | |-----------|-----------------| | Recall@Age | Accuracy by fact age (0-100, 100-500, 500-1000 sessions) | | Degradation Curve | Accuracy at each phase checkpoint (slope = degradation rate) | | Contradiction Resolution | Can the system identify the most recent value? | | Cost Efficiency | Dollars per correct answer at each phase | | Cross-Agent Recall | Information recall across agent identities | | Cold Start Recovery | Fresh agent accessing an existing memory store |

4. Seven Question Types

  • Fact recall, Preference recall, Contradiction resolution, Temporal ordering, Cross-agent recall, Cold start recall, Single-mention recall

Add Your Memory System

Built an MCP memory server? Using OpenAI's Assistants API with threads? Running Mem0, Zep, LangMem, or a custom RAG pipeline? Test it here.

Implement 4 methods:

from memorystress.adapters.base import MemorySystemAdapter, IngestResult, QueryResult, CostSnapshot

class MyAdapter(MemorySystemAdapter):
    def ingest(self, session: dict) -> IngestResult:
        """Store a conversation session."""
        # session has: session_id, turns, simulated_date, agent_id, phase
        ...

    def query(self, question: dict) -> QueryResult:
        """Answer a question from memory."""
        # question has: question, agent_scope, question_type
        ...

    def reset(self) -> None:
        """Clear all stored data."""
        ...

    def get_cost(self) -> CostSnapshot:
        """Return cumulative token/cost accounting."""
        ...

Then add it to scripts/run.py's create_adapter() factory and run the benchmark.

OMEGA's Results: Deep Dive

Degradation Curve

Phase 1 (100 sessions):   31.4%  ██████
Phase 2 (500 sessions):   42.4%  ████████    ← peak: more data helps retrieval
Phase 3 (1000 sessions):  27.3%  █████       ← noise dilution, not data loss
Phase 4 (recovery):       25.5%  █████

Per-Type Breakdown

| Question Type | Score | N | |---------------|:-----:|:-:| | Temporal ordering | 41.2% | 34 | | Fact recall | 37.5% | 80 | | Cold start recall | 37.5% | 16 | | Preference recall | 37.1% | 35 | | Cross-agent recall | 31.2% | 32 | | Single-mention recall | 27.7% | 47 | | Contradiction resolution | 21.4% | 56 |

Recall by Fact Age

| Age | Score | |-----|:-----:| | 0-100 sessions | 33.8% | | 100-500 sessions | 39.7% | | 500-1000 sessions | 21.3% |

Mid-range facts (100-500 sessions old) are easiest — enough time to be reinforced, not so old that noise drowns them.

Comparison with Other Benchmarks

| Feature | MemoryStress | LongMemEval | MemoryAgentBench | BEAM | |---------|:------------:|:-----------:|:----------------:|:----:| | Session count | 1,000 | ~40 | Short | Synthetic | | Degradation measurement | Yes | No | No | No | | Contradiction chains | 40 | No | No | No | | Multi-agent | Yes | No | No | No | | Cold start testing | Yes | No | No | No | | Cost tracking | Yes | No | No | No | | Temporal questions | Yes | Yes | No | No | | Question types | 7 | 4 | Task-based | 3 |

Dataset

The full dataset is available on HuggingFace: singularityjason/memorystress

See [data/README.md](data/README.md) for format details and generation instructions.

Citation

@software{memorystress2026,
  title={MemoryStress: The First Longitudinal Benchmark for AI Memory Systems},
  author={OMEGA Memory},
  url={https://github.com/omega-memory/memorystress},
  year={2026}
}

License

Apache-2.0. See [LICENSE](LICENSE).

Source & license

This open-source MCP server is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.