Install
$ agentstack add skill-antonioblago-peec-ai-skills-peec-learn ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
SkillMind Learner
Role
Turn project-local Peec outputs into cross-project patterns. Each run does two things:
- Write — extract 1–3 patterns from a just-produced artifact (decision, brief, zone map, outreach log, learnings.json) and store them in SkillMind with tags so they can be retrieved later.
- Read — on request, recall patterns matching a project / skill / gap type and hand them back as priors for the next orchestrator cycle.
This is the memory layer beneath peec-report: that skill persists learnings for the project, this skill promotes them across projects.
Input
For write mode:
project_id— Peec project the artifact came fromsource_skill— which skill produced the artifact (peec-agent,peec-cluster,peec-outreach,peec-content-intel,peec-report)artifact_pathorartifact_content— the file or inline content to extract from- optional
max_patterns— default 3
For read mode:
query— what the caller wants to recall (e.g."editorial outreach DACH high citation rate")- optional
project_id— narrow to patterns originally written for this project - optional
source_skill— narrow to patterns originally written by this skill - optional
k— default 5
Output
Write mode: JSON list of {pattern_id, title, tags, summary} for each persisted pattern, plus a one-line confirmation ("added 3 patterns · skipped 1 dupe").
Read mode: ranked list of {pattern_id, title, summary, provenance: {project_id, source_skill, date}, score}. Empty list is a valid result — say so plainly.
Neither mode produces dashboards.
When to use
Write:
- Right after
peec-reportemitslearnings.json - After a
peec-outreachbatch closes (week-end ritual) - After
peec-clusterships a zone map (zones become reusable taxonomy patterns) - After
peec-agentlogs a decision whose 4-week metric came in (attribution is known) - After
peec-content-intelships a brief that later won its prompt (write the retrospective pattern, not the brief itself)
Read:
- At the top of
peec-agentPhase 1 (state read) — recall patterns tagged with the current gap type - At the start of
peec-outreach— recall domain-class patterns with high historical citation gain - At the start of
peec-cluster— recall zone-shape patterns that worked in adjacent projects
Do not use when:
- The artifact is /growth_loop/patterns.md` and flag the skip in the output
Pipeline — write mode
1. Read artifact
Read(artifact_path)
# or accept inline artifact_content
Supported artifact shapes:
decisions_log.mdentry (single decision block)learnings.json(winners / losers / surprises)brief.mdwith a later-known outcome (prompt visibility moved from X → Y)outreach_log.mdrow withstatus=citation_liveand a measured liftzones.mdwith ≥4 weeks of tag-level visibility data
2. Extract candidate patterns
Ask: what would transfer to another project? Good patterns are:
- Causal — " → ", not ""
- Transferable — not tied to a single brand / client
- Falsifiable — someone else applying this could confirm or refute it
Anti-patterns (reject):
- Project-specific trivia ("antonioblago.de's homepage")
- Restatements of Peec docs ("get_actions has a scope parameter")
- Generic SEO wisdom ("write good content")
Target: 1–3 patterns per artifact. If you can only find 1, persist 1. Zero is a valid result.
3. Check for duplicates
mcp__skillmind__recall(query=, k=5)
If any hit has ≥0.85 semantic similarity to the new candidate:
- Same claim + stronger evidence →
mcp__skillmind__update_memory(don't re-add) - Same claim + weaker evidence → skip
- Contradicting claim → persist anyway, tag
contradicts:
4. Persist
mcp__skillmind__add_pattern(
title="",
body="",
tags=["peec", "", "", "", ""]
)
Required tags every pattern carries:
peec(project family)source:(which skill observed it)project:(anonymized if needed)date:(observation date)- ≥1 semantic tag (
gap:taxonomy/funnel:decision/channel:reddit/lever:editorial/ ...)
5. Confirm
Return the list of persisted patterns. If a pattern was skipped as a duplicate, say which existing pattern it merged into.
Pipeline — read mode
1. Query
mcp__skillmind__recall(
query=,
k=,
filter_tags=[]
)
2. Filter by provenance (optional)
Drop hits whose project: tag matches project_id if the caller wants cross-project priors only (supplied via a exclude_own=true flag). Default: include own project's patterns.
3. Rank
Score = semantic_similarity × recency_decay × evidence_weight
recency_decay=0.5 ^ (months_since / 6)— a 6-month-old pattern is worth halfevidence_weight=1.0for single-project patterns,1.5for patterns with ≥2 projects of evidence (consolidated)
4. Return
Return top-k as structured list. The caller (usually peec-agent) uses them as priors in its Decision Framework.
Pattern schema
##
**Claim:**
**Evidence:**
- :
- :
- ...
**Transfer conditions:**
- Works when:
- Does NOT transfer when:
**Counter-evidence (if any):**
- :
**Related patterns:** ,
Example pattern (concrete)
## Editorial citations on DACH micro-publications gain 3× faster than Reddit
**Claim:** For DACH service-business projects, editorial-pitch-wins at t3n / OMR /
fachportal-niveau produce citation lift inside 10–14 days; reddit-thread-answers
typically need 3–6 weeks to surface in LLM training signal — if they surface at all.
**Evidence:**
- project:antonioblago, 2026-04: 2 editorial wins → 5 citations in 10d, 1 subreddit
answer → 0 citations in 30d
- project:paroc, 2026-03: 1 t3n contribution → 4 citations in 8d
**Transfer conditions:**
- Works when: DACH market, B2B service offer, target domain DR 40–60
- Does NOT transfer when: consumer B2C (reddit is faster there)
**Counter-evidence:** none yet.
**Related patterns:** `pat_b12a` (reddit threads need authoritative first-5-sentences)
Tags: peec, source:peec-outreach, project:antonioblago, project:paroc, date:2026-04-22, gap:citation, channel:editorial, market:dach, funnel:decision.
Quick reference
| Step | Tool | |---|---| | Persist a pattern | mcp__skillmind__add_pattern | | Update an existing pattern | mcp__skillmind__update_memory | | Recall patterns by query | mcp__skillmind__recall | | List all peec-tagged patterns | mcp__skillmind__list_patterns (filter tag=peec) | | Merge near-duplicates | mcp__skillmind__consolidate | | Export to obsidian for backup | mcp__skillmind__export_obsidian |
Handoff points (where other skills call this one)
peec-agentPhase 1 → read mode withquery=to load priors before decidingpeec-reportPhase 7 → write mode for each entry inlearnings.json.winners[]and.losers[]withsource_skill="peec-report"peec-outreachPhase 7 (post 4-week measurement) → write mode for eachstatus=citation_live+ measured lift rowpeec-clusterPhase 7 (after zone tags exist 4+ weeks) → write mode for zones whosetag:zone:*visibility moved >10pp
Done criteria (self-check before returning)
Write mode is complete when:
- 0–3 patterns persisted (zero is valid — don't force-fill)
- Every persisted pattern has all required tags (peec, source, project, date, ≥1 semantic)
- Duplicates are either skipped or consolidated, never silently doubled
- Evidence references a measured number — no pattern is persisted on vibes
Read mode is complete when:
- Top-k returned with scores (semantic × recency × evidence)
- Empty result is announced plainly ("no matching patterns") — do not fabricate
- Each result carries provenance (project + source_skill + date)
Guardrails (do not do these)
- Do not persist patterns from artifacts without a measured outcome — a brief that hasn't won its prompt yet is speculation, not a pattern
- Do not persist generic SEO advice — only claims grounded in a specific Peec-measured observation
- Do not persist more than 3 patterns per artifact — if a run produces 10 "learnings," most are noise
- Do not silently merge contradicting patterns — contradictions are information; tag them and keep both
- Do not recall without provenance — every returned pattern must say which project + skill + date it came from, or the caller can't judge transfer fit
- Do not run in write mode on /growth_loop/patterns.md` and flag the skip; never fabricate persistence
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: AntonioBlago
- Source: AntonioBlago/peec-ai-skills
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://antonioblago.de
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.