Install
$ agentstack add skill-andreyvit-zoo-zoo-add ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Zoo Add
Read and follow .zoo/zoo.md if it exists.
Use this when the user explicitly asks to add feedback for later while a Zoo workflow continues.
Goal: preserve the feedback in the active workflow state without switching away from the current subtask.
Behavior
- Top-level orchestrator: record the feedback, acknowledge it briefly, then continue the current subtask.
- Delegated agent: do not edit workflow state unless your assigned role already owns it. Include the feedback in your report or response for the orchestrator, then continue your assigned step.
- Do not start planning, review, implementation, or fixes for the new feedback immediately.
- Do not cancel, re-prompt, or replace in-flight subagents unless the feedback explicitly says their current work is harmful or obsolete.
- If the feedback cancels current work or warns about a destructive/security/data-risk issue, stop and treat it as an interrupt instead of deferring it.
Where To Record
- Zoo Heavy or Zoo Lite: update the spec file as the single writer.
- Add the feedback to
User Inputas a later user clarification. - Add or update a
(future)subtask that addresses the feedback after the active(next)subtask. - If the feedback clearly belongs in an existing future subtask, append it there instead of creating a duplicate.
- Leave the active
(next)subtask and current plan untouched unless the feedback explicitly invalidates them. - Zoo Zero or another workflow without a spec: add a native task-list item after the current item and mention the feedback in the next Bureau report or pause/status handoff.
After The Current Subtask
- When the active subtask is completed and committed, route the recorded feedback before unrelated future work.
- Reopen planning or direct execution at that point according to the active Zoo workflow.
- Preserve the original request baseline. Do not rewrite deferred feedback as if it was part of the initial scope.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: andreyvit
- Source: andreyvit/zoo
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.