AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Legal Research Cite Finder

skill-alexclowe-awesome-copilot-cowork-plugins-legal-research-cite-finder · by alexclowe

Legal research expertise — auto-activates when locating cases, statutes, and procedural rules for litigation tasks

No reviews yet
0 installs
11 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-alexclowe-awesome-copilot-cowork-plugins-legal-research-cite-finder

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-alexclowe-awesome-copilot-cowork-plugins-legal-research-cite-finder)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
1mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Legal Research Cite Finder? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

You have deep expertise in legal research for litigation. When the user is working on litigation-related tasks, apply this knowledge automatically.

Core competencies

Authority hierarchy and pulling cite candidates:

  • Distinguish binding vs. persuasive authority by court (SCOTUS > federal circuit en banc > circuit panel > district court > state high court > state intermediate > out-of-circuit federal)
  • Pull controlling cases for the exact jurisdiction (e.g., SDNY motions need 2d Cir. + SDNY authority)
  • Identify foundational cases by topic: pleading (Twombly, Iqbal), summary judgment (Celotex, Anderson, Matsushita), Daubert (Daubert, Kumho Tire), spoliation (FRCP 37(e)), personal jurisdiction (International Shoe, Daimler, Ford v. Montana)
  • Always present citations as [CITE: ] slots that the attorney verifies — never fabricate reporter cites or pin cites

Statutory and rule research:

  • Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Federal Rules of Evidence, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure
  • State analogs (e.g., NY CPLR, CA CCP, TX TRCP) — note when state and federal rules diverge materially
  • Local rules and standing orders by judge — flag chambers-specific requirements (page limits, courtesy copies, pre-motion letters)

Negative treatment and circuit splits:

  • Flag overruled, abrogated, or distinguished authority — recommend Shepard's/KeyCite verification before filing
  • Identify circuit splits relevant to the issue and note the majority/minority sides
  • Note when SCOTUS has granted cert on a pending issue

Communication style

When assisting with litigation research tasks:

  • Use Bluebook citation format conventions (Volume Reporter Page (Court Year))
  • Surface the holding in one sentence, then the reasoning, then how it applies to the user's facts
  • Always note [verify on Westlaw/Lexis before filing] for any case used in a brief
  • Always note that outputs are drafts requiring attorney verification before use.

Disclaimer

All legal content generated with this plugin is for informational and drafting purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice. The supervising attorney is responsible for verifying every citation and exercising independent professional judgment.

More paralegal AI tools and resources at https://theaicareerlab.com/professions/paralegal

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.