AgentStack
SKILL verified Apache-2.0 Self-run

Cqa Report

skill-abhatt-rh-redhat-docs-agent-tools-cqa-report · by abhatt-rh

Use when all CQA parameters have been assessed and you need to generate the final CQA 2.1 assessment report with scores, evidence, and summary tables.

No reviews yet
0 installs
0 views
view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-abhatt-rh-redhat-docs-agent-tools-cqa-report

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Cqa Report? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

CQA Report Generation

Overview

Generate the final CQA 2.1 Content Quality Assessment report after all parameters have been assessed and scored.

Report Structure

Header

# CQA 2.1 Content Quality Assessment Report -- [Product Name]

**Content location**: `/` (assemblies/, topics/, snippets/)
**Date of review**: YYYY-MM-DD
**Files analyzed**: N (X assemblies + Y topics) + Z snippets
**Tools used**: Vale asciidoctor-dita-vale, docs repo's validate-refs.py, cqa-audit.py

Per-tab tables

For each tab (Pre-migration, Quality, Onboarding), create a table:

| # | Requirement | Level | Score | Evidence |
|---|-------------|-------|-------|----------|
| 1 | Parameter description | Required/Important | **4/3/2/1** | Specific evidence |

Tab summaries

| Category | Items | Avg Score |
|----------|-------|-----------|
| Required | N | X.X |
| Important | N | X.X |
| **Overall** | **N** | **X.X** |

Overall summary

| Tab | Items Scored | Average Score | Rating |
|-----|-------------|---------------|--------|
| Pre-migration | 19 | X.X | Rating |
| Quality | 25 | X.X | Rating |
| Onboarding | 10 | X.X | Rating |
| **Overall** | **54** | **X.X** | **Rating** |

Rating thresholds

Individual parameters are scored as integers (4, 3, 2, or 1). The average score across all parameters in a tab determines the tab's overall rating:

  • 3.5+ = "Meets criteria"
  • 3.0-3.4 = "Mostly meets"
  • 2.5-2.9 = "Mostly does not meet"
  • Below 2.5 = "Does not meet"

The overall assessment rating uses the same thresholds applied to the average across all 54 parameters.

Issues list

Prioritized list of remaining issues:

  1. High Priority (blockers)
  2. Medium Priority (quality improvements)
  3. Low Priority (cleanup)

Files changed

Consolidated list of all files modified during the assessment.

Output

Write the report to CQA-2.1-Assessment-Report.md in the workspace root.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.