AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Qa

skill-anylegal-ai-anylegal-oss-qa · by anylegal-ai

Quality assurance review — 6-dimension checklist covering template compliance, factual accuracy, completeness, track changes, research audit, and instruction cross-reference.

No reviews yet
0 installs
10 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-anylegal-ai-anylegal-oss-qa

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Qa? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Quality Assurance Review

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • The user says /qa
  • A matter is transitioning from WORKING to REVIEW
  • Counsel requests a fresh QA pass after a return
  • The agent has finished editing a document and needs verification

Process

1. Inventory the Workspace

Call list_documents to see all files. Identify:

  • The primary deliverable (the main contract/document being worked on)
  • The intake summary (intake_*.md) for client instructions
  • Any playbook files (Playbook/*.md, anylegal.md)
  • Any research notes or memos created during the work
  • The original uploaded document (if different from the deliverable)

2. Template Compliance Check

Read the deliverable with read_document. Check:

  • [ ] Document structure matches the expected template format
  • [ ] Clause numbering is sequential and correct
  • [ ] Cross-references (to other clauses, schedules, annexes) are accurate
  • [ ] Defined terms are used consistently (capitalization, spelling)
  • [ ] No placeholder text remains (e.g., "[INSERT]", "TBD", "XXX")
  • [ ] Standard boilerplate clauses are present (severability, governing law, etc.)

3. Factual Accuracy Check

Verify legal facts in the document:

  • [ ] Jurisdiction references are correct for the matter type
  • [ ] Legal citations (statutes, regulations, case law) are valid — use web_search to spot-check
  • [ ] Dates, deadlines, and time periods are internally consistent
  • [ ] Party names and entity types are correct throughout
  • [ ] Currency and monetary amounts are consistent

4. Completeness Check

Read the intake summary and compare against the deliverable:

  • [ ] All client instructions from intake have been addressed
  • [ ] All documents mentioned in intake have been reviewed/incorporated
  • [ ] No sections are left unfinished or contain TODO markers
  • [ ] If multi-jurisdictional, all specified jurisdictions are covered

5. Track Changes Review

Use run_code (default Python) with lxml to count tracked changes (w:ins, w:del), extract authors, and assess edit scope. Then:

  • [ ] Every insertion has a clear purpose (improves protection, fixes error, adds required clause)
  • [ ] Every deletion is justified (removes risk, corrects error, simplifies)
  • [ ] No unintended formatting-only changes
  • [ ] Tracked changes are clean (no stacked/overlapping revisions)
  • [ ] Total edit count is proportionate to the matter scope

6. Research Audit

If research notes or memos exist:

  • [ ] Web sources cited are accessible and authoritative
  • [ ] Citations use [[N]](URL) format with working URLs
  • [ ] Legal positions are supported by the cited sources
  • [ ] No hallucinated or outdated legal references

Use web_search and web_fetch to spot-check 2-3 key citations.

7. Generate QA Report

Create a qa_.md document with:

# QA Report — [Matter Title]

**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Reviewer:** Agent QA
**Document:** [deliverable filename]

## Summary
[1-2 sentence overall assessment]

## Checklist

### Template Compliance
- [x] Structure matches template
- [x] Numbering correct
...

### Factual Accuracy
- [x] Jurisdictions correct
...

### Completeness
- [x] All client instructions addressed
...

### Track Changes
- [x] All edits justified
...

### Research Audit
- [x] Citations verified
...

## Issues Found
[List any issues, with severity: CRITICAL / WARNING / INFO]

## Verdict
[PASS / PASS WITH WARNINGS / FAIL]

Guidelines

  • Be thorough but proportionate — a simple NDA review needs less scrutiny than a cross-border compliance matter
  • If you find CRITICAL issues, clearly flag them — these block approval
  • WARNING issues should be noted but don't necessarily block approval
  • Always generate the QA report even if everything passes — the report is the audit trail
  • If the original document is available, use compare to verify the edit scope makes sense
  • Do not modify the deliverable during QA — only read and report

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.