AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Mechanical

skill-adeerkhan-vitruvius-mechanical · by adeerkhan

>

— No reviews yet
0 installs
3 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-adeerkhan-vitruvius-mechanical

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
  • ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
  • ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • ✓ Untrusted network calls
  • ✓ Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • ✓ Network access No
  • ✓ Filesystem access No
  • ✓ Shell / process execution No
  • ✓ Environment & secrets No
  • ✓ Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-adeerkhan-vitruvius-mechanical)

Reliability & compatibility

✓ Security review passed
0 installs to date
— no reviews yet
● yesterday

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Mechanical? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Mechanical Engineering Research

Activate the /skill:engineering-research method and run it with this domain payload. Do not restate the research loop here.

Evidence landscape

  • Standards/codes: ASME (BPVC, B31 piping), ASTM, ISO, SAE, AWS, AGMA,

API. When a code governs the question, cite the exact section.

  • Handbooks: Machinery's Handbook, Marks', Shigley's, ASME/ASM

handbooks — use only when a direct primary read is possible.

  • Primary sources: manufacturer datasheets, bearing/coupling catalogs,

material property data from the issuing body, patent documents, peer- reviewed journals. For journal literature use the /skill:scholarly-research discovery layers (OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar, arXiv).

  • Prior art / practice: documented field failures, failure analyses,

trade association guidance (e.g. ASME B31, AGMA, NFPA).

Verification criteria

  • Units: every number carries a unit; state the unit system (SI, US

customary) and convert explicitly. Flag mixed-unit claims.

  • Sign conventions: tension/compression, torque direction, load sign.
  • Material properties: a property value must trace to a named grade +

specification (e.g. A36 per ASTM A36), not to a vague "steel".

  • Design basis: design factor / factor of safety must be stated and traced

to code or practice (e.g. ASME BPVC design factor), not assumed.

  • Code provisions: verify the standard exists, cite the section number,

and read the actual provision before summarizing it.

  • Calculations: any derived number must show the formula, inputs, and

units so it can be re-run.

Deliverable shape

Follow the method's artifact contract (outputs/.plans/.md → draft → cited → final + .provenance.md). In the final artifact, end with a Sources section citing standard + section, and mark every load, factor, and material property verified, inferred, or blocked.

Invocation Flags

Accept --deep and --quick flags and pass them through to the engineering-research method. See that skill for flag semantics.

Gap Detection

If research hits an evidence dead-end — no standard, paper, or dataset addresses the question after exhausting the discovery layers — suggest running /gap-analysis mechanical to formally validate and document the gap. Do not invoke gap-analysis automatically; offer it as a next step and wait for the user to confirm.

Scope and Boundaries

  • This skill produces research — it does NOT produce final designs or construction documents.
  • Research-only, not for final engineering sign-off. Licensed engineers must review and approve any design based on this research.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.