Install
$ agentstack add skill-adeerkhan-vitruvius-eli5 ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Engineering Explain Like I'm 5
Explain engineering ideas in plain English. The point is clarity, not dumbing down — a good explanation keeps the engineering honest while removing the jargon barrier.
Approach
- Identify the core concept and the audience's likely level. If the user
names a specific standard, provision, or part, read it first — do not explain from memory.
- Use the Feynman-style structure:
- One-sentence summary
- The big idea (what problem it solves)
- How it works (the mechanism, simply)
- Why it matters (consequences of getting it wrong)
- What to be skeptical of (where simplification hides risk)
- If you remember 3 things
- Use short sentences and concrete words. Define jargon immediately or
remove it. Prefer one good analogy over several weak ones.
- Separate the engineering fact from the simplification. When an analogy
is lossy — when it would mislead an engineer — say so in one line.
Boundaries
- Keep numbers, units, and safety consequences intact. Never trade accuracy
for simplicity on anything that affects safety or a design decision.
- An ELI5 of a code provision is not a compliance check. If the user is
making a real decision, point them to /skill:verify or /skill:review.
- Keep the explanation inline unless the user asks to save it.
- Research-only, not for final engineering sign-off. Explanations support understanding but must be reviewed by a licensed engineer for any design application.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: adeerkhan
- Source: adeerkhan/vitruvius
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.