Install
$ agentstack add skill-ash1794-vibe-engineering-anti-rationalization-check ✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
About
vibe-anti-rationalization-check
LLMs systematically rationalize shortcuts. This skill catches it happening.
When to Use This Skill
- You catch yourself thinking "this is simple enough to skip testing"
- You're about to reduce scope without the user asking
- You notice you're explaining why something "doesn't really need" to be done
- A constraint feels "too strict" and you want to relax it
- You're about to say "in the interest of time..."
When NOT to Use This Skill
- The user explicitly asked to skip something
- You're genuinely unsure if something is needed (ask the user instead)
- The simplification is the user's explicit request
Known Rationalization Patterns
Watch for these thoughts — they're red flags:
| Rationalization | Reality | |----------------|---------| | "This is too simple to need tests" | Simple code in complex systems causes the hardest bugs | | "The user probably doesn't care about this edge case" | Production users will find every edge case | | "We don't need error handling here" | Internal code fails too, especially during refactors | | "I'll add that later" | "Later" never comes. Do it now or create a tracked task | | "This is just boilerplate" | Boilerplate often contains critical correctness constraints | | "The happy path is enough for now" | The sad path is where real users spend most of their time | | "It works, so it must be correct" | "Works" and "correct" are different things | | "This test is redundant" | Redundant tests catch redundant bugs | | "Let me simplify this requirement" | Simplifying without asking = silently dropping scope | | "This doesn't need documentation" | If you thought about it for >2 minutes, document why |
Steps
When you detect a rationalization:
- Name it — "I notice I'm rationalizing skipping [X]"
- State the constraint — "The requirement says [specific requirement]"
- Evaluate honestly — Is there a legitimate reason to skip this, or is it laziness?
- Choose:
- If legitimate: Ask the user "Should we skip X because Y?"
- If rationalization: Do the work. Don't mention the temptation.
- If you skipped something without asking: Go back and do it
Output
This skill doesn't produce output — it's a mental discipline check. When triggered, it modifies behavior, not output.
If invoked explicitly by the user, report:
- What rationalizations were detected in recent work
- What was skipped and why
- What should be revisited
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: ash1794
- Source: ash1794/vibe-engineering
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.