Install
$ agentstack add skill-ai-driven-dev-framework-01-brainstorm ✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
About
Brainstorm
Turns a vague idea into a precise one through a deep, natural conversation. Each round asks pointed questions, follows the threads the answers open, and challenges assumptions, until the idea is clear enough to act on. It digs, it does not tick boxes.
Actions
| # | Action | Role | Input | | --- | ----------- | --------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------- | | 01 | capture | Restate the idea and read its altitude | the user's idea | | 02 | probe | Ask pointed questions, follow the open thread, challenge | the idea so far | | 03 | integrate | Fold answers in, judge if real ambiguity remains | answers + the idea | | 04 | finalize | Consolidate, flag open assumptions, offer to persist | the clarified idea |
Default flow
capture once, then loop probe → integrate until no real ambiguity remains or the user is satisfied, then finalize. There is no fixed round count, the idea is done when it is clear, not on a timer. Run each action's ## Test before the next.
Transversal rules
- Clarify the idea, never build it. Surface the leaning and its tradeoff when the facts point one way, but do not lock a solution, write a plan, or produce code.
- Stay tool-agnostic. Refine the idea on its own terms. Never write a
plugin:skillidentifier, name the capability in plain words instead (the project's rule-writing, its planning step), never the skill that provides it. How it gets built is the next step's job, not brainstorm's. - Work at the user's altitude, functional or technical, and probe at that grain, never one level finer.
- Follow the thread. Pull on what each answer opens, especially a fork where two materially different builds are still possible, rather than cycling fixed topics. Depth over breadth.
- Challenge assumptions and surface limit cases as they appear, do not save them for the end.
- Ask a focused set of pointed questions, several when they share the thread, never a question already answered, never a flat checklist. Keep it a conversation.
- Keep going until the idea is clear or the user stops. Never stop on a count.
- Flag every open assumption, never present a guess as settled.
- Wait for the user after every question and at approval.
References
references/probing.md: how to read altitude, follow threads, the probing tactics, and when to stop.
Assets
assets/question-angles.md: concrete question prompts to draw from when probing.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: ai-driven-dev
- Source: ai-driven-dev/framework
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://www.ai-driven-dev.fr/
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.