Install
$ agentstack add skill-0xdarkmatter-claude-mods-okf-ops ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
OKF Ops
The Open Knowledge Format (OKF) is a minimal, open convention for representing knowledge as a directory tree of markdown files with YAML frontmatter — the metadata and curated context that surrounds data and systems. This skill helps you assess whether a repo is a good fit, validate a bundle for conformance, and adopt OKF where it earns its keep.
Full format rules: [references/okf-spec.md](references/okf-spec.md). Copy-ready concept doc: [assets/concept-template.md](assets/concept-template.md).
Honest scope (read this before adopting)
OKF is a v0.1 draft (Google-published, platform-agnostic). It's deliberately minimal: one required frontmatter field (type), reserved index.md/log.md, and a permissive-consumption contract. Two consequences worth knowing up front:
- Adoption cost is shaped by the repo, not the size. A repo that already uses
frontmatter consistently is often one mechanical type-derivation pass from conformant. A repo of bare prose markdown needs frontmatter authored on every file — often not worth it, and arguably the wrong files to make "concepts."
- Conformance is a weak guarantee. "OKF-conformant" means the structural floor is
met, not that the content is good. Use the assessment to decide adoption per-repo; don't make it a blanket mandate.
The tools here are useful regardless of OKF's trajectory — assess-okf.py is a general "how frontmatter-consistent is this doc tree?" scanner.
Workflow: assess → decide → validate
1. Assess (read-only) — is this repo a good candidate?
python scripts/assess-okf.py docs/ # human summary
python scripts/assess-okf.py --json docs/ | jq '.data.readiness_pct'
Reports total .md, how many already carry frontmatter, how many have a non-empty type, a histogram of existing frontmatter keys (shows what vocabulary you already have to derive type from), type-value distribution, reserved files present, files that would need a type, and an overall readiness %. Never writes.
Read the histogram, not just the %. A repo at "0% readiness" with rich consistent keys (e.g. every file has title/level/tags) is a cheap migration — you derive type from an existing key. A repo at "0%" with mostly empty frontmatter is expensive. To find candidates across many repos, run assess on each and compare.
2. Decide — adopt only where the squeeze is worth the juice
- Frontmatter-consistent repo → adopt: derive
type, fix any malformed files, done. - Mixed prose + frontmatter repo → usually skip, or adopt a subset (designate only
the real concept docs; OKF has no built-in prose exemption — that's a known rigidity).
3. Validate — does a bundle conform?
python scripts/check-okf.py ./bundle # exit 0 conformant, 10 if not
python scripts/check-okf.py --json ./bundle | jq '.data[] | select(.severity=="error")'
python scripts/check-okf.py --strict ./bundle # soft warnings also fail
Enforces only the hard rules (every non-reserved .md has parseable frontmatter with a non-empty type; reserved files get light sanity). Per OKF's permissive-consumption rule, broken links and missing optional fields are INFO, never failures (unless --strict). Wire check-okf.py --strict as a CI gate (exit 10 fails the build) once a repo has adopted OKF.
Tools
Both scripts follow the Skill Resource Protocol: stdout is data-only (--json emits a {"data":…,"meta":{"schema":…}} envelope), framing/progress to stderr, --help with examples, semantic exit codes. Stdlib-only; PyYAML used if present, else a built-in frontmatter parser (announced on stderr).
| Script | Role | Exit codes | |--------|------|-----------| | scripts/assess-okf.py | Read-only readiness scan of a doc tree | 0 scanned, 2 usage, 3 not-found | | scripts/check-okf.py | Conformance validator for a bundle | 0 conformant, 10 non-conformant, 4 unparseable frontmatter, 3 not-found, 2 usage |
See also
- [references/okf-spec.md](references/okf-spec.md) — the format: frontmatter fields,
reserved files, conformance rules, permissive-consumption, versioning.
- [assets/concept-template.md](assets/concept-template.md) — copy-ready OKF concept doc.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: 0xDarkMatter
- Source: 0xDarkMatter/claude-mods
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://github.com/0xDarkMatter/claude-mods#readme
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.