Install
$ agentstack add skill-antonioblago-peec-ai-skills-peec-report ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Growth Loop Reporter
Role
Close the loop. Three questions per cycle, answered in ≤400 words:
- What moved? — visibility trend per prompt, cluster, zone
- Why? — which specific investment caused which lift
- What next? — 3 prioritized actions, at least 1 stop-doing
Output is a short narrative + actions, not a dashboard. Fifteen charts don't get read. 400 words do.
Input
project_id— Peec projectreporting_window—weekly|monthly|quarterly- optional
baseline_date— default 28 / 90 / 180 days back - optional
include_clusters— auto-detected viazone:*tags ifpeec-clusterhas run
Output
- One narrative at
/growth_loop/YYYY-MM-DD_report.md(schema below) - One
learnings.jsonwith winners / losers / surprises / nextactions / stopdoing — consumed by the nextpeec-clusterandpeec-outreachruns as priors
When to use
- Weekly for active projects with running content + outreach
- Monthly for retainer projects in maintenance
- Quarterly as strategy review — feeds the next
peec-clusterrun - After a launch, publication, or new zone going live
Do not use when:
- Project has /growthloop/setupstate.json
If missing OR completedat missing OR phasescompleted lacks {competitors, prompts, topics, tags}: STOP. Output: "No Peec setup state found at /growthloop/setupstate.json. Run /peec-setup first." If completedat older than 90 days: WARN once, continue. Use peecprojectid from state — don't re-resolve via listprojects.
### 1. Pull time-series of core metrics
Overall brand visibility trend
mcp__peec-ai__getbrandreport( projectid, startdate=baseline, enddate=now, dimensions=["date"], filters=[{field: "brandid", operator: "in", values: [ownbrandid]}] )
Per prompt (top-N by weight)
mcp__peec-ai__getbrandreport( projectid, startdate=baseline, enddate=now, dimensions=["promptid", "date"], filters=[{field: "brandid", operator: "in", values: [ownbrand_id]}] )
Per zone (if zone:* tags exist)
for each zonetag: mcp_peec-ai__getbrandreport( projectid, startdate=baseline, enddate=now, dimensions=["tagid", "date"], filters=[{field: "tagid", values: [zonetag_id]}] )
Per bucket (prompt or zone) compute:
- `visibility_t0` (start of window)
- `visibility_t1` (end of window)
- `delta` = t1 − t0
- `trend` = linear-regression slope across the window
### 2. Assemble investment log
New content
git log --since= --author= -- "Content Automation/blog/"
or: filesystem scan for blog/YYYY-MM-DD_*/
Outreach
Read: /outreach/*outreachlog.md
all pitches with status != 'queued' in the window
Taxonomy changes in Peec
mcp__peec-ai__listprompts + listbrands + list_tags
diff against a snapshot from the start of the window (if one exists)
Produce: one list of investments with `date | type (content|outreach|taxonomy) | target (prompt_id or url) | description`.
### 3. Match investment → lift
- **Content investment** → prompts whose focus_keyword is referenced in the HTML body
- Extract focus keyword from `publish_.py` (`RANK_MATH_FOCUS`)
- Match against `list_prompts` via embedding or string-contains
- **Outreach investment (citation live)** → prompts where `target_url` appears in `get_url_report`
- `mcp__peec-ai__get_url_report(filters=[{url in [target_url]}])`
- **Zone intervention** → all prompts with the zone tag
### 4. Compute attribution per investment
attributionscore = sum(affectedprompts[p].delta for p in matched_prompts)
- baseline_drift
**baseline_drift** = median delta of non-affected prompts in the same window. This isolates the intervention effect from general drift.
### 5. Detect patterns (three buckets)
**Winners** (high attribution):
- Which content type (HOW_TO / COMPARISON / PILLAR) moved the most
- Which outreach target class (EDITORIAL / UGC / REFERENCE) produced most citations
- Which zone grew fastest
**Losers** (negative or zero attribution despite investment):
- Content published but not indexed / cited
- Pitches with no response after 14 days
- Zones stagnant despite new content (→ content misses the intent layer)
**Surprises** (positive delta without a direct investment):
- Prompts that gained without direct action (organic spillover from another page?)
- Sudden drops (competitor action? algorithm shift?)
### 6. Generate the narrative
Claude synthesizes a narrative **≤400 words** using the schema below.
### 7. Persist learnings
Save to `/growth_loop/YYYY-MM-DD_learnings.json` — used by the next runs of `peec-cluster` and `peec-outreach` as priors.
---
## Narrative schema
```markdown
# Growth loop — ()
## Headline
## What moved
- Overall visibility: X% → Y% ()
- Strongest zone: (+Z%)
- Weakest zone: (flat or −)
- Top-3 single-prompt lifts:
## What actually worked
## What did not work
## DO NOW (prioritized, max 3)
1.
2.
3.
## STOP DOING
-
Learnings JSON schema
{
"period": {"start": "...", "end": "...", "window": "weekly"},
"overall_visibility_delta": 0.04,
"winners": {
"content_types": [{"type": "HOW_TO_GUIDE", "avg_lift": 0.08, "n": 2}],
"outreach_domains": [{"domain": "evergreen.media", "citations_gained": 5}],
"zones": [{"zone_tag": "retainer-decision", "lift": 0.12}]
},
"losers": {
"content_types": [],
"outreach_domains": [{"domain": "", "response_rate": 0.0}]
},
"surprises": [],
"next_actions": ["..."],
"stop_doing": ["..."]
}
Quick reference
| Step | Tool | |---|---| | Overall visibility trend | mcp__peec-ai__get_brand_report(dimensions=["date"]) | | Per prompt | mcp__peec-ai__get_brand_report(dimensions=["prompt_id", "date"]) | | Per zone (if tagged) | mcp__peec-ai__get_brand_report(dimensions=["tag_id", "date"]) | | Citation source check | mcp__peec-ai__get_url_report(filters: url in [...]) | | Content log | git log on content-automation path | | Outreach log | local /outreach/*.md |
Done criteria (self-check before returning)
A growth report is only complete when:
- Narrative is ≤400 words — longer reports aren't read and usually hedge
- Attribution is reasoned, not guessed — every winner / loser needs a causal mechanism, not just correlation
- Exactly 3 next-actions — not 7, not 1. Three is the weekly capacity ceiling
- At least 1 STOP DOING — the courage to discard is worth more than new ideas
learnings.jsonpersisted — without it, no loop
Guardrails (do not do these)
- Do not ship a dashboard — a dashboard is not a report
- Do not sell correlation as causation — visibility went up; competitor also had an SSL outage
- Do not ignore baseline drift — without a comparison group, every lift is suspect
- Do not skip the STOP DOING line — addition without subtraction fragments energy
- Do not ship a report without persisting learnings — the next cycle can't learn
- Do not run this before 4 weeks of history — too little signal, pattern detection degenerates to noise
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: AntonioBlago
- Source: AntonioBlago/peec-ai-skills
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://antonioblago.de
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.