AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Git Review Pr Comments

skill-ainova-systems-intelligence-dev-packs-git-review-pr-comments · by ainova-systems

Triage PR review comments: fix, discuss, or decline with reason - every thread answered

No reviews yet
0 installs
31 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-ainova-systems-intelligence-dev-packs-git-review-pr-comments

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-ainova-systems-intelligence-dev-packs-git-review-pr-comments)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
3mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Git Review Pr Comments? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Handle PR Review Comments

Drain reviewer feedback: every thread ends with a fix commit or a reasoned reply. Silence is never a response.

Steps

  1. Resolve the PR for the current branch: gh pr list --head --state open --json number --jq '.[0].number'.
  2. Fetch open threads: GraphQL reviewThreads(first: 100) { nodes { id isResolved comments(first: 1) { nodes { path line body author { login } } } } } - keep isResolved == false (already-resolved threads were handled on a prior run; skipping them is what makes re-running safe); plus gh pr view --json reviews,comments for conversation-level notes.
  3. For each thread, read the cited file and line, then VERIFY the claim against the code before trusting it - automated reviewers (bots) often cite a rationale that is stale or does not match the project's conventions. Grep for the actual precedent (sibling code, the relevant rule) instead of mirroring the suggestion verbatim.
  4. Classify each: fix (reviewer is right, or the change is cheaper than the debate) / discuss (real tradeoff - answer with the reasoning, no code yet) / decline with reason (conflicts with a project rule or an accepted ADR - cite it).
  5. When fixing a real issue, grep for the same class of issue across the tree and fix the siblings in the same commit - a reviewer flags one instance, not the whole class. If the comment exposes an unclear or wrong documented rule, fix the rule in the same change (dev-context-engineering). Apply fixes grouped into logical commits via git-commit-push (gates run before push).
  6. Reply to every handled thread, then mark it resolved (resolveReviewThread mutation by thread id) - the resolved flag is the only state that survives a re-run; a reply without resolve re-appears next run. Reply content: the commit reference for fixes, the reasoning for discuss/decline. Match the reviewer's tone; keep replies short.
  7. Out-of-scope asks: agree in the reply, file a follow-up item, link it - do not grow the PR.
  8. Report counts per category plus anything needing an owner decision.

Verify

  • Zero unanswered threads; every handled thread replied AND resolved; every fix commit pushed; gates green.

Scope / hand-off

  • CI babysitting and the outcome label - git-finalize-pr; merging - git-merge-pr.

CRITICAL

  • Never resolve a thread without a reply; never reply without resolving (it re-appears next run).
  • Verify a reviewer's claim against the code before accepting it - a confident but wrong bot comment is still wrong.
  • Conflicting reviewer asks - surface to both, never silently pick one.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.