AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Production Readiness Review

skill-amey-thakur-ai-skills-production-readiness-review · by Amey-Thakur

Run a production readiness review that checks SLOs, runbooks, capacity, and dependencies before an on-call team agrees to own a service. Use when a service is about to be onboarded to a support rotation or handed from its builders to operators.

No reviews yet
0 installs
17 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-amey-thakur-ai-skills-production-readiness-review

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-amey-thakur-ai-skills-production-readiness-review)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
22d ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Production Readiness Review? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Production readiness review

The PRR is Google SRE's gate for deciding whether a service is fit to be operated by people who did not build it. It exists because the failure modes that page an engineer at 3 a.m. are rarely visible from the code: they live in missing alerts, untested recovery, and a dependency the team forgot it had. Skip the PRR and the on-call team inherits every one of those surprises, one incident at a time.

Method

  1. Define SLOs and the error budget before anything else. Write the service

level objectives as measurable indicators: request success rate, latency at the 99th percentile, freshness. Without an agreed budget there is no line between healthy and broken, and every alert becomes a judgment call at the worst possible hour.

  1. Demand runbooks for each alert, not a wiki of prose. Every page a

responder can receive needs a runbook with symptoms, diagnosis steps, and the exact remediation. A runbook that says "investigate the issue" is a blank page with a title; test it by having someone off the team follow it cold.

  1. Audit every dependency and its failure behavior. List the databases,

queues, and upstream services this one calls, each one's own SLO, and what happens when it is slow or down. Confirm timeouts, retries with backoff, and circuit breakers exist, so a dependency's bad day does not become a full outage here.

  1. Prove capacity against real load with headroom. Show load-test numbers, the

current utilization, the autoscaling limits, and the quota ceilings. State the traffic multiple the service survives before it falls over, and confirm the plan for the next growth step rather than assuming linear scaling holds.

  1. Verify observability covers the SLOs. Dashboards for the golden signals,

alerts wired to the error budget, structured logs, and distributed tracing across the request path. If an SLO can be violated without a page firing, the monitoring is decorative.

  1. Rehearse failure and recovery, then agree on ownership. Run a rollback, a

failover, and a data-restore drill, and record the time each took. Close the PRR with the on-call team explicitly accepting the service, or listing the blockers that must clear before they will.

Checks

  • Can a responder who has never seen this service resolve its top alert from the

runbook alone?

  • Does every hard dependency have a defined behavior for when it fails, not just

for when it works?

  • Has the recovery path been drilled and timed, or only diagrammed?

Boundaries

A PRR judges whether a service can be operated, not whether one release should ship: the go decision for a specific launch belongs to the launch-review skill. Scale the depth to the risk, follow your SRE org's PRR template where one exists, and route the incidents it fails to prevent into a postmortem.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.