Install
$ agentstack add skill-aden-hive-hive-triage-issue ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Triage Issue Skill
Analyze a GitHub issue, verify claims against the codebase, and close invalid issues with a technical response.
Trigger
User provides a GitHub issue URL or number, e.g.:
/triage-issue 1970/triage-issue https://github.com/adenhq/hive/issues/1970
Workflow
Step 1: Fetch Issue Details
gh issue view --repo adenhq/hive --json title,body,state,labels,author
Extract:
- Title
- Body (the claim/bug report)
- Current state
- Labels
- Author
If issue is already closed, inform user and stop.
Step 2: Analyze the Claim
Read the issue body and identify:
- The core claim - What is the user asserting?
- Technical specifics - File paths, function names, code snippets mentioned
- Expected behavior - What do they think should happen?
- Severity claimed - Security issue? Bug? Feature request?
Step 3: Investigate the Codebase
For each technical claim:
- Find the referenced code using Grep/Glob/Read
- Understand the actual implementation
- Check if the claim accurately describes the behavior
- Look for related tests, documentation, or design decisions
Step 4: Evaluate Validity
Categorize the issue as one of:
| Category | Action | |----------|--------| | Valid Bug | Do NOT close. Inform user this is a real issue. | | Valid Feature Request | Do NOT close. Suggest labeling appropriately. | | Misunderstanding | Prepare technical explanation for why behavior is correct. | | Fundamentally Flawed | Prepare critique explaining the technical impossibility or design rationale. | | Duplicate | Find the original issue and prepare duplicate notice. | | Incomplete | Prepare request for more information. |
Step 5: Draft Response
For issues to be closed, draft a response that:
- Acknowledges the concern - Don't be dismissive
- Explains the actual behavior - With code references
- Provides technical rationale - Why it works this way
- References industry standards - If applicable
- Offers alternatives - If there's a better approach for the user
Use this template:
## Analysis
[Brief summary of what was investigated]
## Technical Details
[Explanation with code references]
## Why This Is Working As Designed
[Rationale]
## Recommendation
[What the user should do instead, if applicable]
---
*This issue was reviewed and closed by the maintainers.*
Step 6: User Review
Present the draft to the user with:
## Issue #:
**Claim:**
**Finding:**
**Draft Response:**
---
Do you want me to post this comment and close the issue?
Use AskUserQuestion with options:
- "Post and close" - Post comment, close issue
- "Edit response" - Let user modify the response
- "Skip" - Don't take action
Step 7: Execute Action
If user approves:
# Post comment
gh issue comment --repo adenhq/hive --body ""
# Close issue
gh issue close --repo adenhq/hive --reason "not planned"
Report success with link to the issue.
Important Guidelines
- Never close valid issues - If there's any merit to the claim, don't close it
- Be respectful - The reporter took time to file the issue
- Be technical - Provide code references and evidence
- Be educational - Help them understand, don't just dismiss
- Check twice - Make sure you understand the code before declaring something invalid
- Consider edge cases - Maybe their environment reveals a real issue
Example Critiques
Security Misunderstanding
> "The claim that secrets are exposed in plaintext misunderstands the encryption architecture. While SecretStr is used for logging protection, actual encryption is provided by Fernet (AES-128-CBC) at the storage layer. The code path is: serialize → encrypt → write. Only encrypted bytes touch disk."
Impossible Request
> "The requested feature would require [X] which violates [fundamental constraint]. This is not a limitation of our implementation but a fundamental property of [technology/protocol]."
Already Handled
> "This scenario is already handled by [code reference]. The reporter may be using an older version or misconfigured environment."
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: aden-hive
- Source: aden-hive/hive
- License: Apache-2.0
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.