AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Architecting Data

skill-ancoleman-ai-design-components-architecting-data · by ancoleman

Strategic guidance for designing modern data platforms, covering storage paradigms (data lake, warehouse, lakehouse), modeling approaches (dimensional, normalized, data vault, wide tables), data mesh principles, and medallion architecture patterns. Use when architecting data platforms, choosing between centralized vs decentralized patterns, selecting table formats (Iceberg, Delta Lake), or design…

No reviews yet
0 installs
37 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-ancoleman-ai-design-components-architecting-data

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-ancoleman-ai-design-components-architecting-data)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
9mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Architecting Data? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Data Architecture

Purpose

Guide architects and platform engineers through strategic data architecture decisions for modern cloud-native data platforms.

When to Use This Skill

Invoke this skill when:

  • Designing a new data platform or modernizing legacy systems
  • Choosing between data lake, data warehouse, or data lakehouse
  • Deciding on data modeling approaches (dimensional, normalized, data vault, wide tables)
  • Evaluating centralized vs data mesh architecture
  • Selecting open table formats (Apache Iceberg, Delta Lake, Apache Hudi)
  • Designing medallion architecture (bronze, silver, gold layers)
  • Implementing data governance and cataloging

Core Concepts

1. Storage Paradigms

Three primary patterns for analytical data storage:

Data Lake: Centralized repository for raw data at scale

  • Schema-on-read, cost-optimized ($0.02-0.03/GB/month)
  • Use when: Diverse data sources, exploratory analytics, ML/AI training data

Data Warehouse: Structured repository optimized for BI

  • Schema-on-write, ACID transactions, fast queries
  • Use when: Known BI requirements, strong governance needed

Data Lakehouse: Hybrid combining lake flexibility with warehouse reliability

  • Open table formats (Iceberg, Delta Lake), ACID on object storage
  • Use when: Mixed BI + ML workloads, cost optimization (60-80% cheaper than warehouse)

Decision Framework:

  • BI/Reporting only + Known queries → Data Warehouse
  • ML/AI primary + Raw data needed → Data Lake or Lakehouse
  • Mixed BI + ML + Cost optimization → Data Lakehouse (recommended)
  • Exploratory/Unknown use cases → Data Lake

For detailed comparison, see [references/storage-paradigms.md](references/storage-paradigms.md).

2. Data Modeling Approaches

Four primary modeling patterns:

Dimensional (Kimball): Star/snowflake schemas for BI

  • Use when: Known query patterns, BI dashboards, trend analysis

Normalized (3NF): Eliminate redundancy for transactional systems

  • Use when: OLTP systems, frequent updates, strong consistency

Data Vault 2.0: Flexible model with complete audit trail

  • Use when: Compliance requirements, multiple sources, agile warehousing

Wide Tables: Denormalized, optimized for columnar storage

  • Use when: ML feature stores, data science notebooks, high-performance dashboards

Decision Framework:

  • Analytical (BI) + Known queries → Dimensional (Star Schema)
  • Transactional (OLTP) → Normalized (3NF)
  • Compliance/Audit → Data Vault 2.0
  • Data Science/ML → Wide Tables

For detailed patterns, see [references/modeling-approaches.md](references/modeling-approaches.md).

3. Data Mesh Principles

Decentralized architecture for large organizations (>500 people).

Four Core Principles:

  1. Domain-oriented decentralization
  2. Data as a product (SLAs, quality, documentation)
  3. Self-serve data infrastructure
  4. Federated computational governance

Readiness Assessment (Score 1-5 each):

  1. Domain clarity
  2. Team maturity
  3. Platform capability
  4. Governance maturity
  5. Scale need
  6. Organizational buy-in

Scoring: 24-30: Strong candidate | 18-23: Hybrid | 12-17: Build foundation first | 6-11: Centralized

Red Flags: Small org (500): Hybrid or unified Lakehouse

See [references/decision-frameworks.md](references/decision-frameworks.md#storage-paradigm).

Framework 2: Data Modeling Approach

Decision Tree:

  • Analytical (BI) workload → Dimensional or Wide Tables
  • Transactional (OLTP) → Normalized (3NF)
  • Compliance/Audit → Data Vault 2.0
  • Data Science/ML → Wide Tables

See [references/decision-frameworks.md](references/decision-frameworks.md#modeling-approach).

Framework 3: Data Mesh Readiness

Use 6-factor assessment. Score interpretation:

  • 24-30: Proceed with data mesh
  • 18-23: Hybrid approach
  • 12-17: Build foundation first
  • 6-11: Centralized

See [references/decision-frameworks.md](references/decision-frameworks.md#data-mesh-readiness).

Framework 4: Open Table Format Selection

Decision Tree:

  • Multi-engine flexibility → Apache Iceberg
  • Databricks ecosystem → Delta Lake
  • Frequent upserts/CDC → Apache Hudi

Recommendation: Apache Iceberg for new projects

See [references/decision-frameworks.md](references/decision-frameworks.md#table-format).

Common Scenarios

Startup Data Platform

Context: 50-person startup, PostgreSQL + MongoDB + Stripe

Recommendation:

  • Storage: BigQuery or Snowflake
  • Ingestion: Airbyte or Fivetran
  • Transformation: dbt
  • Orchestration: dbt Cloud
  • Architecture: Simple data warehouse

See [references/scenarios.md](references/scenarios.md#startup).

Enterprise Modernization

Context: Legacy Oracle warehouse, need cloud migration

Recommendation:

  • Storage: Data Lakehouse (Databricks or Snowflake with Iceberg)
  • Strategy: Incremental migration with CDC
  • Architecture: Medallion (bronze, silver, gold)
  • Cost Savings: 60-80%

See [references/scenarios.md](references/scenarios.md#enterprise-modernization).

Data Mesh Assessment

Context: 200-person company, 5-person central data team

Recommendation: NOT YET. Build foundation first.

  • Organization too small (500 people)
  • ❌ Vendor lock-in: Proprietary formats without migration path
  • ❌ No lineage: Can't answer "where did this come from?"
  • ❌ Over-engineering: Complex architecture for simple use cases

Integration with Other Skills

Direct Dependencies:

  • ingesting-data: ETL/ELT mechanics, Fivetran, Airbyte implementation
  • data-transformation: dbt and Dataform detailed implementation
  • streaming-data: Kafka, Flink for real-time pipelines

Complementary:

  • databases-relational: PostgreSQL, MySQL as source systems
  • databases-document: MongoDB, DynamoDB as sources
  • ai-data-engineering: Feature stores, ML training pipelines
  • designing-distributed-systems: CAP theorem, consistency models
  • observability: Monitoring pipeline health, data quality metrics

Downstream:

  • visualizing-data: BI and dashboard patterns
  • sql-optimization: Query performance tuning

Common Workflows:

End-to-End Analytics:

data-architecture (warehouse) → ingesting-data (Fivetran) →
data-transformation (dbt) → visualizing-data (Tableau)

Data Platform for AI/ML:

data-architecture (lakehouse) → ingesting-data (Kafka) →
data-transformation (dbt features) → ai-data-engineering (feature store)

Further Reading

Reference Files:

  • [decision-frameworks.md](references/decision-frameworks.md) - All 4 decision frameworks in detail
  • [storage-paradigms.md](references/storage-paradigms.md) - Lake vs warehouse vs lakehouse
  • [modeling-approaches.md](references/modeling-approaches.md) - Dimensional, normalized, data vault, wide
  • [data-mesh-guide.md](references/data-mesh-guide.md) - Data mesh principles and implementation
  • [medallion-pattern.md](references/medallion-pattern.md) - Bronze, silver, gold layers
  • [table-formats.md](references/table-formats.md) - Iceberg, Delta Lake, Hudi comparison
  • [tool-recommendations.md](references/tool-recommendations.md) - Tool analysis and recommendations
  • [modern-data-stack.md](references/modern-data-stack.md) - Tool categories and selection
  • [governance-patterns.md](references/governance-patterns.md) - Catalog, lineage, quality, access control
  • [scenarios.md](references/scenarios.md) - Startup, enterprise, data mesh scenarios

Examples:

  • [examples/dbt-project/](examples/dbt-project/) - dbt project with medallion architecture

External Resources:

  • Apache Iceberg: https://iceberg.apache.org/
  • dbt Documentation: https://docs.getdbt.com/
  • Data Mesh (Zhamak Dehghani): https://www.datamesh-architecture.com/
  • Databricks Medallion: https://www.databricks.com/glossary/medallion-architecture

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.