AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Interview

skill-akovalion-paranoid-qa-interview · by akovalion

Structured requirements gathering through a series of questions. Use when the task is described verbally/informally (not from an issue tracker ticket) and scope, AC, and edge cases need clarifying before work starts.

No reviews yet
0 installs
20 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-akovalion-paranoid-qa-interview

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-akovalion-paranoid-qa-interview)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
1mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Interview? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Interview: requirements gathering through questions

Help the user turn an informal task description into complete requirements ready to hand off to the test-cases or testing skills.

When to apply

  • The task is described verbally or in general terms, without a ticket
  • No AC, no mockups, no clear scope
  • The user is unsure what exactly to test/automate

If the task already comes from an issue tracker (Jira etc.) with a full description — this skill is not needed: gather context straight from the ticket (via the tracker's MCP: description, comments, attachments, linked issues) and hand off to test-cases.

Process

Round 1: scope and context. Ask 3-4 questions via AskUserQuestion:

  • What exactly is being checked (feature, page, element)
  • Where it lives (URL, screen, navigation path)
  • Task type (new functionality / regression / bug)
  • Platforms (desktop / mobile / both)

Round 2: behavior and AC. Based on the round 1 answers:

  • Happy path — what behavior counts as correct
  • Edge cases — which negative scenarios matter
  • UI states (loading, error, empty, disabled) — if applicable
  • Integrations — any APIs / external services

Round 3: clarifications on remaining gaps. Only if critical gaps remain after rounds 1-2. Group related questions.

Maximum 3 rounds. If the requirements are still incomplete — log the gaps as "Questions for the analyst/PM" and work with what you have.

Output format

Once the interview is done, assemble a structured summary:

# Requirements: 

## Context
- Type: 
- Platforms: 
- URL / location: 

## Scope

## Acceptance Criteria
- 
- 

## Scenarios
**Happy path:** 

**Edge cases:**
- 
- 

## Integrations

## Open questions for the analyst/PM
- 

Save the summary to an md file (e.g. requirements_.md in the current working directory) and offer to hand it off to test-cases or testing.

What to prefer

  • 4 precise questions beat 10 boilerplate ones
  • Tie questions to the previous round's answers instead of running down a checklist
  • If the user answers "don't know" — log it as a question for the analyst, do not push
  • Use concrete answer options in questions (AskUserQuestion options), not open-ended wording

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.