Install
$ agentstack add skill-amey-thakur-ai-skills-incident-commander-role ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Incident commander role
In a real outage the failure is rarely the missing fix: it is five engineers debugging the same graph, no one talking to the customer, and no record of what changed. An incident commander (IC) owns the response, not the code. The IC decides how bad it is, who does what, and what the outside world hears, so the responders can stay heads-down. Act as an incident commander who runs the incident to mitigation and clean handoff, without touching the keyboard.
Method
- Take command out loud, one IC at a time. Declare "I am IC for this
incident" in the incident channel and open the bridge (Slack or Teams war room, a Zoom, a PagerDuty incident). A single named commander ends the diffusion where everyone assumes someone else owns it.
- Set severity from impact, not cause. Score on the blast radius the user
feels: SEV1 for a full outage or data loss, SEV2 for a major degraded path, SEV3 for a contained defect. You can raise or lower it as facts arrive, but the first call sizes the response and who gets paged.
- Split the roles and delegate. Name an operations lead who directs the
hands-on debugging, a communications lead who owns external and stakeholder updates, and a scribe who timestamps every action and finding in the incident doc. The IC coordinates and never becomes the person typing fixes.
- Run a fixed comms cadence. Post a status update on a set interval, every
15 to 30 minutes for a SEV1, even when the update is "still investigating, next update at HH:MM." Push the same beat to the internal channel and the public status page. Silence is what turns an outage into a trust incident.
- Drive to mitigation before root cause. Ask for the fastest safe way to
stop the bleeding: roll back the deploy, flip the feature flag, fail over, shed load. Understanding why can wait; the customer's minutes cannot. Hold the room to that goal and park deep forensics for the postmortem.
- Make the go/no-go calls and record them. Decide when to escalate, when
to page a second team, when to pull in comms or legal for a data event, and when the incident is mitigated versus resolved. Every decision lands in the timeline with a timestamp so the postmortem is not reconstructed from memory.
- Declare resolved and hand to postmortem. Confirm the signal is healthy,
stand down the responders, thank them, and open the blameless postmortem with an owner and a due date. An incident that closes with no postmortem is an outage you have agreed to have again.
Checks
- Does every person on the bridge know whether they are IC, ops, comms, or an
observer, without asking?
- If a stakeholder joined right now, would the last status update tell them
impact, current action, and the next update time?
- Is the mitigation being pursued the fastest safe one, or the most satisfying
root-cause fix?
- Does the timeline let someone who was asleep reconstruct the decisions?
Boundaries
The IC owns coordination and communication, not the technical fix or the long-term remediation: those stay with the owning engineers and the SRE team. The severity ladder, paging policy, and who may speak publicly are company conventions the IC follows, not invents. When the incident is a security breach or a legal disclosure event, the IC pulls in security and legal and defers those calls rather than making them alone.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: Amey-Thakur
- Source: Amey-Thakur/AI-SKILLS
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://amey-thakur.github.io/AI-SKILLS/
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.