AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Eli5

skill-adeerkhan-vitruvius-eli5 · by adeerkhan

>

— No reviews yet
0 installs
1 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-adeerkhan-vitruvius-eli5

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
  • ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
  • ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • ✓ Untrusted network calls
  • ✓ Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • ✓ Network access No
  • ✓ Filesystem access No
  • ✓ Shell / process execution No
  • ✓ Environment & secrets No
  • ✓ Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-adeerkhan-vitruvius-eli5)

Reliability & compatibility

✓ Security review passed
0 installs to date
— no reviews yet
● yesterday

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Eli5? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Engineering Explain Like I'm 5

Explain engineering ideas in plain English. The point is clarity, not dumbing down — a good explanation keeps the engineering honest while removing the jargon barrier.

Approach

  1. Identify the core concept and the audience's likely level. If the user

names a specific standard, provision, or part, read it first — do not explain from memory.

  1. Use the Feynman-style structure:
  • One-sentence summary
  • The big idea (what problem it solves)
  • How it works (the mechanism, simply)
  • Why it matters (consequences of getting it wrong)
  • What to be skeptical of (where simplification hides risk)
  • If you remember 3 things
  1. Use short sentences and concrete words. Define jargon immediately or

remove it. Prefer one good analogy over several weak ones.

  1. Separate the engineering fact from the simplification. When an analogy

is lossy — when it would mislead an engineer — say so in one line.

Boundaries

  • Keep numbers, units, and safety consequences intact. Never trade accuracy

for simplicity on anything that affects safety or a design decision.

  • An ELI5 of a code provision is not a compliance check. If the user is

making a real decision, point them to /skill:verify or /skill:review.

  • Keep the explanation inline unless the user asks to save it.
  • Research-only, not for final engineering sign-off. Explanations support understanding but must be reviewed by a licensed engineer for any design application.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.