AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Relationship Design

skill-ariadoss-superskills-relationship-design · by ariadoss

Design AI-first interfaces that build ongoing relationships through memory, trust evolution, and collaborative planning. Use when designing agentic UX, memory-aware interfaces, or relationship-centric product experiences. NOT for general UI/UX tasks.

No reviews yet
0 installs
0 views
view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-ariadoss-superskills-relationship-design

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README — it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-ariadoss-superskills-relationship-design)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
today

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming — see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps — measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Relationship Design? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Agentic UX Design — Relationship-Centric Interfaces

Design framework for AI-first interfaces that build ongoing partnerships, not isolated session interactions.

Core Shift

Traditional UX optimizes for sessions. Relationship-centric UX optimizes for sustained partnerships.

"Every interaction builds on learned preferences and user history. Systems don't just respond — they develop understanding that compounds over time."


Five Pillars

1. Memory Revolution

Moving beyond static preferences to capture:

  • Behavioral patterns across sessions
  • Emotional context (frustration, delight, confusion patterns)
  • Temporal evolution (how needs change over time)
  • Implicit signals (what users skip, ignore, repeat)

Design for: "What would this system know about the user after 3 months?"

2. Trust as Design Material

Three-stage trust model:

  1. Transparency — system shows all reasoning, asks permission
  2. Selective Disclosure — system explains only when deviating from expectations
  3. Autonomous Action — system acts independently with clear recovery paths

Design for: trust that can be inspected, corrected, and rebuilt.

3. Relationship-Centric Architecture

Maintain continuous awareness of:

  • User goals (not just current task)
  • Communication patterns (terse vs. exploratory)
  • Historical preferences
  • Outstanding commitments

Design for: context that doesn't reset between sessions.

4. Dynamic Path Planning

Systems that construct workflows aligned with individual objectives:

  • "What is this user actually trying to accomplish?"
  • Adaptive suggestions based on observed patterns
  • Proactive surfacing of relevant information

5. New Success Metrics

Replace traditional metrics with:

  • Relationship quality: does the system understand the user better over time?
  • Compounding value: does each interaction make future interactions more valuable?
  • Context accuracy: is stored understanding correct and current?
  • Democratic alignment: does the system serve the user's actual goals, not engagement goals?

Design Process

  1. Understand relationship context — what ongoing relationship is this product building?
  2. Map trust evolution — how does trust develop over days, weeks, months?
  3. Design memory architecture — what should be remembered, forgotten, surfaced?
  4. Build collaborative patterns — how does the system and user co-create over time?
  5. Define success across timeframes — week 1, month 1, month 6 metrics

Common Pitfalls

  • Treating memory as static settings rather than dynamic behavioral understanding
  • Using traditional engagement metrics (DAU, session length) for relationship-based systems
  • Designing trust as binary (trusted/not) rather than a spectrum
  • Building for the first interaction, not the 100th
  • Storing everything users say rather than what's actually useful to remember

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.