AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Defense In Depth

skill-a-ariff-ariff-claude-plugins-defense-in-depth · by a-ariff

Multi-layer validation to catch bugs before they escape

— No reviews yet
0 installs
40 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-a-ariff-ariff-claude-plugins-defense-in-depth

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
  • ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
  • ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • ✓ Untrusted network calls
  • ✓ Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • ✓ Network access No
  • ✓ Filesystem access No
  • ✓ Shell / process execution No
  • ✓ Environment & secrets No
  • ✓ Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-a-ariff-ariff-claude-plugins-defense-in-depth)

Reliability & compatibility

✓ Security review passed
0 installs to date
— no reviews yet
○ 6mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Defense In Depth? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Defense in Depth

Philosophy

MULTIPLE INDEPENDENT VALIDATION LAYERS
Each layer catches what others miss

One check can fail silently. Four layers rarely do.

The Four Layers

Layer 1: Type/Syntax

What: Static analysis, types, linting
Catches: Typos, syntax errors, type mismatches
Run: First, before anything else

Layer 2: Unit Tests

What: Individual function/module tests
Catches: Logic errors, edge cases, regressions
Run: After each code change

Layer 3: Integration Tests

What: Component interaction tests
Catches: Interface mismatches, data flow errors
Run: After unit tests pass

Layer 4: End-to-End

What: Full system tests, user scenarios
Catches: Missing requirements, workflow bugs
Run: Before claiming complete

The Pipeline

Code Change
    ↓
[Layer 1: Lint/Type Check]
    ↓ PASS?
[Layer 2: Unit Tests]
    ↓ PASS?
[Layer 3: Integration Tests]
    ↓ PASS?
[Layer 4: E2E / Manual Check]
    ↓ PASS?
Done

Fail at any layer → FIX before proceeding

Why Every Layer Matters

| Without This Layer | What Escapes | |-------------------|--------------| | No type checks | Undefined calls crash at runtime | | No unit tests | Logic bugs slip through | | No integration | Components don't work together | | No E2E | User workflows broken |

Implementation Patterns

For Code Changes

1. Make change
2. Run linter immediately
3. Run affected unit tests
4. Run integration suite
5. Test the actual feature

For Bug Fixes

1. Write failing test first
2. Fix the bug
3. Run all tests (regression check)
4. Verify original symptom gone

For New Features

1. Write unit tests for new logic
2. Implement feature
3. Add integration tests
4. Verify against requirements

Layer-Specific Commands

Configure per project:

layer_1:
  command: "npm run lint && npm run typecheck"
  when: "On save, before commit"
  
layer_2:
  command: "npm run test:unit"
  when: "After code changes"
  
layer_3:
  command: "npm run test:integration"
  when: "After unit tests pass"
  
layer_4:
  command: "npm run test:e2e"
  when: "Before claiming done"

Recovery Procedures

Layer 1 Fails

→ Syntax/type error in your code
→ Fix immediately, don't proceed
→ Never commit with lint errors

Layer 2 Fails

→ Logic error or regression
→ Check: Did you break something?
→ Check: Is your new test wrong?
→ Fix root cause, not symptoms

Layer 3 Fails

→ Interface/contract broken
→ Check: API changes?
→ Check: State management issues?
→ May need to update multiple files

Layer 4 Fails

→ User-visible problem
→ Trace back through layers
→ Ask: Which layer SHOULD have caught this?
→ Add test to that layer

Integration with Checker Agents

  • pre-action-verifier → Runs before each layer
  • assumption-checker → Validates test assumptions
  • scope-boundary-checker → Ensures tests cover scope
  • rollback-planner → Ready if pipeline fails

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.