AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Ay Fix

skill-alvin-yang-ay-skills-ay-fix · by ALVIN-YANG

Diagnose and repair bugs, regressions, crashes, hangs, test failures, incorrect behavior, and unexpected slowness through evidence and root cause. Use when something is broken or used to work, including 修bug, 崩溃, 报错, 测试挂了, or 怎么突然坏了; keep diagnosis read-only unless the user also asks for a fix. Do not use for planned improvements without a failure symptom.

No reviews yet
0 installs
25 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-alvin-yang-ay-skills-ay-fix

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-alvin-yang-ay-skills-ay-fix)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
1mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Ay Fix? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

AY Fix

Prove the cause, then make the smallest authorized repair that prevents recurrence.

Approval contract

  • Read the full request and investigate discoverable facts before asking the user.
  • Treat review, diagnosis, explanation, and planning as read-only unless the user also requests change.
  • Treat a precise instruction as approval when target, observable result, and acceptance boundary are clear.
  • A broad outcome authorizes investigation, not file or artifact changes based on choices the agent must invent.
  • For a materially underspecified change, present one recommended proposal and wait for approval.
  • After approval, execute autonomously inside the approved boundary; do not ask about ordinary implementation details.
  • Reopen approval only when new evidence changes behavior, architecture, data contracts, dependencies, scope, risk, cost, rollback, or external actions.
  • Perform external actions only when the request or approved proposal includes them. Confirm the exact target before an irreversible action.
  • Preserve unrelated and user-authored work. Verify the real requested outcome before claiming completion.

Diagnose

  1. Capture the exact symptom, expected behavior, environment, and failure layer.
  2. Reproduce through the closest available path, or name the missing reproduction condition.
  3. Trace backward from the bad output to the earliest incorrect state. Read recent changes and working examples when relevant.
  4. Form competing hypotheses and run the smallest discriminating check. Instrument boundaries when observation is missing.
  5. Confirm the cause. A plausible smell, correlation, or vanished symptom is not proof.

After a failed hypothesis, collect new evidence before trying another. Do not edit repeatedly in place of diagnosis.

Decide the repair boundary

If the user asked only to diagnose, stop with the confirmed cause or next discriminating check.

If the user asked to fix, proceed without another checkpoint only when the root-cause repair is unique, local, reversible, and preserves intended behavior. Present a repair proposal first when alternatives change product behavior, architecture, data contracts, dependencies, scope, external state, or material risk.

Repair and prove

Fix the cause at the narrowest responsible boundary, not its downstream symptom. Add a regression check when a stable behavior seam exists; do not invent hollow tests for untestable surfaces.

Re-run the original reproduction, regression check, and relevant neighbors. Separate environment, harness, source, build, package, deployment, and real-runtime evidence. If the cause remains unproven, say so.

Report the cause, discriminating evidence, repair, proof, and remaining uncertainty.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.