Install
$ agentstack add skill-aaronontheweb-dotnet-skills-microsoft-extensions-dependency-injection ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Dependency Injection Patterns
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- Organizing service registrations in ASP.NET Core applications
- Avoiding massive Program.cs/Startup.cs files with hundreds of registrations
- Making service configuration reusable between production and tests
- Designing libraries that integrate with Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection
Reference Files
- [advanced-patterns.md](advanced-patterns.md): Testing with DI extensions, Akka.NET actor scope management, conditional/factory/keyed registration patterns
The Problem
Without organization, Program.cs becomes unmanageable:
// BAD: 200+ lines of unorganized registrations
var builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args);
builder.Services.AddScoped();
builder.Services.AddScoped();
builder.Services.AddScoped();
builder.Services.AddScoped();
// ... 150 more lines ...
Problems: hard to find related registrations, no clear boundaries, can't reuse in tests, merge conflicts.
The Solution: Extension Method Composition
Group related registrations into extension methods:
// GOOD: Clean, composable Program.cs
var builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args);
builder.Services
.AddUserServices()
.AddOrderServices()
.AddEmailServices()
.AddPaymentServices()
.AddValidators();
var app = builder.Build();
Extension Method Pattern
Basic Structure
namespace MyApp.Users;
public static class UserServiceCollectionExtensions
{
public static IServiceCollection AddUserServices(this IServiceCollection services)
{
services.AddScoped();
services.AddScoped();
services.AddScoped();
services.AddScoped();
services.AddScoped();
return services;
}
}
With Configuration
namespace MyApp.Email;
public static class EmailServiceCollectionExtensions
{
public static IServiceCollection AddEmailServices(
this IServiceCollection services,
string configSectionName = "EmailSettings")
{
services.AddOptions()
.BindConfiguration(configSectionName)
.ValidateDataAnnotations()
.ValidateOnStart();
services.AddSingleton();
services.AddSingleton();
services.AddScoped();
services.AddScoped();
return services;
}
}
File Organization
Place extension methods near the services they register:
src/
MyApp.Api/
Program.cs # Composes all Add* methods
MyApp.Users/
Services/
UserService.cs
UserServiceCollectionExtensions.cs # AddUserServices()
MyApp.Orders/
OrderServiceCollectionExtensions.cs # AddOrderServices()
MyApp.Email/
EmailServiceCollectionExtensions.cs # AddEmailServices()
Convention: {Feature}ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs next to the feature's services.
Naming Conventions
| Pattern | Use For | |---------|---------| | Add{Feature}Services() | General feature registration | | Add{Feature}() | Short form when unambiguous | | Configure{Feature}() | When primarily setting options | | Use{Feature}() | Middleware (on IApplicationBuilder) |
Testing Benefits
The Add* pattern lets you reuse production configuration in tests and only override what's different. Works with WebApplicationFactory, Akka.Hosting.TestKit, and standalone ServiceCollection.
See [advanced-patterns.md](advanced-patterns.md) for complete testing examples.
Layered Extensions
For larger applications, compose extensions hierarchically:
public static class AppServiceCollectionExtensions
{
public static IServiceCollection AddAppServices(this IServiceCollection services)
{
return services
.AddDomainServices()
.AddInfrastructureServices()
.AddApiServices();
}
}
public static class DomainServiceCollectionExtensions
{
public static IServiceCollection AddDomainServices(this IServiceCollection services)
{
return services
.AddUserServices()
.AddOrderServices()
.AddProductServices();
}
}
Akka.Hosting Integration
The same pattern works for Akka.NET actor configuration:
public static class OrderActorExtensions
{
public static AkkaConfigurationBuilder AddOrderActors(
this AkkaConfigurationBuilder builder)
{
return builder
.WithActors((system, registry, resolver) =>
{
var orderProps = resolver.Props();
var orderRef = system.ActorOf(orderProps, "orders");
registry.Register(orderRef);
});
}
}
// Usage in Program.cs
builder.Services.AddAkka("MySystem", (builder, sp) =>
{
builder
.AddOrderActors()
.AddInventoryActors()
.AddNotificationActors();
});
See akka-hosting-actor-patterns skill for complete Akka.Hosting patterns.
Anti-Patterns
Don't: Register Everything in Program.cs
// BAD: Massive Program.cs with 200+ lines of registrations
Don't: Create Overly Generic Extensions
// BAD: Too vague, doesn't communicate what's registered
public static IServiceCollection AddServices(this IServiceCollection services) { ... }
Don't: Hide Important Configuration
// BAD: Buried settings
public static IServiceCollection AddDatabase(this IServiceCollection services)
{
services.AddDbContext(options =>
options.UseSqlServer("hardcoded-connection-string")); // Hidden!
}
// GOOD: Accept configuration explicitly
public static IServiceCollection AddDatabase(
this IServiceCollection services,
string connectionString)
{
services.AddDbContext(options =>
options.UseSqlServer(connectionString));
}
Best Practices Summary
| Practice | Benefit | |----------|---------| | Group related services into Add* methods | Clean Program.cs, clear boundaries | | Place extensions near the services they register | Easy to find and maintain | | Return IServiceCollection for chaining | Fluent API | | Accept configuration parameters | Flexibility | | Use consistent naming (Add{Feature}Services) | Discoverability | | Test by reusing production extensions | Confidence, less duplication |
Lifetime Management
| Lifetime | Use When | Examples | |----------|----------|----------| | Singleton | Stateless, thread-safe, expensive to create | Configuration, HttpClient factories, caches | | Scoped | Stateful per-request, database contexts | DbContext, repositories, user context | | Transient | Lightweight, stateful, cheap to create | Validators, short-lived helpers |
// SINGLETON: Stateless services, shared safely
services.AddSingleton();
// SCOPED: Database access, per-request state
services.AddScoped();
// TRANSIENT: Cheap, short-lived
services.AddTransient();
Scoped services require a scope. ASP.NET Core creates one per HTTP request. In background services and actors, create scopes manually.
See [advanced-patterns.md](advanced-patterns.md) for actor scope management patterns.
Common Mistakes
Injecting Scoped into Singleton
// BAD: Singleton captures scoped service - stale DbContext!
public class CacheService // Registered as Singleton
{
private readonly IUserRepository _repo; // Scoped - captured at startup!
}
// GOOD: Inject IServiceProvider, create scope per operation
public class CacheService
{
private readonly IServiceProvider _serviceProvider;
public async Task GetUserAsync(string id)
{
using var scope = _serviceProvider.CreateScope();
var repo = scope.ServiceProvider.GetRequiredService();
return await repo.GetByIdAsync(id);
}
}
No Scope in Background Work
// BAD: No scope for scoped services
public class BadBackgroundService : BackgroundService
{
private readonly IOrderService _orderService; // Scoped - will throw!
}
// GOOD: Create scope for each unit of work
public class GoodBackgroundService : BackgroundService
{
private readonly IServiceScopeFactory _scopeFactory;
protected override async Task ExecuteAsync(CancellationToken ct)
{
using var scope = _scopeFactory.CreateScope();
var orderService = scope.ServiceProvider.GetRequiredService();
// ...
}
}
Resources
- Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/extensions/dependency-injection
- Akka.Hosting: https://github.com/akkadotnet/Akka.Hosting
- Akka.DependencyInjection: https://getakka.net/articles/actors/dependency-injection.html
- Options Pattern: See
microsoft-extensions-configurationskill
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: Aaronontheweb
- Source: Aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.