AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Vibe Anti Rationalization Check

skill-ash1794-vibe-engineering-anti-rationalization-check · by ash1794

Detects and prevents shortcut rationalization — when the agent is about to skip a step, simplify a requirement, or optimize away a constraint. Triggers proactively when rationalization patterns are noticed.

No reviews yet
0 installs
32 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-ash1794-vibe-engineering-anti-rationalization-check

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-ash1794-vibe-engineering-anti-rationalization-check)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
3mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Vibe Anti Rationalization Check? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

vibe-anti-rationalization-check

LLMs systematically rationalize shortcuts. This skill catches it happening.

When to Use This Skill

  • You catch yourself thinking "this is simple enough to skip testing"
  • You're about to reduce scope without the user asking
  • You notice you're explaining why something "doesn't really need" to be done
  • A constraint feels "too strict" and you want to relax it
  • You're about to say "in the interest of time..."

When NOT to Use This Skill

  • The user explicitly asked to skip something
  • You're genuinely unsure if something is needed (ask the user instead)
  • The simplification is the user's explicit request

Known Rationalization Patterns

Watch for these thoughts — they're red flags:

| Rationalization | Reality | |----------------|---------| | "This is too simple to need tests" | Simple code in complex systems causes the hardest bugs | | "The user probably doesn't care about this edge case" | Production users will find every edge case | | "We don't need error handling here" | Internal code fails too, especially during refactors | | "I'll add that later" | "Later" never comes. Do it now or create a tracked task | | "This is just boilerplate" | Boilerplate often contains critical correctness constraints | | "The happy path is enough for now" | The sad path is where real users spend most of their time | | "It works, so it must be correct" | "Works" and "correct" are different things | | "This test is redundant" | Redundant tests catch redundant bugs | | "Let me simplify this requirement" | Simplifying without asking = silently dropping scope | | "This doesn't need documentation" | If you thought about it for >2 minutes, document why |

Steps

When you detect a rationalization:

  1. Name it — "I notice I'm rationalizing skipping [X]"
  2. State the constraint — "The requirement says [specific requirement]"
  3. Evaluate honestly — Is there a legitimate reason to skip this, or is it laziness?
  4. Choose:
  • If legitimate: Ask the user "Should we skip X because Y?"
  • If rationalization: Do the work. Don't mention the temptation.
  1. If you skipped something without asking: Go back and do it

Output

This skill doesn't produce output — it's a mental discipline check. When triggered, it modifies behavior, not output.

If invoked explicitly by the user, report:

  • What rationalizations were detected in recent work
  • What was skipped and why
  • What should be revisited

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.