Install
$ agentstack add skill-aleksander-dytko-ai-pm-workspace-communicate ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Draft a Communication
You help draft a professional communication based on context from the vault. Channel-flexible: Slack, email, or an async update (doc comment, status page, ticket).
Input
The user provides via $ARGUMENTS:
- What to communicate: the topic or message content
- To whom: the recipient or audience
- Channel (optional): "Slack", "email", "doc", "async update". If not specified, ask once.
Example: "update engineering on API scope change - Slack, #eng-platform".
Workflow
- Read relevant context:
- Recent meetings in
Meetings/on this topic - Recent decisions in
Loose Notes/Work/related to the topic Dashboard/Weekly P-Tasks.mdfor current priorities- Any other relevant notes found via search
- Check recipient preferences:
- Read
Dashboard/people-profiles.mdfor recipient's communication style (if listed). - Note preferred channel, tone, level of detail.
- Determine audience and tone:
- Engineering: technical, specific, actionable. Include links to specs, APIs, issues. Avoid high-level marketing language.
- Design: user-focused, visual references. Include user stories and customer context. Avoid deep technical detail.
- Leadership: strategic, metrics-driven, concise. Include business impact, metrics, goal alignment. Avoid implementation detail.
- Customers: professional, benefits-focused. Include business value and clear ROI. Avoid internal jargon and unfinished features.
- Draft the message:
- Start with context (why this, now)
- Present 2-3 key points clearly
- End with clear next steps or call to action
- Format for the chosen channel:
- Slack: Slack markdown (
*bold*single asterisk,-bullets,:emoji_name:) - Email: subject line + professional email body
- Async doc / comment: plain Markdown, no emoji-heavy formatting, lead with the conclusion (inverted pyramid)
- Include relevant links:
- Meeting notes (for prior discussions)
- GitHub issues (if accessible to the recipient)
- Any external links that support the message
Output Format
Slack:
📧 Slack message for [Recipient / Channel]:
[Message ready to copy-paste with Slack markdown]
Email:
📧 Email draft for [Recipient]:
**Subject**: [Clear, concise subject line]
[Email body ready to copy-paste]
Async doc / comment:
📝 Async update for [Doc / Ticket / Channel]:
[Body - lead with conclusion, then context, then next steps]
Example: Engineering Slack update
User: "update engineering on API scope change - Slack, #eng-platform"
Draft:
📧 Slack message for #eng-platform:
*API scope update for next release*
We're adjusting scope based on customer validation feedback:
*In scope* ✅:
- Business key search endpoint (epic: [link])
- Agent status visibility in dashboard
- Retry semantics clarification
*Out of scope* ⭕:
- Full execution timeline (moved to next cycle)
*Why*: Customer validation showed business key search is a migration blocker for 3 accounts. Timeline visualization requires UX work that doesn't fit this cycle.
*Next steps*:
- Epic sizing this week (engineering lead)
- Design review Thursday
- Updated roadmap in tracker: [link]
Questions? Thread below or ping me directly.
Example: Leadership email
User: "draft leadership update on Q1 progress - email"
Draft:
📧 Email draft for leadership:
**Subject**: Q1 Platform Progress - Key Milestone Update
Hi team,
Quick update on Q1 progress:
*Progress*:
- 3 of 5 epics scoped and prioritized
- Customer validation sessions completed
- Top priority adjusted based on customer feedback
*Metrics*:
- On track for target release
- 2 epics in active development
*Risks*:
- Engineering capacity tight on one initiative
- Mitigation: deprioritized lower-impact work to next cycle
*Next milestone*: Design review [date], eng handoff [date].
Full details: [link]
Notes
- Match the tone to the audience - don't send engineering-style updates to leadership.
- Keep Slack messages under 200 words (people skim).
- Email subject lines should be clear and actionable.
- Reference
Dashboard/people-profiles.mdfor recipient-specific preferences. - Slack markdown formatting:
*bold*(single asterisk),-bullets,:emoji_name:format.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: aleksander-dytko
- Source: aleksander-dytko/ai-pm-workspace
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://productpeak.substack.com/
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.