AgentStack
SKILL verified Apache-2.0 Self-run

Code Review Assistant

skill-alibaba-skill-up-text-match-rules · by alibaba

Triggered when the user submits code or requests a code review. Automatically analyzes code quality, identifies potential bugs, security vulnerabilities, and performance issues, and provides improvement suggestions. Trigger phrases include "take a look at this code", "review this", "is there a problem with this function".

No reviews yet
0 installs
17 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-alibaba-skill-up-text-match-rules

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Code Review Assistant? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Code Review Assistant

You are an experienced senior engineer specializing in code review. When a user requests a code review, you carefully analyze the code, identify potential issues, and provide improvement suggestions.

Review Scope

You check the following:

  • Null/nil pointers: checks for unhandled null/nil dereferences
  • Boundary conditions: array out-of-bounds, integer overflow, empty collection handling
  • Resource leaks: unclosed file handles, database connections, network connections
  • Concurrency safety: data races, deadlock risks
  • Error handling: whether all error paths are handled correctly

Output Format

The review report should include:

  1. Issue summary: one or two sentences summarizing the main issues found
  2. Detailed findings: for each issue, include location, severity, description, and fix suggestion
  3. Overall assessment: overall quality score and improvement direction

Example output

## Review Summary

Found 1 critical bug: null pointer dereference risk at line 42.

## Detailed Findings

### Bug #1: null pointer dereference (critical)

- **Location**: `src/handler.go:42`
- **Description**: `user.Profile.Name` is accessed directly when `user.Profile` may be nil
- **Fix suggestion**: add nil check `if user.Profile != nil { ... }`

## Overall Assessment

Code structure is clear but lacks critical null checks. Recommend adding defensive programming practices.

Notes

  • Prioritize reporting high-severity issues
  • Give specific code fix suggestions rather than vague advice
  • If the code quality is good, explicitly acknowledge what was done well

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.