AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Thesis Excellence

skill-alessandrocaforio-academic-writing-thesis-excellence · by AlessandroCaforio

Multi-agent thesis review — dispatches specialized agents based on scope, synthesizes combined report

No reviews yet
0 installs
44 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-alessandrocaforio-academic-writing-thesis-excellence

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-alessandrocaforio-academic-writing-thesis-excellence)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
5mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Thesis Excellence? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Thesis Excellence Review

Orchestrate a comprehensive multi-agent review of the thesis. The argument specifies the scope.

Scope Options

  • all — Review the entire thesis (all written chapters)
  • 04_methodology / 05_results / etc. — Review a specific chapter
  • code — Review all analysis notebooks
  • pre-submit — Full pre-submission check (everything)

Orchestration Procedure

Step 1: Compile

Run tectonic to verify compilation:

cd /Users/alessandro/Projects/Tesi/thesis && tectonic main.tex 2>&1

If compilation fails, report the error and stop.

Step 2: Determine Agents to Dispatch

Based on the scope, select which agents to run:

| Scope | Agents | |-------|--------| | Any .tex chapter | proofreader, latex-auditor, notation-checker | | Ch. 4 or Ch. 5 | + causal-inference | | Chapters with \citet/\citep | + literature-rag | | code scope | code-reviewer | | all or pre-submit | All agents |

Step 3: Run Agents

Use the Task tool to fork to each agent in parallel where possible. For each agent:

  • proofreader: Read the chapter(s) and produce a proofreading report
  • latex-auditor: Compile and check cross-references, citations, formatting
  • notation-checker: Check all math against the notation registry
  • causal-inference: (only for Ch. 4/5) Deep methodology review
  • literature-rag: (only for chapters with citations) Verify top claims via RAG
  • code-reviewer: (only for code scope) Review notebooks

Step 4: Synthesize Report

Combine all agent reports into a unified assessment:

THESIS EXCELLENCE REPORT
=========================
Scope: [what was reviewed]
Date:  [date]

COMPILATION: [PASS/FAIL]

AGENT REPORTS:
├── Proofreader:       [summary + issue count]
├── LaTeX Auditor:     [summary + issue count]
├── Notation Checker:  [summary + issue count]
├── Causal Inference:  [summary + top recommendation]
├── Literature RAG:    [summary + verification rate]
└── Code Reviewer:     [summary + issue count]

QUALITY ASSESSMENT:
├── Clarity:       X/10
├── Rigor:         X/10
├── Consistency:   X/10
├── Completeness:  X/10
└── Presentation:  X/10
Overall: X.X/10

TOP 5 PRIORITY ACTIONS:
1. [highest priority improvement]
2. [second priority]
3. [third priority]
4. [fourth priority]
5. [fifth priority]

DETAILED FINDINGS:
[Include full agent reports below, organized by agent]

Important

  • Quality scores are ADVISORY ONLY — they never block any action
  • Focus the "priority actions" on items that would most improve the thesis
  • If an agent fails or times out, note it and continue with others
  • For pre-submit scope, be especially thorough — this is the final check before submission

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.