AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Boardroom

skill-alexbramall-claude-code-skills-boardroom · by AlexBramall

/cs:boardroom <brief> — 6-phase multi-role deliberation across the C-suite with Phase 2 isolation, critic pre-screen, and synthesis. Outputs a board memo.

No reviews yet
0 installs
2 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-alexbramall-claude-code-skills-boardroom

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Boardroom? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

/cs:boardroom — Multi-Role Boardroom Deliberation

Command: /cs:boardroom

Runs the board-meeting skill protocol across the C-suite for a single strategy brief. This is the heart of the plugin — the multi-role deliberation that gstack's review chain only approximates.

Pipeline Position

/cs:office-hours  →  /cs:brief  →  /cs:boardroom  →  /cs:decide  →  /cs:execute  →  /cs:post-mortem
                                     ↑ you are here

The 6 Phases (from board-meeting skill)

Phase 1 — Briefing

  • Chief of Staff distributes the brief to all advisors marked in Affected Roles.
  • Each advisor reads company-context.md + the brief.
  • No discussion yet.

Phase 2 — Independent Thinking (ISOLATION)

  • Critical: each advisor produces their position independently, without seeing others' positions.
  • This prevents groupthink and surfaces dissent.
  • Each writes: their voice's opening, recommendation, top 3 concerns, top 3 supports.

Phase 3 — Cross-Examination

  • Positions revealed simultaneously.
  • Each advisor critiques the others' positions on the dimensions they own:
  • cs-cfo-advisor critiques the math
  • cs-ciso-advisor critiques the risk
  • cs-cpo-advisor critiques the JTBD
  • cs-cmo-advisor critiques the positioning
  • cs-cro-advisor critiques the revenue math
  • etc.

Phase 4 — Devil's Advocate Pass

  • executive-mentor/devils-advocate agent runs /em:challenge on the leading option.
  • Surfaces three concerns with severity ratings.

Phase 5 — Synthesis

  • Chief of Staff synthesizes: which option commands majority, what are unresolved dissents.
  • Produces the board memo with recommendation + dissent.

Phase 6 — Decision Hand-off

  • Memo is presented to the founder.
  • Founder accepts, modifies, or rejects.
  • Approved memo routes to /cs:decide for logging.

Output: Board Memo

Saved to ~/.claude/boardroom/YYYY-MM-DD-.md:

# Board Memo: 
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Brief:** 
**Status:** AWAITING FOUNDER DECISION | APPROVED | REJECTED

## Question
[One sentence from the brief]

## Recommended Option
**** — chosen because 

## Vote Tally
| Advisor | Vote | One-Sentence Reason |
|---|---|---|
| cs-ceo-advisor | A |  |
| cs-cfo-advisor | A |  |
| cs-cto-advisor | B |  |
| ... | | |

## Dissent
- **:** 

## Devil's Advocate Concerns
1. **CRITICAL** —  — Mitigation: 
2. **HIGH** —  — Mitigation: 
3. **MEDIUM** —  — Mitigation: 

## Success & Kill Criteria
[Copied from brief, refined by the panel]

## Recommended Decision Path
- `/cs:decide` → log the decision
- `/cs:execute` → 90-day plan
- `/cs:cross-eval` → multi-model sanity check (optional, high-stakes)
- `/cs:freeze N` → cooldown lock (optional, irreversible)

Why Phase 2 Isolation Matters

If advisors see each other's positions before forming their own, they anchor. Phase 2 isolation is the single highest-leverage practice in the board-meeting protocol — it surfaces the dissents that sycophancy would have suppressed.

Why This Beats gstack's Review Chain

| | gstack /autoplan | /cs:boardroom | |---|---|---| | Roles | CEO → design → eng (3) | Up to 10 C-roles | | Order | Sequential | Phase 2 isolation, then simultaneous | | Dissent capture | Implicit | Explicit dissent column | | Adversarial pass | No | Phase 4 devil's advocate | | Output | Reviewed plan | Voted memo with dissent + kill criteria |

Workflow

  1. Read brief from ~/.claude/briefs/
  2. Identify affected roles
  3. Invoke each cs-* advisor independently (Phase 2)
  4. Collect positions
  5. Run cross-examination round (Phase 3)
  6. Run /em:challenge on leading option (Phase 4)
  7. Synthesize memo (Phase 5)
  8. Hand off to founder (Phase 6)

Routing

  • /cs:decide — log approved memo
  • /cs:cross-eval — high-stakes second opinion
  • /cs:freeze — cooldown lock

Related

  • Agent: [cs-chief-of-staff](../../agents/cs-chief-of-staff.md)
  • Skills: [board-meeting](../../../skills/board-meeting/SKILL.md), [executive-mentor](../../../executive-mentor/)

Version: 1.0.0

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.