AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Debug Issue

skill-arasz-ai-badger-debug-issue · by Arasz

>-

No reviews yet
0 installs
16 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-arasz-ai-badger-debug-issue

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-arasz-ai-badger-debug-issue)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
17d ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Debug Issue? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Debug issue

Trace the call chain before hypothesizing. The failure this skill exists to prevent: proposing a fix before the call chain from symptom to entry point has actually been traced.

The workflow derives from the skill templates the code-review-graph project auto-installs (MIT, © 2026 Tirth Kanani), rewritten here to be tool-agnostic: every step carries a baseline that needs no graph server.

Steps

  1. Locate the code from the symptom.

Accelerated: a code-graph semantic-search call (e.g. semantic_search_nodes-shaped; discover the real tool name from the server's own listing) finds relevant code by meaning, not string match. Baseline: grep for the error message, log line, or another distinctive identifier (field name, status code, exception type) across the source tree.

  1. Trace callers and callees from that point — both directions, not just one.

Accelerated: a graph query for callers-of/callees-of the located symbol (e.g. query_graph- shaped with callers_of/callees_of patterns). Baseline: the IDE's find-references / go-to-definition, or grep -rn the symbol for callers and read the body for callees. Walk outward until reaching a test that exercises this path or a public entry point (HTTP handler, CLI command, message consumer, orchestration trigger).

  1. Follow the full execution path through the suspected area — the entry point that triggers

the bug is often several hops from where the symptom surfaces. Accelerated: a flow query (e.g. get_flow-shaped) returns the whole path in one call. Baseline: read each hop in sequence, noting where state changes or a branch could diverge.

  1. Check whether a recent change introduced it.

Accelerated: a change-detection call (e.g. detect_changes-shaped) flags recent risk-scored changes near the traced path. Baseline: git log -S'' --oneline -- or git blame the suspected lines — recent changes are the most common source of new issues, check this before assuming the bug is old.

  1. Only now form a hypothesis, stated as "execution reaches line X via path Y, and the bug is

Z because of change W" — or "the bug predates commit V because no recent change touched this path". A hypothesis with no traced path behind it is a guess, not a diagnosis.

Gotchas

No environment-specific gotchas known.

Red flags — STOP

  • Proposing a fix before step 2 has produced an actual caller/callee list
  • Tracing only one direction — callers alone miss what the function itself calls into
  • Treating "similar code exists elsewhere" as tracing this call chain
  • Skipping step 4 — a large share of new bugs are yesterday's diff; the history check is cheap

relative to guessing

A diagnosis is not finished until it names the specific call path (caller → … → entry point) showing the bug is reachable, and states whether a specific recent change is implicated. "I think it's this function" with no traced path is not a diagnosis.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.