AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified Apache-2.0 Self-run

Control Flow Abstraction Generator

skill-arabelatso-skills-4-se-control-flow-abstraction-generator · by ArabelaTso

Generate abstract Control Flow Graph (CFG) representations of programs showing loops, branches, and function calls for static analysis or verification. Use when users need to: (1) Visualize program control flow structure, (2) Generate CFGs for static analysis tools, (3) Create control flow abstractions for formal verification, (4) Analyze program paths and reachability, (5) Document program struc…

No reviews yet
0 installs
25 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-arabelatso-skills-4-se-control-flow-abstraction-generator

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-arabelatso-skills-4-se-control-flow-abstraction-generator)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
5mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Control Flow Abstraction Generator? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Control Flow Abstraction Generator

Generate abstract Control Flow Graph representations of programs.

Overview

This skill analyzes program code and generates Control Flow Graphs (CFGs) that abstract the program's control flow structure. CFGs show how execution flows through the program via nodes (statements, conditions) and edges (control transfers), making them suitable for static analysis, formal verification, and program understanding.

How to Use

Provide:

  1. Program code: Function or program to analyze
  2. Analysis scope: Function-level or program-level
  3. Output format (optional): Textual, DOT, JSON, or multiple

The skill will generate:

  • CFG with nodes and edges
  • Node types (entry, exit, statement, condition, merge)
  • Edge types (sequential, true/false branches, back edges, calls)
  • Optional: DOT format for visualization, JSON for tool integration

CFG Generation Workflow

Step 1: Parse Program Structure

Identify program constructs:

  • Sequential statements: Assignments, expressions, declarations
  • Conditional statements: if-then-else, switch-case
  • Loop statements: while, for, do-while
  • Function calls: Direct calls, recursive calls
  • Control transfers: break, continue, return, goto
  • Exception handling: try-catch-finally

Step 2: Create CFG Nodes

Generate nodes for each construct:

Entry Node: Function/program start

  • Label: ENTRY or function name
  • Type: entry
  • Successors: First statement

Exit Node: Function/program end

  • Label: EXIT or return
  • Type: exit
  • Predecessors: All return points

Statement Node: Regular statement

  • Label: Statement text or line number
  • Type: statement
  • Represents: Assignment, call, expression

Condition Node: Branch decision

  • Label: Boolean expression
  • Type: condition
  • Successors: True branch, false branch

Merge Node: Branch join point

  • Label: MERGE or empty
  • Type: merge
  • Predecessors: Multiple branches

Step 3: Create CFG Edges

Connect nodes with appropriate edges:

Sequential Edge: Normal flow

  • From: Statement/node
  • To: Next statement/node
  • Label: None or

True Edge: Condition true branch

  • From: Condition node
  • To: True branch first statement
  • Label: T or true

False Edge: Condition false branch

  • From: Condition node
  • To: False branch first statement
  • Label: F or false

Back Edge: Loop iteration

  • From: Loop body end
  • To: Loop header
  • Label: or back

Call Edge: Function invocation (interprocedural)

  • From: Call site
  • To: Called function entry
  • Label: or call

Return Edge: Function return (interprocedural)

  • From: Called function exit
  • To: Call site return point
  • Label: or return

Step 4: Handle Special Constructs

Loops: Create back edges from body to header

Break: Create edge from break statement to loop exit

Continue: Create back edge from continue to loop header

Return: Create edge from return to EXIT node

Exceptions: Create exception edges from try block to catch handlers

Step 5: Generate Output

Produce CFG in requested format(s):

  • Textual representation
  • DOT format for Graphviz
  • JSON for tool integration

Example: Simple Conditional

Code:

def max_value(x, y):
    if x > y:
        result = x
    else:
        result = y
    return result

CFG (Textual):

Node 1 (ENTRY):
  Label: max_value
  Successors: [2]

Node 2 (x > y):
  Type: condition
  Predecessors: [1]
  Successors: [3 (true), 4 (false)]

Node 3 (result = x):
  Type: statement
  Predecessors: [2]
  Successors: [5]

Node 4 (result = y):
  Type: statement
  Predecessors: [2]
  Successors: [5]

Node 5 (MERGE):
  Type: merge
  Predecessors: [3, 4]
  Successors: [6]

Node 6 (return result):
  Type: statement
  Predecessors: [5]
  Successors: [7]

Node 7 (EXIT):
  Predecessors: [6]

CFG (Visual):

    ENTRY
      ↓
   [x > y]
    ↓   ↓
   T↓   ↓F
    ↓   ↓
[result=x] [result=y]
    ↓       ↓
    └→MERGE←┘
        ↓
  [return result]
        ↓
      EXIT

CFG (DOT):

digraph CFG {
  node [shape=box];

  n1 [label="ENTRY", shape=ellipse];
  n2 [label="x > y", shape=diamond];
  n3 [label="result = x"];
  n4 [label="result = y"];
  n5 [label="MERGE", shape=circle];
  n6 [label="return result"];
  n7 [label="EXIT", shape=ellipse];

  n1 -> n2;
  n2 -> n3 [label="T", color=green];
  n2 -> n4 [label="F", color=red];
  n3 -> n5;
  n4 -> n5;
  n5 -> n6;
  n6 -> n7;
}

Example: While Loop

Code:

def sum_to_n(n):
    sum = 0
    i = 0
    while i  threshold:
            result.append(item * 2)
        else:
            if item  threshold]       ↑
  ↓T            ↓F       ↑
[result.append  [item ():
  Type: 
  Predecessors: []
  Successors: []

DOT Format (Graphviz)

Graph visualization format:

digraph CFG {
  node [shape=box];
  n1 [label="...", shape=...];
  n1 -> n2 [label="...", color=...];
}

Generate PNG/SVG with: dot -Tpng cfg.dot -o cfg.png

JSON Format

Machine-readable for tool integration:

{
  "nodes": [
    {"id": 1, "label": "...", "type": "..."}
  ],
  "edges": [
    {"from": 1, "to": 2, "type": "..."}
  ]
}

Analysis Levels

Function-Level (Intraprocedural)

Scope: Single function Nodes: Statements within function Edges: Control flow within function Calls: Treated as single statement nodes

Use cases:

  • Function-level analysis
  • Loop detection
  • Path analysis within function

Program-Level (Interprocedural)

Scope: Multiple functions Nodes: Statements across all functions Edges: Control flow + call/return edges Calls: Explicit call and return edges

Use cases:

  • Whole-program analysis
  • Call graph construction
  • Interprocedural dataflow

CFG Properties

Dominance

Node A dominates node B if every path from ENTRY to B passes through A.

Uses: Loop header identification, optimization

Post-Dominance

Node A post-dominates node B if every path from B to EXIT passes through A.

Uses: Control dependence, merge point identification

Reachability

Node B is reachable from node A if there exists a path from A to B.

Uses: Dead code detection, path analysis

Strongly Connected Components

Maximal set of nodes where every node is reachable from every other.

Uses: Loop detection, cycle analysis

Common Patterns

Sequential Statements

Pattern: Linear flow See: [cfgpatterns.md](references/cfgpatterns.md#sequential-statements)

If-Then-Else

Pattern: Diamond shape with merge See: [cfgpatterns.md](references/cfgpatterns.md#conditional-statements)

While Loop

Pattern: Back edge from body to header See: [cfgpatterns.md](references/cfgpatterns.md#loop-statements)

Break/Continue

Pattern: Direct edges to exit/header See: [cfgpatterns.md](references/cfgpatterns.md#loop-statements)

Try-Catch

Pattern: Exception edges to handlers See: [cfgpatterns.md](references/cfgpatterns.md#exception-handling)

References

Detailed CFG construction patterns:

  • [cfgpatterns.md](references/cfgpatterns.md): Comprehensive patterns for all control flow constructs with examples

Load this reference when:

  • Need detailed patterns for specific constructs
  • Working with complex nested structures
  • Want to see all output format examples
  • Need CFG property definitions

Tips

  1. Start with entry/exit: Always create ENTRY and EXIT nodes first
  2. Handle loops carefully: Identify loop headers and create back edges
  3. Merge branches: Create explicit merge nodes after conditionals
  4. Label edges clearly: Use T/F for branches, mark back edges
  5. Consider scope: Choose function-level or program-level based on use case
  6. Visualize complex CFGs: Use DOT format for large graphs
  7. Validate structure: Check that all nodes are reachable from ENTRY
  8. Document assumptions: Note how you handle language-specific constructs

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.