skill-adeerkhan-vitruvius-audit · by Install
$ agentstack add skill-adeerkhan-vitruvius-audit ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Links to your public security report.[](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-adeerkhan-vitruvius-audit) Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Engineering Audit
Audit a claimed/specified behavior against its actual implementation or source. This reuses the engineering-research discipline, focused on consistency between two things.
Workflow
- Outline the audit — what is being compared (paper vs code, spec vs
design, standard vs as-built, datasheet vs application), which claims to check, and the governing references. Write the plan to outputs/.plans/.md; briefly summarize and continue.
- Read both sides directly — the claim AND the implementation/source.
For code: read the actual code, not the README. For a standard: read the actual provision. Record versions/editions/commits.
- Compare claim-by-claim — for each checked item record:
- the claim (with its source location)
- the actual behavior (with its location)
- match / mismatch / missing / ambiguous
- Call out — missing code or provisions, mismatched defaults, ambiguous
parameters, claims that outrun the evidence, and reproduction risks.
- Save one audit report to
outputs/-audit.md, ending with a
Sources section (paper + repo URL, spec + section, standard + edition).
Never conclude "consistent" from a skim. Every claim in the audit's verdict must name the exact provision, line, or commit it was checked against.
Scope and Boundaries
- This skill produces research — it does NOT produce final designs or construction documents.
- Research-only, not for final engineering sign-off. Licensed engineers must review and approve any design based on this research.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: adeerkhan
- Source: adeerkhan/vitruvius
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.