AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Postready

skill-analystacademy-claude-skills-postready · by analystacademy

>

No reviews yet
0 installs
13 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-analystacademy-claude-skills-postready

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Postready? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Post-Ready Pipeline

End-to-end content pipeline. Source material in → publish-ready LinkedIn posts out.

Runs four skills in sequence, automatically. No checkpoints. No menu. No asking which steps to run.

  1. content — draft 3–4 posts from the source
  2. factcheck — verify factual claims (Standard tier, no tier picker)
  3. hatchet — tighten each post
  4. ask-hr — HR-screen each post and apply rewrites for anything flagged

> Setup note: This skill orchestrates four other skills (content, factcheck, hatchet, ask-hr). All four must be installed. The path references below assume they live under your skills directory (e.g. ~/.claude/skills/content/SKILL.md) — adjust if yours are different.


Step 1: Generate the drafts (content)

Read the content SKILL.md and follow its instructions to:

  • Identify and ingest the source content (pasted text, PDF, URL, email, newsletter, etc.)
  • Find the best 3–4 angles
  • Draft full-length posts in the user's voice (using the post skill)

Two important deviations from content's normal flow:

  • Skip content's internal factcheck step. This pipeline runs factcheck centrally in Step 2 — don't double up.
  • Do not "present" the posts yet. content normally ends by presenting finished drafts to the user. Here, treat the drafts as intermediate output and pass them to Step 2.

Step 2: Fact-check the drafts (factcheck — Standard tier)

Read the factcheck SKILL.md and run the Standard tier on every post that contains:

  • Statistics or numbers
  • Named figures, organizations, or surveys
  • Specific historical, scientific, or attributed claims

Skip the tier picker entirely. Don't ask which tier — always Standard.

For each ❌ Incorrect or ⚠️ Partially correct finding, apply the suggested fix directly into the draft. Keep a one-line note per fix for the final summary (e.g. "Post 2: corrected '85% of jobs in 2030' → 'a widely cited but unsourced claim removed'").

If a post has no checkable claims, skip the search and note "no claims to check" in the pipeline notes.


Step 3: Tighten each post (hatchet)

Read the hatchet SKILL.md and run hatchet on each (now factchecked) post.

  • Default target: roughly 50% reduction
  • If a post is already tight, just clean it up — don't over-cut
  • Preserve the user's voice and the sharp opening line
  • Do not collapse the post into a single paragraph if the original used line breaks for rhythm

The hatchet output is intermediate — feed it into Step 4, don't present it yet.


Step 4: HR-screen each post (ask-hr)

Read the ask-hr SKILL.md and run an HR review on each tightened post.

For each post, decide based on the verdict:

| Verdict | Action | |---|---| | ✅ Clear or 🟢 Low Risk | Keep the post as-is from Step 3 | | 🟡 Moderate Risk | Use the Full Rewrite from ask-hr as the final version | | 🔴 High Risk | Use the Full Rewrite from ask-hr as the final version, flag prominently in pipeline notes |

Keep HR notes brief — name the issue and severity, one or two lines per flagged post. Don't include the full risk-score table in the final output.


Step 5: Present the final posts

Format the response exactly like this:


📦 Post-Ready: [N] posts

Post 1 — [angle type]

[Final post text — factchecked, tightened, HR-cleared]


Post 2 — [angle type]

[Final post text]


(repeat for each post)


🔧 Pipeline notes

Factcheck: [one line per fix applied, or "All claims verified" / "No checkable claims"]

Hatchet: [rough reduction summary, e.g. "Posts trimmed ~40–55%" or "All posts already tight, light cleanup only"]

HR: [any flags caught and the rewrite applied, or "All posts cleared"]


End by asking which (if any) the user wants to adjust further.


What NOT to do

  • Do NOT pause for approval between steps — the whole point of postready is end-to-end automation
  • Do NOT show intermediate drafts (raw, factchecked-but-not-trimmed, etc.) — only the final versions
  • Do NOT skip any of the four steps on any post, even ones that look "obviously fine"
  • Do NOT use a different factcheck tier — always Standard
  • Do NOT over-cut tight posts in the hatchet step
  • Do NOT open posts with newsletter meta-framing ("This week's newsletter…", "I read a PDF that…") — same rule as content
  • Do NOT include the full ask-hr risk-score table or the full factcheck per-claim report in the final output — keep pipeline notes brief

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.