Code Quality

Code Quality

Code quality is not aesthetics. It is one measurable thing: how fast can the next person (human or AI) change this code without breaking it? Every rule below serves that.

The hierarchy — when rules conflict, higher wins

1. Correct — handles the real input space, including the ugly parts (empty, null, duplicate, concurrent, huge, malformed).
2. Honest — the code's names, types, and structure tell the truth about what it does. No function named validate that also saves.
3. Changeable — the next likely change touches one place.
4. Consistent — matches the codebase around it. A "better" pattern that fights the codebase is worse.
5. Small/clever/fast — last, and only with evidence it matters.

Writing rules

Shape

• Functions do one thing at one level of abstraction. The test: can you name it accurately without "and"? Length is a symptom, not the rule — a 40-line straight-line function beats 5 fragmented ones you must chase.
• Depth over surface: prefer few functions with real behavior over layers of one-line delegation. Every hop a reader must follow is a cost; charge it against real value.
• Data shapes beat control flow: replacing an if/else ladder with a lookup table, an enum with exhaustive matching, or a well-typed state object usually deletes bugs. Make illegal states unrepresentable where the type system allows.

Names

• Names carry the spec: retry_delay_seconds not delay; is_eligible_for_credit not check. If a good name is impossible, the abstraction is wrong.
• Booleans read as assertions (is_, has_, can_); functions as verbs; avoid negated booleans (not_disabled) that force double negation.

Errors — where most "quality" issues actually live

• Handle or propagate, never swallow. An empty catch block is a bug with extra steps; catching broad Exception to log-and-continue hides corruption.
• Fail fast at boundaries: validate inputs where they enter (API edge, file load, config boot), then the interior trusts its inputs. Validation sprinkled everywhere means it's guaranteed nowhere.
• Error messages state what failed, with what input, and what the caller can do — written for the debugging session at 2 a.m.
• Distinguish expected failures (user error → typed error/result, clean message) from bugs (invariant broken → crash loudly). Converting bugs into handled errors hides them.

State & dependencies

• Minimize mutable state; minimize its scope; make mutation obvious. Global mutable state is guilty until proven innocent.
• Side effects live at the edges; the core computes. A function that computes AND writes AND notifies is three functions wearing a trenchcoat.
• Take dependencies explicitly (parameters/constructor), not by reaching into globals — this is what makes code testable without patching.

Comments

• Comment why, never what: constraints, non-obvious reasons, links to the decision. If the code needs a what-comment, rewrite the code.
• Delete commented-out code on sight; git remembers.

Duplication — the nuanced rule

Duplication is cheaper than the wrong abstraction. Extract when the copies must change together for the same reason (shared business rule); keep copies when they merely look alike today (two forms with similar fields). Rule of three: tolerate two, refactor at three — and when you extract, extract the concept, not the coincidence.

Refactoring discipline

• Never mix refactoring and behavior change in one commit; reviewers can verify "no behavior change" or "this specific change", not both at once.
• Refactor with a safety net (tests or at least a manual golden-path check), in steps that each keep the build green.
• Leave the campsite cleaner, but stay in the campsite: fixing everything you touch turns a 10-line PR into a 500-line hostage situation.

Reviewing code (yours or others')

1. First pass — intent: does this change do what was asked, and only that? Flag scope creep and silent behavior changes.
2. Second pass — the input space: walk empty/null/zero/negative/duplicate/huge/concurrent/unauthorized through every new path.
3. Third pass — the seams: every external call (time, network, disk, DB) — what happens when it's slow, fails, or returns garbage?
4. Report defects as: input → wrong behavior → consequence. Rank by severity. Style nits go last, batched, and never block correctness discussion.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

• Author: 05-deepak-patidar
• Source: 05-deepak-patidar/claude-skills
• License: MIT

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.