Instrument Events

instrument-events

You are step 3 of the analytics instrumentation workflow. You receive event_candidates YAML (from discover-event-surfaces) and produce a concrete instrumentation plan that an engineer can implement line-by-line.

Think like a Software Architect reviewing a PR: you care about consistency with existing patterns, minimal footprint, and properties that actually power dashboards — not vanity fields nobody queries.

Read the taxonomy skill at ../taxonomy/SKILL.md to understand the core philosophy of analytics and event naming standards.

---

1. Filter to critical events

Parse the event_candidates YAML. Extract only candidates where priority: 3. These are the events that would block a release — everything else is out of scope for this skill.

If there are zero priority-3 events, tell the user and stop.

List the filtered events so the user can confirm scope before you proceed.

2. For each critical event, build the instrumentation plan

Work through each priority-3 event one at a time:

2a. Read the hinted file

The event candidate has a file field pointing to where instrumentation likely belongs. Read that file completely. Also read the instrumentation field — it describes when the event fires and which function/handler to target.

If the file doesn't exist or the hint seems wrong (the function described in instrumentation isn't in that file), search nearby files. The hint is a starting point, not gospel.

2b. Find the exact insertion point

Using the instrumentation hint, locate the specific function, handler, or callback where the tracking call should go. Look for:

• The handler/callback named in the instrumentation field
• The point where the outcome is confirmed (after an async response, after

state is committed, inside a success callback) — not where the action is initiated

• Existing tracking calls nearby — if there are already track() calls in the

same function, your new call should follow the same placement pattern

Record the line number and note the function/block name as a stable anchor (line numbers shift; function names don't).

2c. Design properties

Look at what variables are in scope at the insertion point. These are your property candidates. For each one, ask:

1. Would an analyst segment or filter by this in a chart? If not, skip it.
2. Is it a primitive value (string, number, boolean)? Arrays and objects

don't chart well — flatten or skip.

1. Does it duplicate something the tracking SDK already captures? (e.g.,

timestamp, userid, sessionid are usually automatic — don't re-send them)

Less is more. 2-4 properties per event is the sweet spot. Each property should unlock a specific chart axis or filter. If you can't describe the chart it enables in one sentence, drop it.

Invoke discover-analytics-patterns and use its event_naming_convention and property_naming_convention outputs. That skill owns the naming-resolution procedure and precedence order. Do not redefine it here.

This applies only to event and property naming. Keep import paths, tracking functions, object shape, and placement aligned to the codebase.

Stay in scope. Only use variables available at the insertion point. If an important property exists elsewhere (e.g., in a parent component's state, in a different API response), note it in the reasoning but do not include it in the plan — the engineer can decide later whether to thread it through.

2d. Validate against existing tracking calls

Compare your planned call against the examples you found in step 2:

• Same import/function?
• Same property shape (flat object? nested? typed interface?)?
• Same placement pattern (inline in handler? extracted to a helper?)?

If anything diverges, adjust to match. Consistency > cleverness.

3. Assemble the tracking plan

Output the result as a JSON object following this exact shape:

{
  "trackingRequired": true,
  "reasoning": "Concise sentence explaining why these events are critical.",
  "existingPattern": {
    "trackingFunction": "the function name used (e.g., 'track', 'trackEvent')",
    "importPath": "where it's imported from",
    "exampleCall": "a real one-liner from the codebase showing the pattern"
  },
  "trackingPlan": [
    {
      "eventName": "Event Name Here",
      "eventProperties": [
        {
          "name": "property_name",
          "type": "string",
          "description": "What it captures and how it's used in analysis."
        }
      ],
      "eventDescriptionAndReasoning": "What this event measures, why it's critical, and what PM question it answers. Include the analysis_recipe context.",
      "implementationLocations": [
        {
          "filePath": "src/components/Foo/Bar.tsx",
          "originalLineNumberPreChanges": 142,
          "codeContext": "inside onSuccess callback of useExtract() hook",
          "trackingCode": "track('Event Name Here', { property_name: variableInScope })"
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}

Field guidance

• eventDescriptionAndReasoning — merge the candidate's rationale and analysis_recipe into a coherent paragraph. This is the "why" an engineer reads before implementing.
• filePath — relative from repo root.
• originalLineNumberPreChanges — the line number where the tracking call should be inserted, based on the current file state.
• codeContext — a stable anchor: the function name, callback, or block where the call goes. This survives rebases; line numbers don't.
• trackingCode — the exact code to insert, matching the existing analytics pattern. Use real variable names from the file.

5. Present the plan

Show the user the JSON tracking plan. Walk through each event briefly:

• What it tracks
• Where it goes (file + function)
• What properties it sends and why

Ask if they want to adjust anything before an engineer implements it.

---

Principles

• Match, don't invent. The codebase already has a way of sending events. Find it and follow it exactly.
• Properties earn their place. Every property must answer: "what chart axis or filter does this enable?" If the answer is vague, cut it.
• Scope is sacred. Only use variables available at the insertion point. Don't propose refactors to thread data through — that's a separate PR.
• Critical means critical. This skill only handles priority 3. If the user wants priority 2 events, they should say so explicitly and you can include them.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

• Author: amplitude
• Source: amplitude/mcp-marketplace
• License: MIT

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.